The club have tip-toed round the issue.
"Everyone, Anyone" is a soft campaign dreamed up by a marketing company which, iMO shows a limited understanding of our support. It's a template, off the shelf "inclusivity" campaign as opposed to something that shows any real understanding of our predicament, or indeed the journey that many of us must complete.
I'm not condoning the singing, however, I question whether the support would be as defiant if there had been more engagement with the fans, and The Board were more vocal in defending our support from the attacks that come our way. The silence from our custodians after the Killie debacle was another slap in the face. The only statement came from C1872, well over a week later. I question their strategy of issuing things through C1872, 4lads, CoplandRoad.org et al.
Compare and contrast the other mobs response to Tom Boyd's comments.
There needs to be an honest appraisal, and admission of where we are at as a club and a support. We need to acknowledge that there may be challenges in changing a mindset or a songbook. The club should be working with groups like the UB and could take the lead in what is played over the tannoy and how we respect our history without leaving us open to punishment.
Simply, more honesty, courage and thought. Perhaps even a little more carrot and less stick.
They strike me as both embarrased and terrified of having a grown up conversation. This seems almost endemic of Scots' Protestant culture. When members of the other mob do well for themselves and join the chattering classes, they make no secret of their allegiance and their believes.
To be clear though, if we knew the consequences of the F word at European games then we should not have sung them. Asking The Board for more is in no way an excuse for our own act of self-harm.