talkingsportsjacket
Well-Known Member
Papers at their finest.???
Fckn stupidity at its best.
How anyone can read they rhags is beyond me.
Fckn stupidity at its best.
How anyone can read they rhags is beyond me.
Or having a siege mentality ' with heart and and sword and shield !@!@Fortress could be swords and shields.
Wee bit medieval .
That would imply that they are a pair of bumbling idiots! That would be very objectionable!If they use the headline Home Guard, why not superimpose onto the characters from Dad's Army?
it appeals to their like minded audience underlining their journos and sports editor have a bias against us , which is missed on occasions from some bears.....Good news that the club are doing something about this kind of stuff but which idiot decided it was a good idea he should be bagged.
Not bothered at all by that, sounds like the club are just keep the media in check a little with the slightest issue so they won't overstep the mark worse. Would be quite something to find the club managing the media well.
That's the problem ,they have people in there who think that's fine and no doubt are still employed by them.Whoever thought that was funny or appropriate has the mind of child. Not massively offensive or anything just why?
You only see paramilitary in there if you really want to. They’ve been shopped on to a British cop.I don’t have any issues with it myself, but the visual signifier it kinda transcends is that of a parliamentary group, law & order etc. Its not something the sub-editor should be passing as an OK to go image tbh. But it’s The Sun, and their pond looks life, so that explains that.
I HATE the Sun scab paper but Dads army would have been better if trying to show our squad and gaffer up as Dads army were hopeless but i think this however much Tav & Stevie understandably might not like it, makes it look like our team is a hell of a strong force now. I have no issue with it other than it might not be what Tav or SG want portrayed like. In my opinion, being all offended over this is acting like that mhob from other side of city.If the Sun wanted to inject some attempt at humour why not use Dads Army characters instead ?
Maybe the editor isn’t that smart or switched on and just went for the automatic weapon look with body armour and forget if it’s distasteful images
Sums up the Sun
If they photoshopped their heads on Dad's Army characters people would say they were taking the piss. And they'd be right.If the Sun wanted to inject some attempt at humour why not use Dads Army characters instead ?
Maybe the editor isn’t that smart or switched on and just went for the automatic weapon look with body armour and forget if it’s distasteful images
Sums up the Sun
Am I offended? Am I fuuk.
Do I think it’s a childish mocked up photo? Yes.
Would I ever buy the Sun? No.
Well you must be a dickGenuinely don't have an issue with that.
Rather than the usual digs aimed at us, they’ve tried to be more clever this time. Seems it’s backfired, so it will be back to the usual Masonic conspiracies etc etc for the ragtops.it appeals to their like minded audience underlining their journos and sports editor have a bias against us , which is missed on occasions from some bears.....
why have they apologised then....?See no issues with that at all.
Alot of sensitive souls out there
A tad daft considering the sensitive nature of people now a day's. But i would definitely buy these as operators on COD hahaThe offending article.
I just assumed (and hoped) that they were moonlighting the night that the filth lost to Ross CountyDon't see why people are offended by the picture. I don't think portraying football people with firearms is a good idea and the club would be justified in nipping it in the bud by complaining but offended no way.