It would be crazy if they didn’t get an agreement to rent Hampden for at least the games against Rangers and them; they would make a fortune.The romance of Queens Park back in the top flight is certainly one I’m attracted to, but less so if they’re playing their games in someplace like Stenhousemuir or Cumbernauld.
If they can afford to rent Hampden I hope they do so.
It would be crazy if they didn’t get an agreement to rent Hampden for at least the games against Rangers and them; they would make a fortune.
It would be crazy if they didn’t get an agreement to rent Hampden for at least the games against Rangers and them; they would make a fortune.
I don’t think they can do that. I think they have to register one ground to play their home games in for the season.It would be crazy if they didn’t get an agreement to rent Hampden for at least the games against Rangers and them; they would make a fortune.
You can't just decide to play certain home games at a different ground to make more money.It would be crazy if they didn’t get an agreement to rent Hampden for at least the games against Rangers and them; they would make a fortune.
Killie won't even allow us to sell out rugby park.What’s to stop Kilmarnock or Motherwell etc deciding they then want to rent Hampden for games against us to make a bit more money?
They won’t even sell us the tickets in their own Middens hahahaWhat’s to stop Kilmarnock or Motherwell etc deciding they then want to rent Hampden for games against us to make a bit more money?
I know they don’t have many, but their fans would be apoplectic if they did that.What’s to stop Kilmarnock or Motherwell etc deciding they then want to rent Hampden for games against us to make a bit more money?
These clubs don't even want to make more money from us by giving us a bigger allocation at their own grounds, so I can't see them being interested in giving up home advantage to make more money. Their petty fans would rather watch dross every week, than have the extra income to allow them to potentially bring in a couple of new players that might just improve them.What’s to stop Kilmarnock or Motherwell etc deciding they then want to rent Hampden for games against us to make a bit more money?
The article says 1700. Having passed it regularly, I doubt it. The new stand has 6 rows and doesn't run the full length of the pitch. The pitch is supposedly the same size as Hampden.How many does lesser Hampden hold.? Would the tighter smaller playing surface not suit them better ?
Yeah. If Broomhill leave now their deal with open goal is done then it’s a certainty.Can see them playing out of Broadwood
I look forward to seeing Kilmarnock and Motherwell filling three stands there the way they do at their current homes!What’s to stop Kilmarnock or Motherwell etc deciding they then want to rent Hampden for games against us to make a bit more money?
Shawfield? Are you joking? The place is a derelict mess and, to the best of my knowledge, is destined for demolition (not that it'll take much as it's falling apart). I was in Shawfield many times to see Rangers and it was a terrible venue - terrible nightlines and view interrupted by the numerous lighting poles for the dog and speedway tracks.Yeah. If Broomhill leave now their deal with open goal is done then it’s a certainty.
I’d said in another thread, it’s a shame they can just move Broadwood to Shawfield - it would be an ideal ground share for QP and Clyde.
I did some rough maths when we played them twice at Hamden on our travels up the leagues. Not knowing policing costs etc, it wouldn’t be as much as this, but on a bums in seats versus their regular attendance for a season and additional estimated expenditures ( food, programmes, etc) they picked up approximately seven years revenue from those two games.It would be crazy if they didn’t get an agreement to rent Hampden for at least the games against Rangers and them; they would make a fortune.
I know a few QP legends, directors etc and your sums are spot on that'd exactly the number he gave meI did some rough maths when we played them twice at Hamden on our travels up the leagues. Not knowing policing costs etc, it wouldn’t be as much as this, but on a bums in seats versus their regular attendance for a season and additional estimated expenditures ( food, programmes, etc) they picked up approximately seven years revenue from those two games.
I said move Broadwood to Shawfield. ie move it brick by brick over.Shawfield? Are you joking? The place is a derelict mess and, to the best of my knowledge, is destined for demolition (not that it'll take much as it's falling apart). I was in Shawfield many times to see Rangers and it was a terrible venue - terrible nightlines and view interrupted by the numerous lighting poles for the dog and speedway tracks.
Nice work if you can get it.I know a few QP legends, directors etc and your sums are spot on that'd exactly the number he gave me
Sorry my mistake, mis-read your post, thought you'd said Broadwood OR Shawfield. I'm pretty sure the Shawfield site is earmarked for redevelopment though.I said move Broadwood to Shawfield. ie move it brick by brick over.
Just so their in no ambiguity, I don’t literally mean this should happen.
With all the house building in Oatlands that’s a certSorry my mistake, mis-read your post, thought you'd said Broadwood OR Shawfield. I'm pretty sure the Shawfield site is earmarked for redevelopment though.
Precident for Livingston, hibs and hearts to move games v us and them to Murrayfield to boost the gates if allowed.It would be crazy if they didn’t get an agreement to rent Hampden for at least the games against Rangers and them; they would make a fortune.
How can Motherwell and Kilmarnock expect to make money against us when they deliberately leave thousands of seats empty?What’s to stop Kilmarnock or Motherwell etc deciding they then want to rent Hampden for games against us to make a bit more money?
Their average attendance is second lowest in championship at 960.The romance of Queens Park back in the top flight is certainly one I’m attracted to, but less so if they’re playing their games in someplace like Stenhousemuir or Cumbernauld.
If they can afford to rent Hampden I hope they do so.
They can’t be allowed to use Hampden unless they are renting it and using it for every game. If they did it just for us and them it would be in unfair financial advantage on the other teamsIt would be crazy if they didn’t get an agreement to rent Hampden for at least the games against Rangers and them; they would make a fortune.
I haven’t been following this at all but it does seem bizarre they play at Hampden for years against the shite in League 2, then when they make a push to get up through the leagues they won’t see that benefit when in the top league.Lesser Hampden is like a juniors ground. Why did they sell Hampden? Surely the £5m sale price can't have been more than a couple years of rent from the SFA. Even stranger they sold it after finally turning pro.
I haven’t been following this at all but it does seem bizarre they play at Hampden for years against the shite in League 2, then when they make a push to get up through the leagues they won’t see that benefit when in the top league.
Not only us and celtic, but a few other teams fans would take a good following for a trip there you’d imagine.
That £5m is probably funding the push right enough
Wonder where they threatened to move to? Think we all know the answer, queens park should have made the sfa blink first.I think the SFA pretty much made them sell, their contract for use of the ground was up and the basically said unless they sold they would take games annd move all their offices elsewhere. The only think keeping QP afloat was the income from the SFA. They had no option.
Spoke to a couple of guys involved in cricket yesterday. They had heard that it was St. cadoc’s rather than Queen’s Park. Poloc cricket club are hoping to fight it.Heard they are buying the cricket ground in Pollok park and turning it into a training facility. Some big hoo-ha over the cricket club lossing their home after 140odd years and it was supposedly Queens Park who are taking it up.
This is exactly what will happen. The Scotland Under age teams will play at Lesser Hampden from next season onwards. The pitch has the highest specification of anything outwith Ibrox.I'd be stunned if Queens Park were not to be found playing their bigger games Hampden next season if they get promoted. Scotland using the new facilities at lesser Hampden as their base will be a sweetener. They will register the Hampden campus as their home and use safety regs for moving the bigger games over the road.
Spoke to a couple of guys involved in cricket yesterday. They had heard that it was St. cadoc’s rather than Queen’s Park. Poloc cricket club are hoping to fight it.
Yes. They have had to deny it as the feelings are pretty strong. I’ve heard Jackie McNamara, Simon Donnelly and other ex-mutant players are putting money in to St. cadoc’s as a Salford City style project to try to get their ‘senior’ team into the SPFL.I’m sure Queen’s Park denied being involved in that. They have a long term lease on the facilities at Lochinch
Yes. They have had to deny it as the feelings are pretty strong. I’ve heard Jackie McNamara, Simon Donnelly and other ex-mutant players are putting money in to St. cadoc’s as a Salford City style project to try to get their ‘senior’ team into the SPFL.