Spiers latest podcast - the history of Celtic - I think we can guarantee there's a large part of it he won't be touching with a bargepole

monkey magic said:
Celtc were founded by a sectarian priest and other wealthy Catholic bigots. They had a stadium built before they even had a team, which they then created by financially bribing the top players in Scotland to leave their respective clubs, notably Hibs. Paying players for their services was illegal back then when the game was strictly amateur. Just don't expect Spiers to mention the truth regarding that cesspit and its " moral values ".
Click to expand...

Couldn’t agree more.

Hibs had a section on their website about the creation of Celtic, how they stole their team and they went out of business as a result. For Hibs it was a charitable cause, for Celtic it was a money making scheme.

You’ll probably know about the origins of the league than me, but from what I’ve read, it was an amateur sport (‘to play for the sake of playing’ as the Queens Park motto states) in Scotland before Celtic came along and turned into a capitalist venture. Might want to tell that to the Green Brigade who see the club as a socialist one! The great irony.
 
Bowery Boy said:
Jeanette Findlay on soon to talk about how poor Catholic boys are victimised in court. Watch this space.
Click to expand...
If this transpires, you clearly need to mind your p’s and q’s as to what you post on threads pertaining to his platform. You’re only giving the despicable arse ideas.
 
Johnny Yen said:
If it was free maybe, they aren’t going to pay money for it.
Click to expand...
ive got to disagree there they give plenty to phil ofthegullibles even when not one of his predictions have came to light
they simply will pay for any negative news on rangers its like a drug to them
 
BIG JAI said:
ive got to disagree there they give plenty to phil ofthegullibles even when not one of his predictions have came to light
they simply will pay for any negative news on Rangers its like a drug to them
Click to expand...

There’s a bit of a difference between Spiers and mad Phil.

Phil just makes up continuous shite and spouts constant derogatory stuff about us on a daily basis.
 
TCWNS1872 said:
If this transpires, you clearly need to mind your p’s and q’s as to what you post on threads pertaining to his platform. You’re only giving the despicable arse ideas.
Click to expand...
He's way beyond parody these days. He'll have plenty of ideas - no one is listening.
 
You won't hear a podcast on Rangers songs and culture because these bigots don't accept our culture as being legimate.
 
Johnny Yen said:
No he doesn’t.

He writes pish about us occasionally but he doesn’t blog and tweet about us daily like the mad one.
Click to expand...
he posts the same amount of pish and lies about us the the OAP killer does
what speirs has written about us has reached more people and had a more detrimental effect on us than anything phil the prick ever could
but yeah you keep trying to defend him ffs
 
That's like trying to polish a turd.

Wonder how much of their history will be conveniently 'forgotten' about
 
BIG JAI said:
he posts the same amount of pish and lies about us the the OAP killer does
what speirs has written about us has reached more people and had a more detrimental effect on us than anything phil the prick ever could
but yeah you keep trying to defend him ffs
Click to expand...

Spiers is a cretin but it’s hysterical nonsense to say he posts same amount of stuff as mad Phil.

He apparently had an article praising Rangers at the weekend which drew mass derision from the filth, a quick glance at his twitter, literally dozens of tweets and retweets, few mention Rangers.

How does that compare to mad Phil.
 
because you said he posted a few tweets over the weekend where he didnt mention us (i'll take your word for that as i and im sure most other rangers fans dont follow him) but that doesnt mean he hasnt written the same in fact probably more lies than ill phil about us (remember the childless one has only been going for less than a decade the smelly one a lot longer)
but again all you can do is defend him i i didnt know better....
 
It’s only a little part of their overall existence that will be ignored, oh, let’s say maybe half a century?
 
Wonder if this informative podcast will cover their histroy of

1) introducing sectarianism into the game in Scotland the moment they were formed?
2) their 40 year cover up of appalling child abuse offences?
 
Which part of their history do you mean? The rampant pedophilia, the racism, the anti Semitism or the unwavering support of a certain terrorist organization?
 
mdingwall said:
His beloved Tic - complete with Scotland's face of bigotry - Angela Haggerty.

Screen-Shot-2020-09-21-at-10-58-19.png
Click to expand...
 
Marfc_84 said:
I'm still trying to work out the reasoning for this.

'Join me every 4.2 days...'
Click to expand...

Hear what I've got to say every 4 days or so?

Im struggling to get my head round how he thought this would be something people are wanting? Unless im being naive and he has some massive following of people desperate to hear his opinions on football matters.

I'd hazard a guess that his subscribers will be in the low hundreds, very low.
 
Hammy said:
Couldn’t agree more.

Hibs had a section on their website about the creation of Celtic, how they stole their team and they went out of business as a result. For Hibs it was a charitable cause, for Celtic it was a money making scheme.

You’ll probably know about the origins of the league than me, but from what I’ve read, it was an amateur sport (‘to play for the sake of playing’ as the Queens Park motto states) in Scotland before Celtic came along and turned into a capitalist venture. Might want to tell that to the Green Brigade who see the club as a socialist one! The great irony.
Click to expand...
Celtic are the MK Dons to Hibernians Wimbledon.
 
Spiers empathising with and supporting child abusers ? No surprise there with his sympathetic comments on the Hearts player and under age lassies.
 
Forgive me gaffer but do we really need a thread every time this waster produces a new episode?

There are enough threads on that lot on here as it is.
 
Having followed him out of a doorway once, I can confirm he actually really does smell. Oh and he had his BBC Scotland rain jacket on at the time, just in case anyone needed to know who he worked for.

The place he was in at the time was not in any way related to his kid-on journalism, for clarity.
 
mdingwall said:
"Is Peter Lawwell the new David Murray?"

Well, Peter is a club employee and Chief Executive. Murray was a vastly wealthy self-made man who was majority shareholder in the club. So, no, he can't be. It's a question only a halfwit could frame.
Click to expand...
Is this cretin actually charging people money for this utter nonsense.
 
Paulski54 said:
A mentally challenged apologist and a prick to boot.
Click to expand...

Has always been the way of the Odious Creep.

Around 2001/02ish, fat Matt cokehead McGlone was expelled from the marital home by ra wife. Homeless Matt accepted an invitation from ra Bhoy in Corduroy to share Chez Spiersy for several blissful weeks.

The oddest of odd couples was a symbiotic relationship. During McGlone's five year tenure as a columnist on Ra Sellik View, he ran an end of season poll - continued over from his 'zine, 'Ra Alternative View'.

One of the categories (and I'm being serious here) was - 'Most Objective Journalist on matters Sellik' - The Paedophile Apologist won this award from the readers of Ra Sellik View five years in a row.

I can only imagine a well practised Matt provided Spiers with the required amount of jobby jabbing. Bottom sex provision to a bottom feeder for accommodation.

A somewhat botanical 'Summer of Love' if you like :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Latest posts

Back
Top