Hes a fat mentally challenged fucking weaselSo, who are we to trust?
Rod Mackenzie?
Hes a fat mentally challenged fucking weaselSo, who are we to trust?
Rod Mackenzie?
If they have got this wrong what makes you think the other results weren't made up or have ever been accurate, why wasn't it a transparent vote. Who was the neutral adjudicator?Does not make any difference anyway 10-2
Here’s hoping Dundee have the courage of their convictions and keep with the vote, and not to be coerced by the cabal.Dundee claim they submitted their voting slip to spfl which was a NO vote.
The SPFL claim they didn’t receive the voting slip.
SPFL and Celtic are now trying to coerce Dundee to change their mind and vote YES
They really are absolute scumDundee claim they submitted their voting slip to spfl which was a NO vote.
The SPFL claim they didn’t receive the voting slip.
SPFL and Celtic are now trying to coerce Dundee to change their mind and vote YES
Quelle surprise.Dundee claim they submitted their voting slip to spfl which was a NO vote.
The SPFL claim they didn’t receive the voting slip.
SPFL and Celtic are now trying to coerce Dundee to change their mind and vote YES
Dundee claim they submitted their voting slip to spfl which was a NO vote.
The SPFL claim they didn’t receive the voting slip.
SPFL and Celtic are now trying to coerce Dundee to change their mind and vote YES
I would hope so, they had a decent chance to come up with the playoffs. Any restructure would have them in the Championship still but no doubt a larger league...so their split of the pot is diluted. They have nothing to gain from this, Caley I can see the bribe of we'll let the top 2 up. No integrity but I can see that situation. What can they possibly entice Dundee with?Here’s hoping Dundee have the courage of their convictions and keep with the vote, and not to be coerced by the cabal.
so the spfl failed thenDundee claim they submitted their voting slip to spfl which was a NO vote.
The SPFL claim they didn’t receive the voting slip.
SPFL and Celtic are now trying to coerce Dundee to change their mind and vote YES
Exactly!Nothing official should've been published until every single one of the 42 votes were in.
You wouldn't get a jury member at a murder trial coming out to speak to the press and saying "Most of us think he's done it but a few are still making their minds up. Catch ye's for now"
Dundee claim they submitted their voting slip to spfl which was a NO vote.
The SPFL claim they didn’t receive the voting slip.
SPFL and Celtic are now trying to coerce Dundee to change their mind and vote YES
The SPFL and SFA allowed that mob to intimidate refs so badly that the officials went on strike. That they faced no punishment for that is still staggering. They knew then that it was they that controlled Scottish football.
Imagine that ineptitude got Hearts relegated, shameful from all concerned. Apart from our own club who have been magnificent, trying to distribute prize money to keep clubs afloat and buy time to make irreversible decisionsJordan got it wrong RE hearts , they voted after 5PM. He’s updated his tweet
"It is very important that clubs consider carefully the resolution and we are grateful to those clubs who have voted already," said an SPFL spokesperson.
Who do you want them released by? wouldn't trust the words from the SPFLFinding it very odd why sequences of events are being "leaked" on here and not announced officially?
Preaching to the converted BP
The point I was making is that Scottish Football is at it's lowest ebb in terms of Sponsorship, TV deals, etc. The only upside has been our exploits in Europe over the last couple of seasons which has helped drag the co-efficient out of the dirt and getting another spot in the CL in 2 seasons time.
Stuff like this only further re-inforces the joke status of our League.
Dundee claim they submitted their voting slip to spfl which was a NO vote.
The SPFL claim they didn’t receive the voting slip.
SPFL and Celtic are now trying to coerce Dundee to change their mind and vote YES
i think what he's getting at is that the bassas are at itDoes not make any difference anyway 10-2
Charles Paterson from SSN -
It appears that there may be “a technical question-mark” over the competence of Dundee’s no vote”..
Charles Paterson from SSN -
It appears that there may be “a technical question-mark” over the competence of Dundee’s no vote”..
This has been a truly shameful day for Scottish football, due to 1 teams proposal to be awarded a title. Clubs have been coearsed and threatened to pass a resolution on the day the highest death count occurred of the Covid virus. Mr Doncaster & Mr McKenzie must resign as their positions are untainable added to the shambolic failure to record accurate data from 42 clubs. This escapade goes beyond belief.Things are bad when they don’t even try to hide this. So confident that nothing will happen they are blatant. Hopefully the club all over this.
Did Hearts just try to throw us under the bus by delaying their vote under the assumption that Hivs and the sheep would vote "no" and they would have the leverage of a casting vote at 8-3 surely not
What dafuq does that mean?Charles Paterson from SSN -
It appears that there may be “a technical question-mark” over the competence of Dundee’s no vote”..
Charles Paterson (@charlesp_sky) | Twitter
The latest Tweets from Charles Paterson (@charlesp_sky). @SkySportsNews Usually found near a football ground ⚽ Dreaming of the golf course ⛳️ Also on Instagram . Edinburgh, Scotlandtwitter.com
It's not meant to make sense..It's meant to make Celtic champions.None of this makes sense
Professional crooksWhat dafuq does that mean?
Our resolution went from being ‘dismissed as incompetent’ to being an ‘ineffective plan’ today depending on what outlet you read. Now a vote has a technical question mark over it? Does that mean that the 5pm deadline was in fact, binding after all? Or was it just a glorified opinion poll?
F**ckin’ amateurs.
Too true mate. Niccolo Machiavelli was straight as a f**kin’ arrow in comparison to these cnuts.Professional crooks
What dafuq does that mean?
Our resolution went from being ‘dismissed as incompetent’ to being an ‘ineffective plan’ today depending on what outlet you read. Now a vote has a technical question mark over it? Does that mean that the 5pm deadline was in fact, binding after all? Or was it just a glorified opinion poll?
F**ckin’ amateurs.
You’re right Grigo. I was meaning that they are so safe in the sense of being untouchable as to descend into amateurism without a care in the world. It doesn’t matter what is brought against them, but they dismiss it with impunity - conflicts of interest, incompetence, corruption - it doesn’t matter a jot. It’s so bent and transparently so, that they can afford to be seen to be being rank amateurs and it doesn’t impact on the final outcome.You’re being kind calling them amateurs mate. I’d suggest fraudsters.
%^*& off!! How convenient.Charles Paterson from SSN -
It appears that there may be “a technical question-mark” over the competence of Dundee’s no vote”..
I've heard u can get piles sitting in drafts :-oIn fairness Hearts did forget to order seats for a stand. Probably sitting in drafts.
Needs to be unanimous across all 4 leagues mate , one league says no then it falls throughWhat happens here though? The premiership is 10-2 if Hearts get the vote through, without being coerced into changing it. It only needed 9 votes in favour? But the championship looks like it will not get the 8 votes they need? What happens then?
You’re right Grigo. I was meaning that they are so safe in the sense of being untouchable as to descend into amateurism without a care in the world. It doesn’t matter what is brought against them, but they dismiss it with impunity - conflicts of interest, incompetence, corruption - it doesn’t matter a jot. It’s so bent and transparently so, that they can afford to be seen to be being rank amateurs and it doesn’t impact on the final outcome.
This vote and re what I mention above, got me wondering earlier about which clubs instruct Harper Macleod to act on their behalf other than the charlies? Motherwell certainly did in the past but I don’t know if they still do. I wonder if any other clubs, particularly Premier League ones, do?
Needs to be unanimous across all 4 leagues mate , one league says no then it falls through