Wordy_Rappinghood
Well-Known Member
Hutton wasn't around long enough but he was a far, far better defender and Tav's equal as an athlete.
He was Tottenham's first choice right-back for the majority of the 2010–11 season, often being preferred to Croatian international Vedran Ćorluka on the right hand side of the Spurs defence. Hutton was also an important fixture in Tottenham's 2010–11 UEFA Champions League campaign that saw them reach the quarter-finals, including being part of the team that produced a memorable 3–1 victory over European champions Internazionale.[28] However, his season ended in April, after suffering a knee injury, which ruled him
Is that really true though?
Tavs contribution in Europe over the past 5 years has been fantastic. He led us to a European final and was named in the team of the year.
If Tav was younger he would have been hot property.
If he’s injured in April and not available it’s a bit disingenuous to quote 38 games, let’s say he played 70% of games when he was available. Personally, I think he’s holding that shirt. Fact is he played for a top EPL side.He played 21 of 38 league games for them in 2010/11, that's not that much more than only half of their league games and was already out the squad by the time he was injured.
He only played 4 games for them in Europe that season, and again was on the bench by the time he was injured.
So while his injury was unfortunate, he didn't really hold down a place at a top EPL side.
To the extent he was sold by the summers end of that season. It isn't like the manager was desperate for his return to the side after his injury
Is the correct answer.Of course there is debate, Gary Stevens had six years with us and won six titles, he was an outstanding full back who was an England internationalist, a level above Tav.
If he’s injured in April and not available it’s a bit disingenuous to quote 38 games, let’s say he played 70% of games when he was available. Personally, I think he’s holding that shirt. Fact is he played for a top EPL side.
The eras they have played in (in football generally but particularly relating to Rangers) are completely different. Stevens was a top full back in his day, and his standing in football as a whole was higher, but if we are just comparing honours then Scott Nisbet was a better right back than Tavernier.No he isn't.
Gary Stevens:
Everton
Rangers
- Football League First Division: 1984–85, 1986–87
- FA Cup: 1983–84
- FA Charity Shield: 1984, 1985
- European Cup Winners' Cup: 1984–85
At full back?Tav all day. I'd have Ricksen before Hutton.
I love Tav and he’s obviously the better of the 2 ref RFC careerHutton had a great 6 months and an average rest of his Rangers career.
It’s a bit like the EPL right back thread we had where the only real answer was Gary Neville.
It’s Tav all day long
If Tac was anywhere near as good as Stevens we'd have been fending off or cashing in on a big money bid from a top EPL side. Him never garnering much interest down south is a pretty good indicator that he's not close to Stevens' or Jardine's standard.The eras they have played in (in football generally but particularly relating to Rangers) are completely different. Stevens was a top full back in his day, and his standing in football as a whole was higher, but if we are just comparing honours then Scott Nisbet was a better right back than Tavernier.
Stevens was never anywhere near as important to the Rangers teams he played in as Tavernier has been – he didn’t have to be. Tav has scored as many goals since November as Stevens managed in his six years.
If Tac was anywhere near as good as Stevens we'd have been fending off or cashing in on a big money bid from a top EPL side. Him never garnering much interest down south is a pretty good indicator that he's not close to Stevens' or Jardine's standard.
That's why he was the better player a team came for him with big money that tells us who is the best of the twoHutton had an unbelievable spell which got him a big money move to Spurs.
Nah Gary Stevens contributed far more - IMO.In terms of individual contribution to the club, Tavernier is the best right back since Sandy Jardine. Don’t think there is much debate to be had about that.
Agreed, Hutton performed more than admirably in the EPL and to me is a better overall RB than Tav, but the latter did more for Rangers on the park.That's why he was the better player a team came for him with big money that tells us who is the best of the two
Would go Tav but Hutton’s patch of form for us was phenomenal. Stuttgart at Ibrox sticks out for me.
Comparing 6 months to 6 years ?Following on from the “Favourite Gers XI” thread.
Noticed a lot of folks who didn’t experience the Sandy Jardine/ Stevens era, flipped between Tav and Hutton for the right back position.
In terms of tenure and contribution to the Rangers story, my choice would be Tav.
However in terms of raw ability, what’s the thoughts?
Watching that legends game yesterday reminded me of what a fantastic full back Alan Hutton was. Unplayable on his day.
Gary Stevens was well ahead of Tav on ability, both defensively and as an attacking threat. Stevens played in a team far superior to the present team but his contribution to that team was every bit of important than Tavs is today.In terms of individual contribution to the club, Tavernier is the best right back since Sandy Jardine. Don’t think there is much debate to be had about that.
Giving the world champions the run around at Hampden. Doing similar with quality opposition in the Champions League.Can't think of many players who hit the heights Hutton did in 2007.
Tav has been more consistent over the piece.
The question isn’t contribution to rangers. Think it’s pretty clear that Tav holds that position.Comparing 6 months to 6 years ?
Still Tav for me.
Giving the world champions the run around at Hampden. Doing similar with quality opposition in the Champions League.
In spite of the fact he didn’t retain his focus and push on from that, he had a decent enough career in the Premier League, even won a medal with Spurs which is almost unheard of
Anyway I chose Hutton for his peak, clearly not his longevity at Rangers. And he could defend too which is always useful. And I’d just feel way more confident of him giving a good showing in a must win game.
I remember this game. Someone in the ground was giving him dogs abuse, then he scored and the guy refusing to budge declared it “a fluke”Hutton was a whipping boy when he broke through because he didn't reach the levels of Stevie Smith on the other side, it was quite late on when it turned around for Hutton. I remember him scoring in Europe & that was where the opinion on him started to change.
He also played at a time where FB's didn't always need to go forward as often & were well covered. I think his defensive weaknesses would've been exposed if he played in a modern-day Rangers side.
It's funny that we badger Tav for his lack of winners medals but no one really did the same with Hutton, who I think only won 1 title.
Gary Stevens was miles better than either Tav or Alan Hutton.The eras they have played in (in football generally but particularly relating to Rangers) are completely different. Stevens was a top full back in his day, and his standing in football as a whole was higher, but if we are just comparing honours then Scott Nisbet was a better right back than Tavernier.
Stevens was never anywhere near as important to the Rangers teams he played in as Tavernier has been – he didn’t have to be. Tav has scored as many goals since November as Stevens managed in his six years.
League medal Everton , ECWC winnerGary Stevens was well ahead of Tav on ability, both defensively and as an attacking threat. Stevens played in a team far superior to the present team but his contribution to that team was every bit of important than Tavs is today.
An absolutely wild take.Tav all day. I'd have Ricksen before Hutton.
I’d totally forgotten about his spell at Mallorca!Yeah, Villa fans loved him in the end. Played at the Bernabeu and Camp Nou in La Liga too!
Give me strengthStevens was never anywhere near as important to the Rangers teams he played in as Tavernier has been – he didn’t have to be. Tav has scored as many goals since November as Stevens managed in his six years.
What Hutton did in the EPL is immaterial compared to what Tav has done for Rangers.Hutton was a standout in the CL and played most of his career in the EPL. As good as Tav has been he's been at us for the majority of his career at a time the standard in our league has been at it's lowest ebb.
Doesn't take away the fact he's almost scored 100 goals as a right back
Tav was top scorer in the Europa league and drove Rangers to a major European final. Not sure what more you want in Europe from Tav tbhTav definitely better over the piece but don't think he's come near hitting how good Hutton was for Scotland and Rangers in 2007. He was genuinely unbelievable for a good bit there.
Hutton looked like he could go on to be world class at that point against Barcelona, Stuttgart, Lyon, Italy and France.
I would say that I don't think a Rangers player has looked that good against that calibre of opposition since. Morelos and Tav himself have had good moments in the Europa, but neither have done it in the big competition against sides as good as Lyon and Barcelona were back then.
Hutton was playing in the Champions League. Less said about Tav’s one go at the CL the better.In terms of individual contribution to Rangers it’s not even close between Tav and Hutton. Even Huttons immense performances in Europe were slapped aside by Tav last year.
Better than Gary Stevens and Porrini?In terms of individual contribution to the club, Tavernier is the best right back since Sandy Jardine. Don’t think there is much debate to be had about that.
Perfectly summed up. He was dominating champions league games for us. At right back.Hutton was possibly the best Rangers right back I’ve seen all round for that six month spell.
Rapid, could beat a man, great one on one defender and chipped in with assists and a few goals. More importantly, he was genuinely aggressive, and that’s something Tav and many others don’t seem to have. Especially against the filth, he hated them and you could see it in his performances.
For overall consistency and contribution though, there’s only one winner.
Miles better than porrini, it’s a tough one with Stevens and I loved him. But Tav for me. It’s hard to compare eras.Better than Gary Stevens and Porrini?
I mean that’s not what the OP asks but you fire on.What Hutton did in the EPL is immaterial compared to what Tav has done for Rangers.
Who was the better player for Rangers - it’s James Tavernier and not even close.
For us yes. Hutton played at a higher standard the majority of his career.Can't think of many players who hit the heights Hutton did in 2007.
Tav has been more consistent over the piece.