I think Goldson is a decent defender, I know a lot of posters on here rate him highly, so why is it only clubs like wba and NF are being linked?
I don’t think so why would Rangers wait until then on a player I think k if he’s unwilling to resign by now then he will have to get the best deal he can get elsewhere .This is only a positive for us - if/when we win the league and if no Prem clubs come in for him, I believe he'll resign for us.
He’s not leaving Rangers for a English Championship Club surly, I’d be amazed no EPL team is after him.NOTTINGHAM FOREST and West Brom are vying for the pre-contract signature of Rangers defender Connor Goldson. The 29-year-old Ibrox defender looks certain to quit Gers when his deal ends in the summ…www.thescottishsun.co.uk
I don't think he wants to go I think he just wants to be valued for the service he's given the club as he's barely missed a game in his time here. He's also a huge leader on and off the park as well so for me we should be bursting the bank to keep him he'll be a massive loss.Imagine leaving us to play for 1 of them.
No European football.
No 50000 home fans every 2nd week.
No competing for trophies.
Playing championship football at the peak of your career when you could play for one of the biggest names in the UK and a big name in Europe.
No no surely not we should not be ‘busting the bank’ for any player you know that mate .I don't think he wants to go I think he just wants to be valued for the service he's given the club as he's barely missed a game in his time here. He's also a huge leader on and off the park as well so for me we should be bursting the bank to keep him he'll be a massive loss.
If we can get shot of Lundstram and his alleged wage then for me that wage would be given in a new deal to Goldson. I doubt it's accurate but if that sun report is and Souttar is seen as his replacement then its a massive downgrade in quality.No no surely not we should not be ‘busting the bank’ for any player you know that mate .
We know what the market values contracts and skills at and what our market is and what we can afford and that is what our model will reflect
Surely this is the week links start to appear?
We are in the market for a RW and if reports are correct and Olsen is away to Brugge then surely leaks will start this week.
Has there been more on the move to Brugge seemed to have went quiet these last few days
He has already said (to an admin on here) that he doesn’t want to leave Rangers. Stumbling block is wages.That story about Goldson is good news for us IMO.
Nottingham Forest or West Brom in the Championship or Rangers with the Champions League next season? I think the odds are in our favour in those circumstances tbh.
IMO he doesn't want to leave us but probably genuinely feels he can't stay if he's being undervalued.He has already said (to an admin on here) that he doesn’t want to leave Rangers. Stumbling block is wages.
I think he’s being clever in the fact that come the summer he simply says ‘it would cost £5m+ to replace me, just pay me that figure over the next 3-4 years and you will save my wages’
Seriously? A standout for us in Europe. Plays 50+ games every season without getting injured. Integral member of the invincible team last season.
Our current squad is bloated and not good enough precisely due to average footballers, overpaid or otherwise.Agree. If we can’t get 2 first team starters this month then we shouldn’t bother doing anything, squad fillers should be coming from the youth setup, not overpaid average footballers from down south
I think this whole bloated issue will largely resolve next season.Our current squad is bloated and not good enough precisely due to average footballers, overpaid or otherwise.
Rangers have conducted a very positive window with the few deals done so I’d be happy as is.
There are clearly a number of players who should be long gone but realistically due to their wages they won’t be and will likely hang about unless we pay them off.
I'd have to agree, I would like to have seen a couple of players in giving them time to bed in before the Celtic game. I would also like both to be players who would strengthen our first 11. Its been too many windows now just buying squad fillers.One week left and no significant replacements other than Sands is beginning to be a worry, I’d have expected a RB and RW by this time, let’s hope the club are busy behind the scenes.
Sands will never be a replacement for either Davis or Goldson.I think this whole bloated issue will largely resolve next season.
The likes of barker and firth are OOC and wont need replacing, then you have big earners like balogun, goldson, davis and arfield all out of contract, with some arguably already replaced with the signings of sands and souttar.
In terms of CDM, i certainly think Gio will see Sands as Davis successor. Whether he has the same impact is to be seen. As for Goldson, i think a replacement for him will be in the summer. Souttar for me is the Balogun replacementSands will never be a replacement for either Davis or Goldson.
I'm not writing him off after one game even if it sounds that way but from what I've seen and the contributions of Goldson and Davis then no, no way.
We're in big trouble then, mate. I don't think Gio is that nieve - I think he sees Sand as a utility man and a low-risk outlay that can cover a couple of important positions in the squad.In terms of CDM, i certainly think Gio will see Sands as Davis successor. Whether he has the same impact is to be seen. As for Goldson, i think a replacement for him will be in the summer. Souttar for me is the Balogun replacement
Said it on the other thread, but Championship clubs paying decent but not outlandish wages.
It is a fact that Barrie McKay was on £18k per week at Nottingham Forest
Not sure how it was structured, but that was the figure touted, ‘almost’ from the horses mouth.