My post was a bit tongue in cheek mate but I stand by what I said about every manager being a gamble, even experienced ones.
We play in a backwater, but it is a unique wee backwater. There's loads of posts about different managers style of play and how they play attacking football and so on and so forth. I get that.
When our new manager, whoever that is, eventually arrives they are going to find out pretty quickly that there are plastic parks, teams that play a cup final against you every week and two banks of 5 to break down. Add in that they must win every game by at least a couple of goals and it's safe to say not a lot will have experienced that type of management.
McInnes will know all of this. It's not an endorsement for the job, I'm just putting that out there. I also think it's unfair to gauge his success against the vermin while being at Aberdeen. He wouldn't be at Aberdeen, he would be at Rangers with a massively larger budget and better players. How many games did McLeish win against the scum while he was Hibs manager? I bet it wasn't many yet he did alright at us.
I'm open to any manager but I think now we need a bit of experience and not a Beale type appointment. In saying that what if Davis goes on a run of winning games playing exciting, attacking football? Do we bin him for a more experienced guy?
One of our greatest managers was an assistant at Dundee Utd and Rangers and was given the gig. Now I've read some posts on here about that time and if the Internet was about then. People saying they would have been happy with Smith getting the job. Bollocks, this place would have went into absolute meltdown if it was about back then. A Scottish guy who'd never managed in his own right, most would have went mental if they're being honest with themselves.
What I'm trying to get across is this, nobody can say any particular manager will be brilliant, shite, or whatever because nobody knows for sure.