Sportscene -blatant data inconsistencies

Roguetrader

Active Member
Just watched the highlights and astonished at the data inconsistencies they have just broadcast ( I shouldn’t be surprised really )
On programme stats : possession Gers 53% Hamilton 47% ( no chance!)
Attempts Gers 10 - Hamilton 5 .
And this one really takes he biscuit : Corners Gers 4 - Hamilton 2 .

Compare that to the website ;
Possession -Gers 62% - Hamilton 38%
Attempts -Gers 15 - Hamilton 2
Corners - Gers 22 - Hamilton 2

You couldn’t make this bias up !! Even Rob said on commentary that it was corner 21 !!
 
Just watched the highlights and astonished at the data inconsistencies they have just broadcast ( I shouldn’t be surprised really )
On programme stats : possession Gers 53% Hamilton 47% ( no chance!)
Attempts Gers 10 - Hamilton 5 .
And this one really takes he biscuit : Corners Gers 4 - Hamilton 2 .

Compare that to the website ;
Possession -Gers 62% - Hamilton 38%
Attempts -Gers 15 - Hamilton 2
Corners - Gers 22 - Hamilton 2

You couldn’t make this bias up !! Even Rob said on commentary that it was corner 21 !!
Read my post on laffertys plays for celtic you must have watched it with the sound down lol
 
Are we surprised? Papers and media make stuff up about us all the time.

Skybet had us at 70% possession, 8 on target, 6 off, 22 corners.

Hamilton, 1 shot on target, 0 off and 2 corners.

That will be accurate.
 
Blatant?, it’s hard to tell, they are that incompetent. When you consider the two mature catalogue models they roll out for football expertise, you have to wonder.
 
Just watched the highlights and astonished at the data inconsistencies they have just broadcast ( I shouldn’t be surprised really )
On programme stats : possession Gers 53% Hamilton 47% ( no chance!)
Attempts Gers 10 - Hamilton 5 .
And this one really takes he biscuit : Corners Gers 4 - Hamilton 2 .

Compare that to the website ;
Possession -Gers 62% - Hamilton 38%
Attempts -Gers 15 - Hamilton 2
Corners - Gers 22 - Hamilton 2

You couldn’t make this bias up !! Even Rob said on commentary that it was corner 21 !!

I must have missed the 38%, today was probably the most possession I think we've had.
 
Just watched the highlights and astonished at the data inconsistencies they have just broadcast ( I shouldn’t be surprised really )
On programme stats : possession Gers 53% Hamilton 47% ( no chance!)
Attempts Gers 10 - Hamilton 5 .
And this one really takes he biscuit : Corners Gers 4 - Hamilton 2 .

Compare that to the website ;
Possession -Gers 62% - Hamilton 38%
Attempts -Gers 15 - Hamilton 2
Corners - Gers 22 - Hamilton 2

You couldn’t make this bias up !! Even Rob said on commentary that it was corner 21 !!

You missed another couple of their stat's:

Attendance: 1,727
Rangers had 1 player booked: Gallagher.
 
Just watched the highlights and astonished at the data inconsistencies they have just broadcast ( I shouldn’t be surprised really )
On programme stats : possession Gers 53% Hamilton 47% ( no chance!)
Attempts Gers 10 - Hamilton 5 .
And this one really takes he biscuit : Corners Gers 4 - Hamilton 2 .

Compare that to the website ;
Possession -Gers 62% - Hamilton 38%
Attempts -Gers 15 - Hamilton 2
Corners - Gers 22 - Hamilton 2

You couldn’t make this bias up !! Even Rob said on commentary that it was corner 21 !!
The main stat was right 1-0 to us and we are top of the league, they can’t spin that.
 
yep, my phone at half time looked like this...

16honiq.jpg
 
Just watched the highlights and astonished at the data inconsistencies they have just broadcast ( I shouldn’t be surprised really )
On programme stats : possession Gers 53% Hamilton 47% ( no chance!)
Attempts Gers 10 - Hamilton 5 .
And this one really takes he biscuit : Corners Gers 4 - Hamilton 2 .

Compare that to the website ;
Possession -Gers 62% - Hamilton 38%
Attempts -Gers 15 - Hamilton 2
Corners - Gers 22 - Hamilton 2

You couldn’t make this bias up !! Even Rob said on commentary that it was corner 21 !!
When they can say the attendance was 1100 or so, you can guess they’re at it or plain dumb.
 
Are we surprised? Papers and media make stuff up about us all the time.

Skybet had us at 70% possession, 8 on target, 6 off, 22 corners.

Hamilton, 1 shot on target, 0 off and 2 corners.

That will be accurate.
Reads pretty close to me.
McGregor wouldn’t have needed a shower after this game.
A couple of throat pastilles but no need for a shower.
 
You missed another couple of their stat's:

Attendance: 1,727
Rangers had 1 player booked: Gallagher.

You probably couldn't get their stats more wrong if you deliberately tried to. Absolutely incompetent. Stewart claimed that the Lego eater's challenge wasn't anything more than a Yellow with Thompson claiming that Lafferty led the line well for Celtc. When growing up I used to look forward to Sportscene but now it has become amateur hour.
 
It's laughable how bad that programme is. Amateur hour! Honestly they are utter Sh*te.
Without access to our club they are being made to look ridiculous.
 
Just watched the highlights and astonished at the data inconsistencies they have just broadcast ( I shouldn’t be surprised really )
On programme stats : possession Gers 53% Hamilton 47% ( no chance!)
Attempts Gers 10 - Hamilton 5 .
And this one really takes he biscuit : Corners Gers 4 - Hamilton 2 .

Compare that to the website ;
Possession -Gers 62% - Hamilton 38%
Attempts -Gers 15 - Hamilton 2
Corners - Gers 22 - Hamilton 2

You couldn’t make this bias up !! Even Rob said on commentary that it was corner 21 !!

Why not make a complaint to the BBC and say you are worried that we aren't getting fair coverage due to their boycott.

Complete lack of standards when it comes to reporting us.

https://ssl.bbc.co.uk/complaints/forms/?lang=en&reset=&uid=443594733
 
Makes you wonder, how did they manage to get it so wrong?

I mean what actually happened?

Must have been somebody’s last day.
 
It's quite clearly the stats from another game FFS.

It's just amateur. Wasn't deliberate, but it's only going to get worse as the BBC's budget tightens.
 
Pretty sure the tv companies are all provided with scores and stats by another company, if they get it wrong then everyone will.
 
It's quite clearly the stats from another game FFS.

It's just amateur. Wasn't deliberate, but it's only going to get worse as the BBC's budget tightens.

Got sod all to do with their budget. It's just sheer incompetence and a total lack of professionalism. Pathetic third rate broadcasting.
 
Got sod all to do with their budget. It's just sheer incompetence and a total lack of professionalism. Pathetic third rate broadcasting.
Of course it has something to do with their budget.

A higher standard of editor/ producers/ directors can be attracted with more money. BBC Scotland have a tight budget BBC Sport Scotland is even tighter. Are you just expecting them to just 'be better'? It's the bottom of the pile in terms of importance. Most of it is probably done by interns/ kids out of uni to give them experience.

So yes it is incompetence and it is a total lack of professionalism, but that's budgetary constraints.
 
Just watched the highlights and astonished at the data inconsistencies they have just broadcast ( I shouldn’t be surprised really )
On programme stats : possession Gers 53% Hamilton 47% ( no chance!)
Attempts Gers 10 - Hamilton 5 .
And this one really takes he biscuit : Corners Gers 4 - Hamilton 2 .

Compare that to the website ;
Possession -Gers 62% - Hamilton 38%
Attempts -Gers 15 - Hamilton 2
Corners - Gers 22 - Hamilton 2

You couldn’t make this bias up !! Even Rob said on commentary that it was corner 21 !!

Complete incompetence. I found it hilarious.
 
Are we surprised? Papers and media make stuff up about us all the time.

Skybet had us at 70% possession, 8 on target, 6 off, 22 corners.

Hamilton, 1 shot on target, 0 off and 2 corners.

That will be accurate.

Sky Sports also had us as 2-0 up 10 minutes in :D
 
Back
Top