Senior exec at cinch used to work for MacLennan

The Goalie

Well-Known Member
Hmmmm......

Robert Bridge, now a senior exec at cinch, was hired by telegraph media group in 2016 and reported directly to Murdoch MacLennan.

Story in the Times tomorrow.\



Robert Bridge, right, was pictured with Neil Doncaster, the SPFL chief executive, at the unveiling of the partnership


Robert Bridge, right, was pictured with Neil Doncaster, the SPFL chief executive, at the unveiling of the partnership
JOHN PHILLIPS/GETTY IMAGES

A senior executive at an online car dealership involved in a sponsorship row between Rangers and Scotland’s football chiefs used to work for the chairman of the Scottish league.

Robert Bridge was hired as the chief customer officer at Telegraph Media Group (TMG) in 2016 and reported directly to Murdoch MacLennan while he was running the business.

MacLennan now chairs the Scottish Professional Football League (SPFL). A five-year, £8 million package with Cinch, a car sales business, was announced by the SPFL in June.

Bridge was pictured with Neil Doncaster, the SPFL chief executive, at the unveiling of the partnership. There was embarrassment the following month as Rangers, the Premiership champions, said they could not comply with the arrangements as the club felt it broke the SPFL’s rules. Those state the rules do not need to be followed “if to do so would result in that club being in breach of a contractual obligation entered into prior to the commercial contract concerned”.

Rangers also said they had pointed this out before the SPFL signed the sponsorship contact. Rangers are refusing to allow Cinch branding on team shirts or on advertising boards.

Douglas Park, chairman of Rangers, owns Park’s of Hamilton, one of the largest privately owned motor dealership groups in Scotland. He believes that the deal struck by the SPFL breaches a commercial agreement which has been made between his company and Rangers.

Concerns have also been raised an external agency would receive a fee of £500,000 for brokering the Cinch deal.

MacLennan, who it is understood played no part in the commercial negotiations with Cinch, wrote to the other 41 SPFL clubs expressing his annoyance with the situation.

Park won a legal ruling stopping arbitration proceedings to resolve the situation and which instead sees the dispute being heard in the courts.
Earlier this week it was suggested by Lord Keen of Elie QC that Cinch approached Rangers to discuss potential commercial opportunities prior to announcing the SPFL deal.

Rangers denied negotiations had taken place which could have led to Ibrox being renamed but acknowledged there had been contact.

Rangers previously raised concerns about MacLennan having a conflict of interest in his SPFL position as he was the chairman of Independent News and Media. At the time that company included Dermot Desmond, Celtic’s largest shareholder, and Denis O’Brien, another Celtic shareholder, among its investors.

MacLennan, 72, stepped down as the TMG chief executive in June 2017 but remained deputy chairman. He became chairman of the SPFL in July 2017.

Bridge had worked at Yahoo before he joined TMG in the spring of 2016. At the time of the appointment it was announced he would be reporting directly to MacLennan who said: “Robert Bridge will have a crucial role in developing and offering new products to the customers who lie at the heart of our business.

“I am delighted he will be joining our senior team.”

After a brief spell with a maker of children’s cosmetics Bridge joined Cinch in January this year as its chief customer officer.

The SPFL, Cinch and Rangers all declined to comment. It is understood the Rangers hierarchy still have doubts over the governance arrangements at the SPFL.
Earlier this week it was suggested by Lord Keen of Elie QC that Cinch approached Rangers to discuss potential commercial opportunities prior to announcing the SPFL deal.

Rangers denied negotiations had taken place which could have led to Ibrox being renamed but acknowledged there had been contact.

Rangers previously raised concerns about MacLennan having a conflict of interest in his SPFL position as he was the chairman of Independent News and Media. At the time that company included Dermot Desmond, Celtic’s largest shareholder, and Denis O’Brien, another Celtic shareholder, among its investors.

MacLennan, 72, stepped down as the TMG chief executive in June 2017 but remained deputy chairman. He became chairman of the SPFL in July 2017.

Bridge had worked at Yahoo before he joined TMG in the spring of 2016. At the time of the appointment it was announced he would be reporting directly to MacLennan who said: “Robert Bridge will have a crucial role in developing and offering new products to the customers who lie at the heart of our business.
“I am delighted he will be joining our senior team.”

After a brief spell with a maker of children’s cosmetics Bridge joined Cinch in January this year as its chief customer officer.

The SPFL, Cinch and Rangers all declined to comment. It is understood the Rangers hierarchy still have doubts over the governance arrangements at the SPFL.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There’s a shock. A couple of people said there would be links between them in there somewhere. So the head of the SFA, the organisation we’re supposed to trust to arbitrate. More blatant corruption that’ll be allowed to pass.

EDIT: He’s chairman of SPFL. Hard to keep up with the spivs.
 
Last edited:
Maybe being a bit paranoid, or giving the cabal too much credit for foresight, but is it possible that we had made the SPFL aware of a possible conflict, and cinch then instigated ‘negotiations’ with us under the pretence of potential sponsorship, thus knowing it would make us look bad should the fallout occur?

Why would cinch have something lined up with the SPFL but also be trying to get involved with us separately? It does not make sense. Unless their offer of sponsorship was just a ruse to try and make us look duplicitous?

Also, if MacLennan already had contacts with someone at cinch, which is what you would expect him to bring to the table given his involvement with the SPFL in the first place, why was there a need to pay a 3rd party £500K to find a sponsor? MacLennan could have saved the Scottish game £500K by having a rummage through his Filofax and making a few calls.

Something does not add up in this respect.
 
Last edited:
Maybe being a bit paranoid, or giving the cabal too much credit for foresight, but is it possible that we had made the SPFL aware of a possible conflict, and cinch then instigated ‘negotiations’ with us under the pretence of potential sponsorship, thus knowing it would make us look bad should the fallout occur?

Why would cinch have something lined up with the SPFL but also be trying to get involved with us separately? It does not make sense. Unless their offer of sponsorship was just a ruse to try and make us look duplicitous?

Also, if MacLennan already had contacts with someone at cinch, which is what you would expect him to bring to the table given his involvement with the SPFL in the first place, why was there a need to pay a 3rd party £500K to find a sponsor? Something does not add up in this respect.
There’s a reason they put a newspaper guy at the top. A lot comes down to how things look. It’s very difficult to fight against something, even when you’re in the right, if most people think you’re in the wrong. It’s very difficult to force change via a vote when you look like the bad guy.
 
Maybe being a bit paranoid, or giving the cabal too much credit for foresight, but is it possible that we had made the SPFL aware of a possible conflict, and cinch then instigated ‘negotiations’ with us under the pretence of potential sponsorship, thus knowing it would make us look bad should the fallout occur?

Why would cinch have something lined up with the SPFL but also be trying to get involved with us separately? It does not make sense. Unless their offer of sponsorship was just a ruse to try and make us look duplicitous?

Also, if MacLennan already had contacts with someone at cinch, which is what you would expect him to bring to the table given his involvement with the SPFL in the first place, why was there a need to pay a 3rd party £500K to find a sponsor?

Something does not add up in this respect.
Re thru agents it could well be a preferred mechanism for such business .

re the unethical part that’s always possible with these
 
These crooked corrupt rats who run the game in this country don't give a shit if they are caught in any illegal or unethical business. They will carry on as normal. I believe they have the control of nearly every chairman through having some things they don't want to be out in the open. Corrupt the lot of them
 
Interesting

SPFL looking for a sponsor any sponsor for their shit product

lo and behold cinch step in with a shite offer which Square Heid bites their hand off to take

it’s then revealed a 3rd party did the negotiations

now it’s revealed the top man at cinch was once employed by and reported to Rangers hating cünt face Murdoch McLennan when at The Telegraph

I’d be interested to know who this 3rd party are and how they negotiated £500k off the top of the total deal
 
There’s a shock. A couple of people said there would be links between them in there somewhere. So the head of the SFA, the organisation we’re supposed to trust to arbitrate. More blatant corruption that’ll be allowed to pass.

EDIT: He’s chairman of SPFL. Hard to keep up with the spivs.
And to think there were posters on here falling over themselves to lay the blame with our board, Bisgrove or our lawyers.

Wonder how many will appear on this thread?
 
Bet they weren’t expecting this to be disclosed.

Presumably the exec disclosed this conflict of interest and removed himself from the negotiating table ?
Do we know if this particular exec was definitely involved in the agreements and what role he had , does seem like a CoI should have been under consideration mate

oh btw has anyone checked his Twitter / FB / Instagram yet
 
Last edited:
Totally over the moon.

They kicked thereself square in the balls when they signed the Cinch deal. It finally gave us something to take them to the cleaners. They must surely win this case against us or be booted out.

Theres only 2 clubs that any investment gives a shit about in Scotland and for them to balls it up so bad can only leave them hanging by a thread.

But then again this is Scotland isnt it.
 
Which raises the question, why did we need to pay a middle-man to secure this deal, if there were executives with a history of working together? Surely the two parties could’ve secured this deal themselves?
A rhetorical question if ever I seen one.
The fuhrer sitting rubbing his hawns.
 
Do we know if this particular exec was definitely involved in the agreements and what role he had , does seem like a CoI should have been under consideration mate

oh btw has anyone checked his Twitter / FB / Instagram yet

Hes happy to have his photo taken as his crowning moment to be the face for this deal which would be a complete ‘no no’ in any company if he had disclosed a conflict of interest.

As for the SPFL having a 3rd party negotiate the deal, there is nothing specialist about a sponsorship agreement which would require that to be the case. The money laundering angle or back handers being paid out probably isn’t far off here.
 
Last edited:
Interesting

SPFL looking for a sponsor any sponsor for their shit product

lo and behold cinch step in with a shite offer which Square Heid bites their hand off to take

it’s then revealed a 3rd party did the negotiations

now it’s revealed the top man at cinch was once employed by and reported to Rangers hating cünt face Murdoch McLennan when at The Telegraph

I’d be interested to know who this 3rd party are and how they negotiated £500k off the top of the total deal
3rd party was: https://www.sportcollective.com/#

Their background seems to check out ok as far as I can tell. Can’t see a reason why they would have been needed though, in light of the revelation that MacLennan has previously worked with the cinch CEO and could have brought them on board himself.

Our board will know exactly what has happened throughout, and I think we need to trust them on this.
 
Back
Top