The lack of real information is madness yet because you say fact that makes it so?The lack of real information in this thread is madness. Rangers are front and centre of these negotiations and that's a fact.
Not because I say fact because I know we're at the forefront of these negotiations.The lack of real information is madness yet because you say fact that makes it so?
The irony
Not because I say fact because I know we're at the forefront of these negotiations.
We've been in negotiations for weeks now with the relevant authorities and there's been some bang on posts among the madness for crowd attendances.
That’s exactly it mate the rangers board are lying down and letting Susan Aitken and her cronies tickle our belly.How come Celtic keep getting a higher attendance? Is it a cunning plan on our part?
Not because I say fact because I know we're at the forefront of these negotiations.
We've been in negotiations for weeks now with the relevant authorities and there's been some bang on posts among the madness for crowd attendances.
It’s a business related decision that is designed to impact on the clubs finances. From that point of view alone the club must challenge this decision.
A previous quote from Mr Robertson- Rangers fans have stuck by our club in the darkest of times. Their loyalty will not be forgotten and they will not be left behind. Well I am of the opinion 10,000 are getting left behind on this oneTwo things
1 That is incredibly disrespectful to the MD of Rangers and
2 You could not be further from the truth about the guy
I don’t believe this for a second obviously, but I do genuinely want to know the justification for allowing them higher numbers?That’s exactly it mate the rangers board are lying down and letting Susan Aitken and her cronies tickle our belly.
It looks silly I agree but the abuse the Rangers Staff are taking here is out of order. They have been top drawer and by far the biggest leading light in getting fans back into stadiums.I don’t believe this for a second obviously, but I do genuinely want to know the justification for allowing them higher numbers?
If it was a % then I could understand that, but it’s not.
We clearly poor at negotiating then.Not because I say fact because I know we're at the forefront of these negotiations.
We've been in negotiations for weeks now with the relevant authorities and there's been some bang on posts among the madness for crowd attendances.
I agree, it doesn’t look great but as per my post above the Rangers Board getting dogs abuse over this is wrong. Stewart Robertson was bending over and taking it up the Celtic End according to some on this thread - complete and utter bullshitFrom the outside looking in, it would seem like we aren’t doing a great job of negotiating then when our biggest rivals continue to be allowed significantly larger crowds than us along with the financial advantage that goes with that.
Grow up mateWe clearly poor at negotiating then.
Numbers allowed into games would indicate otherwise. If Rangers have been top drawer and the leading light why are we worse off? I get you dont like staff getting criticised but c'mon the optics are terrible.It looks silly I agree but the abuse the Rangers Staff are taking here is out of order. They have been top drawer and by far the biggest leading light in getting fans back into stadiums.
Quality response. Do you honestly think Ra gers have done a good job here?Grow up mate
If the staff deserve the criticism give them it both barrels. I know I would.Numbers allowed into games would indicate otherwise. If Rangers have been top drawer and the leading light why are we worse off? I get you dont like staff getting criticised but c'mon the optics are terrible.
Do you honestly think Rangers are doing nothingA previous quote from Mr Robertson- Rangers fans have stuck by our club in the darkest of times. Their loyalty will not be forgotten and they will not be left behind. Well I am of the opinion 10,000 are getting left behind on this one
Imo they do deserve the criticism. Scum are getting 30% capacity in v WHU we are gettig 15% v BHA. Even taking into account increase of % per game against Real we should be 17000 not 12500.If the staff deserve the criticism give them it both barrels. I know I would.
When there’s no communication on this issue (and on the friendly tickets fiasco)… then it does appear so.Do you honestly think Rangers are doing nothing
Not enough would be a fairer term than nothing.Do you honestly think Rangers are doing nothing
Feel free to tell me why staff deserve the hassle,Imo they do deserve the criticism. Scum are getting 30% capacity in v WHU we are gettig 15% v BHA. Even taking into account increase of % per game against Real we should be 17000 not 12500.
So feel free to explain how Rangers have led the way on this. The word fact doesnt count btw. Lets have some meat on the bones of your arguement.
Imo they do deserve the criticism. Scum are getting 30% capacity in v WHU we are gettig 15% v BHA. Even taking into account increase of % per game against Real we should be 17000 not 12500.
So feel free to explain how Rangers have led the way on this. The word fact doesnt count btw. Lets have some meat on the bones of your arguement.
Who is negotiating on our behalf? Is it a consultancy company or Rangers staff? If they are not doing a good job then they should be open to criticismFeel free to tell me why staff deserve the hassle,
I have no idea if they are in fact doing nothing but knowing Stewart, I would doubt it very much, If the SNP can tell you to put your volume on the pub tv to mute as they are following the Science I think anything can happenNot enough would be a fairer term than nothing.
Another poster says Rangers are leading the way however the evidence as per capacity etc does not back that up. I think its fair that fans that pump money into the club are entitled to ask questions aboit the performance of the board.
I have no idea, that's why I'm not criticising them.Who is negotiating on our behalf? Is it a consultancy company or Rangers staff? If they are not doing a good job then they should be open to criticism
I hope they do, the fans should be told how GCC came to this decisionThe board should shed some light on this issue, so we know the facts.
I realise they do t make the final decision. However to suggest they are at the forefront and leading lights and then we get treated differently with no actual science or rational behind those decisions surely leads to questions being asked?Rangers don't make the final decision. That's the only fact. But the idea the Club are simply shrugging their shoulders and doing little is nonsense. They'll be as exasperated as the support.
It's the typical scatter-gun approach, though.
Id imagine it would be SR however I would fully support you negotiating on our behalfI have no idea, that's why I'm not criticising them.
If they ask me I'll give it a go
I agree, it doesn’t look great but as per my post above the Rangers Board getting dogs abuse over this is wrong. Stewart Robertson was bending over and taking it up the Celtic End according to some on this thread - complete and utter bullshit
No arguement from me on the snp. I cant really voice my opinion on that or ill get a banI have no idea if they are in fact doing nothing but knowing Stewart, I would doubt it very much, If the SNP can tell you to put your volume on the pub tv to mute as they are following the Science I think anything can happen
Turn it around and some people are blaming the Board? Staff when they have no knowledge of what is actually happeningI realise they do t make the final decision. However to suggest they are at the forefront and leading lights and then we get treated differently with no actual science or rational behind those decisions surely leads to questions being asked?
If folk are happy to say the board are doing their best yet the results indicate differently then thats fine. However history has taught me not to blindly follow.
You should get a Knighthood, not a ban lolNo arguement from me on the snp. I cant really voice my opinion on that or ill get a ban
I sincerely hope that they have asked and that they will get a replyTurn it around and some people are blaming the Board? Staff when they have no knowledge of what is actually happening
Let's wait and see if The club has asked for an explanation and if they got a reply
And share it with the SupportI sincerely hope that they have asked and that they will get a reply
I realise they do t make the final decision. However to suggest they are at the forefront and leading lights and then we get treated differently with no actual science or rational behind those decisions surely leads to questions being asked?
If folk are happy to say the board are doing their best yet the results indicate differently then thats fine. However history has taught me not to blindly follow.
The Scum need money and GCC will bend over backwards for them and not us. That’s the science.We get 8000 vs Brighton on the same day. Can someone explain the science?
Id like to see the arguement in disparity of % that both clubs are allowedIt may not matter what argument we put forward. If the other party is intransigent and even antagonistic to us, they can counter each argument. There's little we can do. Your ire should be directed at the decision-makers.
Hopefully the discussions now are revolving around Livingston now that the yahoo crowd has been bumped up.
We've already highlighted we're expecting a full crowd for the Euro tie.
Seemingly the West Ham game is included on their ST (for those successful in the ballot) so there’s no monetary angle in it for them.The Scum need money and GCC will bend over backwards for them and not us. That’s the science.
IMO we should have more as our stands are stand-aloneId like to see the arguement in disparity of % that both clubs are allowed
Plus not the bottle necks like parkheadIMO we should have more as our stands are stand-alone
Well perhaps I am wrong about it still isn’t any less absurd and stinking of corruption though, think I saw something about the SFA being at the match for ‘safety training’ then after it they were given the VIP treatment, then this announcement is made. In any event just gives us a strong argument going forward for more fans coming in.Seemingly the West Ham game is included on their ST (for those successful in the ballot) so there’s no monetary angle in it for them.
Send big Andy Smillie in . . . might see a wee difference.Id imagine it would be SR however I would fully support you negotiating on our behalf
Then the two us would end up in Govan nickSend big Andy Smillie in . . . might see a wee difference.
LolThen the two us would end up in Govan nick
Susan Aitkens an elephant.