Route 55
Well-Known Member
Whit?The fck....
Whit?The fck....
Whit?
Well everybody else is getting it, why not Wright.Have we had a full 90 minutes from him? Seems to disappear in games. He's a talent but thought he would be offering more by now.
Guardiola has spoken.He is not good enough, it’s that simple.
He is neat and tidy, has a bit of pace but there aren’t enough numbers in his game.
I haven’t came across anybody who can’t be, probably hasn’t been, mentioned.He is a decent add to the team we have more to worry about in our back line some players there who can't be mentioned are contributing zero to the team but the manager seems to think highly of them.
I think the issue on Sunday was that you could’ve replaced any and all of the front six.He had a very quiet second half but I think taking him off was a mistake
I think we need to ask all our front players to improve their end product? Our top scorer in europe certainly needs to improve his his ratio..I think asking Wright to improve his end product is pretty reasonable. Got to become more consistent. Doesn’t mean you don’t rate him. I’d also like him to get on the ball more and just go at the opposition. He can be too tentative at times.
I think we need to ask all our front players to improve their end product? Our top scorer in europe certainly needs to improve his his ratio..
I will rephrase that for you, bud, 2 assists. What don't the stats show? Ah the intricacies of Kent's failed passes, shite dribbling, ease of being dispossessed, garbage shooting.The "evidence" you have produced is garbage, it is redundant numbers, Wright scored against Dunfermline in the Cup and Livvy bud.
The work of Kent is hard yards, belter of a cross to assist and get us back in a European tie, winning a penalty to get us back in a game away to a shit of a ground, that is the difference, that is what stats don't actually show.
You can't seriously think Wright is producing more than Kent even this season, this is a wee joke here right.
He is not good enough, it’s that simple.
He is neat and tidy, has a bit of pace but there aren’t enough numbers in his game.
Only Wright can do something about that; if he's written off by me or anyone else on the Forum, why should that concern anyone here? If Wright is as good as many say he is what will opinions on here, for or against, do to affect him as a player?Far too early to be writing Scott Wright off. He is still young, still plenty of development possible. Personally I think he will have a good Rangers Career.
Kent has more than 2 assists this season though remember….so you need to rephrase it again.I will rephrase that for you, bud, 2 assists. What don't the stats show? Ah the intricacies of Kent's failed passes, shite dribbling, ease of being dispossessed, garbage shooting.
At no point have I said Wright has been better than Kent, but I am pointing out that Kent has performed slightly better, albeit with more opportunities than Wright. Who knows what Wright's numbers would have been given the same opportunities.
You are full of shite pal.
Not much of a surprise really, Lundstram is supposedly one of the highest earners at the club and came from the Premier League.Like Lundstrum will wait and see but atm am more confident that Lundstrum will prove the better signing.
Who in our team does post numbers at present?That turn he does, and the speed is effective, but he chooses the wrong option too often and doesn't post numbers as has been said. Could improve, was a low risk signing.
I understand the concept of 'low risk signing in one sense, but on the other hand I don't think it makes sense if a player gets so much time in the side. This year we have signed Wright, Simpson, and Sakala, and in my opinion they haven't added to the quality of the squad. I like Lundstram, and think he will come good, but those other three players are not what this side has needed; they don't replace Defoe, Itten, Katic or Arfield, in terms of quality.That turn he does, and the speed is effective, but he chooses the wrong option too often and doesn't post numbers as has been said. Could improve, was a low risk signing.
Wright an impact sub for me at the moment and a good one at that there's plenty coaching and improving in him yetHooked at half time. But aye, he’s a better option than Ryan Kent.
A half fit Kent is streets ahead.
When Kent hits form he offers a heck of a lot more then Wright.Wright an impact sub for me at the moment and a good one at that there's plenty coaching and improving in him yet
But your right Kent is miles ahead of him but Kent still has to contribute and hit form something he's failed to do this season
Give wright a bit of time overall he has been a good player for us, bassey struggled last season and has been better this season, hagi has just recently started to be consistently good, last season was subbed a lot,, Ryan Kent has never hit the heights this season nit even close, but he's a huge fav of Gerrard.When Kent hits form he offers a heck of a lot more then Wright.