OnlyOneAmoruso
Well-Known Member
I can't see the article on their website - has it been removed @Alcatraz Loyal?
Exactly, our articles are written by a Rangers man, so just read articles about us and ignore the ones about themThe Athletic is excellent.
Why we're posting articles written by a Celtic fan on here is beyond me.
Me too,I never read it as a dig,more an observation that its the Rangers of pre 2012 rather than the one cobbled together after getting shafted.A few people seem in a rush to be offended at anything. I personally read that comment as a positive. We've been a shadow of ourselves for the last few years, and Stevie G has made us Rangers again.
Same here,that was my take on it.A few people seem in a rush to be offended at anything. I personally read that comment as a positive. We've been a shadow of ourselves for the last few years, and Stevie G has made us Rangers again.
Hi lads,
Jordan here who covers Rangers for The Athletic.
A few mates flagged this thread up to me, so thought I'd jump in to explain.
It wasn't Kieran, the Celtic writer, who wrote the phrase as it wasn't his article. The editorial team down in London are really good and put out a brief couple of hundred words to introduce each story in the morning email. They were trying to refer to when Rangers were a dominant force but obviously didn't take into account how it would be read up here.
I've let them know about it. Apologies for that.
Hopefully those of you who have signed up are enjoying it otherwise.
Cheers!
Can someone copy in the text of the article about FCM's kitman being a mad Gerrard fan? I'm reluctant to sign up for anything with the word 'journalists' in the description.
Thanks for posting. As I said in an earlier post on this thread I signed up last week and think The Athletic is brilliant Hope it is a success!Hi lads,
Jordan here who covers Rangers for The Athletic.
A few mates flagged this thread up to me, so thought I'd jump in to explain.
It wasn't Kieran, the Celtic writer, who wrote the phrase as it wasn't his article. The editorial team down in London are really good and put out a brief couple of hundred words to introduce each story in the morning email. They were trying to refer to when Rangers were a dominant force but obviously didn't take into account how it would be read up here.
I've let them know about it. Apologies for that.
Hopefully those of you who have signed up are enjoying it otherwise.
Cheers!