Ferrybear73
Well-Known Member
Fucking shambles.We get 8000 vs Brighton on the same day. Can someone explain the science?
Fucking shambles.We get 8000 vs Brighton on the same day. Can someone explain the science?
We can work around idiots, this lot are much more sinister and vindictive.Yes.
The SNP are complete idiots.
No, this is dependent on capacity. Thats why they have more than us.Rangers should issue 6000 more tickets for Real Madrid on Sunday to allow 18500 in to Ibrox and take the council to court if they try stopping us.
If 18500 is now a safe number in Glasgow then it counts everywhere.
The percentage should be the same, it isn'tNo, this is dependent on capacity. Thats why they have more than us.
Just read they are also getting 24,500 for there first home lge game
Don't talk garbage please.No, this is dependent on capacity. Thats why they have more than us.
It's not science it's poperyWe get 8000 vs Brighton on the same day. Can someone explain the science?
Since when? It's never depended on capacity of stadiums north or south of the border.No, this is dependent on capacity. Thats why they have more than us.
10000 X £25 = £250k.This is something the club should be taking the administration to task over. First thing would be lodging a claim for the lost gate receipts amount.
No one actually knows what it is dependent on and that’s the problem.No, this is dependent on capacity. Thats why they have more than us.
No it shouldn't.The percentage should be the same, it isn't
Who told you that?No, this is dependent on capacity. Thats why they have more than us.
Two thingsStewart Robertson pulling down his trousers, turning round and assuming the position as we speak
There are almost no judges in Scotland who would rule in our favour on any subject.Rangers should be taking GCC to court for loss of earnings and restriction of trade
There is no rationale how they are calculating these numbers
A judge would 100% say it’s unfair practice
Sick of GCC and their victimisation of our club
If that was the case, based on our capacity of 50.8k against their 60.4k, their 18,500 attendance would be comparable to 15,560 at Ibrox - almost twice the actual allowance on the same day (8,000).No, this is dependent on capacity. Thats why they have more than us.
1. He's in a position that will attract critiscmTwo things
1 That is incredibly disrespectful to the MD of Rangers and
2 You could not be further from the truth about the guy
Whats the equation then?No, this is dependent on capacity. Thats why they have more than us.
From their statementWhere is that confirmed?
Was on bbc sport appWhere is that confirmed?
Your not wrong.I said this last week on a thread.Won’t up our allocation until others have had theirs up’d first.Let’s be honest was always going to happen!
Well if it is dependent on capacity why was there a blanket 2k for all stadiums last week, and why they are allowed a greater % of capacity if that is the very thing it is dependent upon?No, this is dependent on capacity. Thats why they have more than us.
No the correct answer is the SNP are being polite nothing but Republican scum.Yes.
The SNP are complete idiots.
God dammit. There are certainly some ejits around.There will be people reading this very thread who vote for them as well. Madness.
Hahaha ffs mate we were building bridges and doing dignified silences until recently.The club better be questioning these fu*king rhats to why they are being allowed more and who made this decision.Enough is enough they are getting a helping hand any way they can.At least the club have come flying out the blocks in regards to this.
Always too slow.
They’re utterly useless.There have been plenty of threads on here about Club 1872.
Lets see you do something to protect our club.
The silence from this organisation gets my back up.
Funny that anyone suggesting it was being labelled as a conspiracist nut job.Let’s be honest was always going to happen!
We say it time and time again on here, but clearly we have supporters who do vote for the charlatans at the snp! They should hang their heads in shame!It is true though.
How can any Rangers fan vote for these charlatans.
So tell me what you know he does in the background?1. He's in a position that will attract critiscm
2. His actions or lack of do not indicate that
Maybe they will report GCC to PSThere have been plenty of threads on here about Club 1872.
Lets see you do something to protect our club.
The silence from this organisation gets my back up.
If doing a % Rangers should be allowed 16000 for game against Brighton.
Scum are getting 30% v WHU we are on 15%. That needs challenged
From the attacks on fans and the club by all and sundry especially GCC imo he doesnt do enough to fight back.So tell me what you know he does in the background?
I have known Stewart quite a while and believe me he is no shrinking violet, not mouthy but gets his point across
I will agree with you on Club1872 lolFrom the attacks on fans and the club by all and sundry especially GCC imo he doesnt do enough to fight back.
If he is no shrinking violet he certainly does well to hide that side of himself.
Let's see what if any comment / action is made regards the disparity in attendances.
You have the opinion that Club 1872 arent representing its members as they should. I have the opinion that Stewart Robertson doesnt do enough to represent Rangers fans. Both are opinions that we are entitled to. (Btw I agree with you regards C1872)
It's just worth repeating this post.We either do something about it as a club or just continue to get shat on by the bigots in charge.
It’s a pretty simple choice
So how has this happened and what has Mr Robertson done about this?He has allowed a discrepancy in numbers to happen.He appears a very weak individual to be honest.Two things
1 That is incredibly disrespectful to the MD of Rangers and
2 You could not be further from the truth about the guy
Where is either the explanation or the response to this nonsense today then ?Two things
1 That is incredibly disrespectful to the MD of Rangers and
2 You could not be further from the truth about the guy
And under Level 2 rules the maximum capacity should have been 500, with a maximum at Level 0 of 2000That’s not part of the legal framework though and remember the Arsenal game was under level 2 rules, not the level 0 ones now in operation. It’s not a direct comparison.
Whether it was their 30.6% for West Ham, or our 25% - if the percentage of capacity had been the same there would be no argument. Really we want to see us getting higher numbers quicker, so really we should have been looking for 15500 at Real Madrid, than wanting their numbers brought down. Especially considering the lack of financial benefit for themThis - or something similar.
They started with 2000 for their first game as a 'tester'. We did likewise. They then ramped up to circa 9000 for their second game. We follow that with a similar number v Brighton. We then jump ahead with the Real game, where we get an increase to circa 12,000. I'd argue the Dhims should, therefore, be getting circa 12,000 v West Ham. We then get circa 17,000 v Livi and they should be getting roughly that for their first home league match as well, not the over 24,000 quoted.
I'm not sure if they have a financial benefit from the increased crowd v West Ham. Do they not include friendlies in their ST? Similarly, when we get to league games with restricted attendances they will all be paid up season ticket holders so no real financial gain there either.