CaptainCourageous
Well-Known Member
Yes, I'm sure he's done it a few times at Ibrox recently.
You never saw Rangers supporters calling it a bookable offence then.
Yes, I'm sure he's done it a few times at Ibrox recently.
Traynor is not paid a wage by Rangers!I was going to add this to the other thread that got pulled.......
In fact %^*& it. Play smart mention Lennon. Mention that he too suffered abuse all around the country like Morelos does and the country roundly vilified the people giving Lennon abuse. Play smart, frame it in a way that they are forced to agree. Something like
“I used to watch Scottish football and neil Lennon previously got an awful lot of abuse around the country. Neil was no shrinking violet and would sometimes give it back but I think in general referees and the media cut neil some slack at times because of the unwarranted abuse he took. I would hope the same would happen for Alfredo because he is clearly targeted by fans at every ground with abuse and missiles but so far I have yet to see anyone in the media or the game other then myself really call out the abuse Alfredo suffers”
C’mon traynor brief Gerarrd now ffs. Earn your wage.
We won’t and we CAN’T win the league with the current standard of officiating. Simple as that.
4 domestic games on the trot, 4 CLEAR penalties on Morleos not given, and a red card that would not have been brandished to anyone in an opposition jersey. In effect we’re swimming against the current with this shower of incompetents.
Traynor is not paid a wage by Rangers!
How do people still not know this???
Traynor-esque level of clumsy attempted misdirection there.Traynor is not paid a wage by Rangers!
How do people still not know this???
It's not clumsy misdirection at all. He is not employed by the club. He's an independent consultant who takes direction from the board.Traynor-esque level of clumsy attempted misdirection there.
No one, except those who think they're being clever, gives a monkey's about his terms of employment.
He's still at the club, he's still taking money, he's still adding nothing.
And if he was employed by the club he wouldn't be taking direction from the club? So, my criticism stands, how he is employed matters not.It's not clumsy misdirection at all. He is not employed by the club. He's an independent consultant who takes direction from the board.
The board are responsible for this, not him.