WRT the release of documentation, I've never quite understood this, based on Doncaster's oft repeated assertion that the SPFL is a members' organisation.
" The league had argued against it, claiming the information was commercially sensitive and could damage the SPFL's business - particularly its broadcast agreements". ( I would suggest Doncaster's actions have already damaged the SPFL's business )
How is it the members of a members' organisation are not allowed to see commercially sensitive information which affects the members ?
This might be excused if the decision was made to release it in open court but Lord Clark stated that it could be released to the petitioners and went on to say "Any issues of confidentiality can be dealt with in accordance with the normal practice of the court."
Seems dodgy that the SPFL wouldn't permit a member club to see the documents even when the confidentiality was guaranteed by "the normal practice of the court".
Will it come to light that the great deal with broadcasters that Doncaster has trumpeted, echoed by Liewell, will cost the member clubs the loss of revenue from 13 extra matches to be given to Sky and the information on what deal was done with BT Sport to reduce their claim down to £1.5M over 5 years ?
Other confidential information may be the cost of the Deloitte forensic investigation and details of Doncaster's personal remuneration deal.