I Remember the feeling when we were chasing 55 and they would get last minute goas etc to take all 3 points and its soul destroyingSitting there with 5 minutes to go, trousers roon their ankles, getting towards the vinegar strokes, then... boom. Penalty Sevco, whole night wasted. Can't have been easy. Let's hope tonight piles on the agony for them.
But the wee diving Japanese gets a round of applause for getting his hair ruffled to win a penalty.I used to get annoyed at their Bitching now! Let’s have a laugh. The comment regards Kent’s penalty last night was,” Kent Drew the Penalty from Porteous” I must admit I thoroughly enjoy their Hurt, may it long continue
He could've responded yes or no and still be hit with laughing emojisA boy in our 7 a side chat (tim) said "I see you got your typical penalty last night when yous were struggling?"
Someone replied asking if he thought it was a penalty.
"Aye".
So we're now at the stage where even if they admit it's a penalty, there's some sort of conspiracy!
I thought Kent dived, but then every penalty we get is controversial despite this being our softest award since the 1980’s.
We were talking about that on the group chat. Tims replying to each other on John Hartsons tweet telling others it was a penalty to be met with an answer of 'It disnae matter.'A boy in our 7 a side chat (tim) said "I see you got your typical penalty last night when yous were struggling?"
Someone replied asking if he thought it was a penalty.
"Aye".
So we're now at the stage where even if they admit it's a penalty, there's some sort of conspiracy!
Last night on the way home from the game I heard Tom English, Neil Alexander and possibly Billy Dodds? stating they felt it was a clear penalty
Collins said it was soft and was ridiculed a bit for it tbh
Think the majority of them are most likely to be on "websites" that are ileagal TBH.Thankfully I don’t know any personally that I have to speak to regarding football
By Rangers hating bubble you mean the entirety of Scottish Football.I actually don't mind them seething about the obvious ones like this. It makes them look ridiculous to anyone outside of their daft, Rangers hating bubble, and let's us cover up the more orchestrated ones a bit better
....or completely and utterly bigoted.It was the "it was soft" nonsense that gets me. If we had had VAR last night it would have been given. It was a stonewall penalty as Porteous clearly brought down Kent inside the box. Anybody who attempts to argue the contrary is just being silly.
It’s not difficult is it. It’s like a matador waving a red cape at a snorting bull. Porteous is a liability. Hibs is his level.Kent did draw the challenge from Porteous, it was superb from Kent.
Was back shift last night so i had to listen to BBC Shortbread and the 3 pundits said it was a penalty right away and they were confused as why it had taken Beaton so long to point to the spot.
They even asked the boy who sits on the touchline for BBC Scotland Brian ? his view on the decision he also said it was a penalty.
ffsI thought Kent dived, but then every penalty we get is controversial despite this being our softest award since the 1980’s.
Any top forward player draws the penalty it doesn't make it less of a penalty.I used to get annoyed at their Bitching now! Let’s have a laugh. The comment regards Kent’s penalty last night was,” Kent Drew the Penalty from Porteous” I must admit I thoroughly enjoy their Hurt, may it long continue
I heard Strachan talking years ago how having a go at refs during a gane won't change the decision but it will influence the next one. This is straight out of his playback on how to influence refs.We need to get this straight. Everyone making an issue of this penalty is not hurting. They are simply promoting the clear agenda to referees that every penalty given to Rangers will be analysed and scrutinised for days after the game.
Message to referees - if you want a quiet life do not give Rangers any decisions.
Heard Collins saying Rangers are bang average? Well square forehead it’s bang 7 points clear you f.ucking tadger.
This sums it up perfectly.Any penalty we get is considered controversial. It’s beyond boring.
Last nights penalty was a cast iron stone wall penalty.
Koyogo tried to draw a penalty by throwing his head against an opponent's stomach, but he failedKent did draw the challenge from Porteous, it was superb from Kent.
If Contact with the ball = No and Contact with the attacker = Yes And Location = Inside the penalty box Then Penalty = Yes. There is no IF or Else statement that says this is not a penalty, did he draw it? Maybe, did he dive? No, was the defender daft enough to have a foul inside the box drawn from him by fancy footwork and skill? Yes (as he dived right in because it is in his nature to try and hack our players).Location: Inside the penalty box
Contact with the ball: No
Contact with attacker: Yes
Colour of attackers top: Blue
Penalty: No
(C) SFA
Seems to be part of CFC their last Japanese was prone to the belly flap or twenty, Cheetin rats!At the same time this craziness is being pushed by bigots we pay for there is hardly a comment made about Kyogo who is the biggest cheat I have seen in Scottish football. Cheatin’, greetin’ and molestin’ since 1888
Of course Kent knew what he was doing i.e. he was trying to get in a position to shoot! He was not trying to con porteous into fouling him. Kent was just too nimble on his feet and the tackle was mistimed.To be fair, Kent knew exactly what he was doing and Porteous bought it, deep down the big idiot will know he was daft and it was a nailed on certain penalty.
It's either a penalty or it isn,t .this soft penalty is nothing more than a media invention.Just watched it on repeat via Sportscenes "It was soft, but it was a penalty" analysis on the BBC website.
He knows instantly it's a penalty - his initial reaction is to say "I got the ball" when he never gets anywhere near it as it's Kent who prods the ball past him.
That's exactly what it is they even attacked certain refs at their AGM still have not heard if there is any punishment for that.We need to get this straight. Everyone making an issue of this penalty is not hurting. They are simply promoting the clear agenda to referees that every penalty given to Rangers will be analysed and scrutinised for days after the game.
Message to referees - if you want a quiet life do not give Rangers any decisions.
think you're missing the sarcasm in the original postKoyogo tried to draw a penalty by throwing his head against an opponent's stomach, but he failed
If Contact with the ball = No and Contact with the attacker = Yes And Location = Inside the penalty box Then Penalty = Yes. There is no IF or Else statement that says this is not a penalty, did he draw it? Maybe, did he dive? No, was the defender daft enough to have a foul inside the box drawn from him by fancy footwork and skill? Yes (as he dived right in because it is in his nature to try and hack our players).
He’s a *** it’s to be expected fcuk him.Some of Collins comments last night were straight from a Celtic poscast unreal.
If that's Jota or Kyogo instead of Kent,they'd be screaming for a penalty. What makes it worse for them is that it was Beaton who gave it to add insult to injury. Can you imagine the conspiracy theories,lol.Aye, but don't tell them that. Wind the fucking idiots up to the max.