Susan Aitken’s (SNP cllr) tweet re fanzone.

Cutty/Young said:
You seriously think he will be found guilty, he'll not spend a day in the jail.
Click to expand...
no, what i am saying is he will not do a day inside,charges will be dropped or some technicality will get him off,these people look after their own, how many snp members have been at it and nothing has came of it.
 
Inveruriebear said:
I know a few who should be told to never ever darken our stadium or games again as they said Indy is more important than the Club and Team ! They will continue to vote SNP to achieve indy and of that affects the club then so be it as when we get indy we can always vote for another party who won’t be seen to be against the club !
Click to expand...
I had a friend with a similar view.
Despite them being so anti-Rangers, this guy thinks it okay, independence at all costs.
You‘ll have noticed the “had” bit.
I couldn’t handle it.
Still friendly with his wife though. :)
 
Opalescent said:
Naive? Not at all...why would I believe it's to be taken literally?

The SNP aren't a banned organisation are they, they're a UK political party.

ISIS & IRA are banned terrorist organisations, the KKK is racist organisation guilty of promoting hate. WTF would they conform with the message of Everyone, Anyone?

I'm struggling to believe you're so ignorant that I'm having to spell it out to you.

To be clear, I'm not and SNP voter or supporter. However, when you have other Bears saying SNP voters should be banned then you can see where we a have a problem.
Click to expand...
Agreed.
That is the problem.
Rangers supporters should not be SNP voters.
You cannot vote SNP, full in the knowledge that they actively damage the club, and claim to have Rangers at heart.
 
bilkobear said:
Who investigated her?
The SNP have infiltrated the State so deeply that perhaps any investigation isn't worth the paper.
This is a country that couldn't prosecute a load of Tims for hanging sectarian effigies when the entire nation were witnesses to the offence on both National Television and every media and press outlet that reports news!

Communist China could take a few lessons from modern Scotland.
Click to expand...

Scotland is a fascist state.
 
tazzabear said:
Agreed.
That is the problem.
Rangers supporters should not be SNP voters.
You cannot vote SNP, full in the knowledge that they actively damage the club, and claim to have Rangers at heart.
Click to expand...

Well... Maybe these supporters feel the need to put their country ahead of their football team.

However ludicrous that may seem to the majority on here, myself included, I can understand that if they feel so passionately about independence and that it is right for Scotland, why they would do it.

Being a Rangers supporter doesn't define you as a Unionist, or a protestant. A Rangers supporter can be anything they want.

Most of us might not like it, but tough.
 
Opalescent said:
Well... Maybe these supporters feel the need to put their country ahead of their football team.

However ludicrous that may seem to the majority on here, myself included, I can understand that if they feel so passionately about independence and that it is right for Scotland, why they would do it.

Being a Rangers supporter doesn't define you as a Unionist, or a protestant. A Rangers supporter can be anything they want.

Most of us might not like it, but tough.
Click to expand...
I‘m only asking that they be a Rangers supporter and do nothing that'll harm the club.
 
BlueSevenTwo said:
Still awaiting the first SNP voting hipster who claim to be a Rangers fan to comment on this thread.
You know who you are , hang your heads in shame.
Click to expand...

they didn’t say fcuk all when Derek McKay got caught out , said fcuk all when the snp/yessers marched arm in arm with Irish republicans , said fcuk all when snp hierarchy drank in a pro Celtic pub but blanked rangers pubs , said fcuk all when all manner of snp MPs , msps and councillors have taken a kick at our club .

they put their party and cause before rangers , they think they are fans but they’re nothing but mentally challenged apologists and they know who they are .
 
Stuhercules said:
Well well, well what a surprise. The "independant" Scottish Standards Commission members are appointed by yip you've guessed it, the current SNP government.

Hand picked by the SNP to investigate the SNP.
Welcome to Scotland 2020.


Taken from Wikipedia

The Commission was established under the Ethical Standards in Public Life etc. (Scotland) Act 2000. The Commission Members are appointed by the Scottish Parliament but are expected to be independent of government in its workings. The current convener is Kevin Dunion.
Click to expand...

My dislike of the SNP can match anyone's on here, however the statement you have quoted, states Scottish Parliament not Scottish Government, which suggests they were appointed by a cross party group selection of SMP's
 
Last edited:
bilkobear said:
Who investigated her?
The SNP have infiltrated the State so deeply that perhaps any investigation isn't worth the paper.
This is a country that couldn't prosecute a load of Tims for hanging sectarian effigies when the entire nation were witnesses to the offence on both National Television and every media and press outlet that reports news!

Communist China could take a few lessons from modern Scotland.
Click to expand...

You get the council and Government you vote for. It isn’t possible for the Nats to get the level of domination in Glasgow without a lot of Rangers fans voting for them multiple times.

Amazes me that Rangers fans can vote SNP.
 
Opalescent said:
Well... Maybe these supporters feel the need to put their country ahead of their football team.

However ludicrous that may seem to the majority on here, myself included, I can understand that if they feel so passionately about independence and that it is right for Scotland, why they would do it.

Being a Rangers supporter doesn't define you as a Unionist, or a protestant. A Rangers supporter can be anything they want.

Most of us might not like it, but tough.
Click to expand...
Could a jew have been a national socialist in Hitler's Germany, even in the very early days?
I don't mean was it possible, because any person suffering from mental instability is capable of anything, however, I am saying would it have been compatible for an aware and sane jew to have been a national socialist in Hitler's Germany, and if not, why not?
 
bilkobear said:
Could a jew have been a national socialist in Hitler's Germany, even in the very early days?
I don't mean was it possible, because any person suffering from mental instability is capable of anything, however, I am saying would it have been compatible for an aware and sane jew to have been a national socialist in Hitler's Germany, and if not, why not?
Click to expand...

I could give you a serious response, however with you being a climate change denier, I'm going invoke Godwin's Law straight off the bat.

Cheerio!
 
Opalescent said:
I could give you a serious response, however with you being a climate change denier, I'm going invoke Godwin's Law straight off the bat.

Cheerio!
Click to expand...
No, I am not a climate change denier, I am a sceptic about what drives the current change in the climate which is just much the same as the climate change throughout the history of the planet, driven regardless of man's puny existence.
But let's not let facts get in the way of a wise dodge, because in dodging my question you were wise, because to answer it makes a mockery of your statement above.
But I am not one for mocking. ;)
 
I guess I can post it in this thread instead of a new one.

I complained to the Standards Office about John Masons insistance that if you want him to deal with you, you must support the NATz party and NOT be an Orangeman or Unionist. We all know the story.

Anyroadup.........I got a reply from them today rejecting my complaint. 2 pages of it. Basically this:

Public Standards

Code of Conduct for Members of the Scottish Parliament

Complaint against John Mason MSP​



Thank you for your complaint about John Mason MSP.I wish to advise that, on the basis of the information before me, I have decided to close your complaint. I do not consider the complaint to be admissible in terms of the Scottish Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Act 2002 (“the Act”). I set out my reasons below.



Your complaint



Your complaint referred to a tweet by Mr Mason on 15 January in regard to engaging with and representing constituents.



Summary of reasons for decision



Section 8 of the Code sets out the rules which MSPs must follow when they are engaging with constituents. (These rules are reproduced for your information in the next section of this letter.) However, Section 9 of the Code then continues to exclude complaints regarding Section 8 from the Commissioners remit, as they are instead to be referred to the Presiding Officer.

If you wish to pursue the matter, you should write to the Presiding Officer at the Scottish Parliament, Edinburgh EH99 1SP, stating that your complaint concerns engaging with constituents, with a request that it be addressed.
Click to expand...

I have now taken it further with the Presiding Officers office and let`s see what happens.

I presume anyone else who complained got the same long-winded pish and gobbeldygook reply.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Latest posts

Back
Top