Elder55
Well-Known Member
For a number of years now the SPFL have proven to be incompetent on many levels eg Securing inadequate financial levels of Sponsorship, assisting a few Clubs with ‘loans’, showing blatant bias towards/against Clubs, spending Membership money on a ‘bogus’ inquiry into themselves!! There are many more examples, however, despite all of this who exactly authorises the exorbitant Salaries & Bonus packages Paid to the Board?
I suspect it’s the members, if that is the case then will they have the right to review the Remuneration packages to reflect the recent downturn in income?
I suspect it’s the members, if that is the case then will they have the right to review the Remuneration packages to reflect the recent downturn in income?
Last edited: