A whole lot of nothing, doesn’t address any of the points made, I mean you’ve literally addressed none of it, just taken a bunch of stats at face value with no context, which is standard for guys more interested in Tavernier than the success of Rangers, usually run about insulting people, talking about haters and hatred, being clueless while quoting numbers and blaming everyone else at the club. To his credit LegalBeagle at least tried to take my point instead of descending into that pathetic “you’re a poet/you hate the captain” crap. The fact you genuinely thought I was advocating for putting Sterling on penalties rather than making a simple point that if he was the penalty taker he’d end up with really good goal numbers, is startling. Although there are surely attacking players in the side who could produce similar conversion rates.
What you call a hatred of our captain is actually more about being sick and tired of seeing Celtic win the league, of seeing us rinsed at full back in Old Firm games, or just generally seeing us look rudderless when the pressures really on and we need to get results. But yeah spare me the condescending stuff about needing to think it through, I’ve given my arguments and I’ve given fairly thorough explanations for them. You're sticking to looking at numbers on a page and nothing more, so where’s the thought process there? Oh, and obviously no big offer is coming, no one was interested in paying good money for him when he was in his prime so why would that happen now? Maybe if you’re lucky we’ll stick with the status quo, but you can forget about us beating them to the league title. Zero hated for the guy, but I am completely fed up with seeing him lead us to minimal success, and beyond tired of seeing him get rinsed at the back.