Bangersbc
Well-Known Member
These are the boys to take us to 56:
Mcgregor (McLaughlin/McCrorie)
Tavernier (Zukowski)
Goldson (Balogun)
Helander (Simpson/King)
Barisic (Bassey)
Ramsey (Lundstrum/Davis/Ofobohr)
Kamara (Jack/Sands)
Amad (Wright)
Aribo (Hagi/Arfield/Lowry)
Kent (Sakala)
Morelos (Roofe/Itten)
Kept all the first 11 and I think we can all agree have added 2 first team starters to the weakest areas. You can see why Lundstram was being offered out - we are stacked in the middle now but Ramsey is the best of the bunch on paper so no complaints about the addition.
I wonder if Simpson stayed because we couldn't secure a replacement in time (with hearts and vitesse playing hardball). Letting him leave would have left us short at the back undoubtedly, and contrary to popular opinion he is actually preferable to B team youth.
Are we all happy with the strength and depth of the squad?
Mcgregor (McLaughlin/McCrorie)
Tavernier (Zukowski)
Goldson (Balogun)
Helander (Simpson/King)
Barisic (Bassey)
Ramsey (Lundstrum/Davis/Ofobohr)
Kamara (Jack/Sands)
Amad (Wright)
Aribo (Hagi/Arfield/Lowry)
Kent (Sakala)
Morelos (Roofe/Itten)
Kept all the first 11 and I think we can all agree have added 2 first team starters to the weakest areas. You can see why Lundstram was being offered out - we are stacked in the middle now but Ramsey is the best of the bunch on paper so no complaints about the addition.
I wonder if Simpson stayed because we couldn't secure a replacement in time (with hearts and vitesse playing hardball). Letting him leave would have left us short at the back undoubtedly, and contrary to popular opinion he is actually preferable to B team youth.
Are we all happy with the strength and depth of the squad?