Zapp Brannigan
Well-Known Member
For a game we "bossed" motherwell had
- More possession
- more corners
- same amout of shots on goal
- same amount of shots on target
- oh ... and scored two goals!!
I didn't say we bossed the game, mate.
For a game we "bossed" motherwell had
- More possession
- more corners
- same amout of shots on goal
- same amount of shots on target
- oh ... and scored two goals!!
Sorry I don't want to take this thread in another direction, but to answer your question I consider big games to be against the filth, the sheep, Hivs, European games and late stages of cups. We have lost everyone I just mentioned. Suggesting that if we got beat against St Johnstone it would be considered a big game does nothing to help that argument.Depends what you consider a 'big game'. If we'd failed to beat St Johnstone then plenty would have called that a big game he failed to win. As it was, we won and it's ignored. Same with the QF against Thistle - it was a big game until we won it (albeit in ET).
And in what way are they better?I haven't for a second said things are rosy. I've said things are better.
Sorry I don't want to take this thread in another direction, but to answer your question I consider big games to be against the filth, the sheep, Hivs, European games and late stages of cups. We have lost everyone I just mentioned. Suggesting that if we got beat against St Johnstone it would be considered a big game does nothing to help that argument.
Your main point seemed to be about making progress and of that I am not disputing. But you cannot dispute my "big games" point which is plain to see.
I'm guessing nobody bothered to watch yesterday back before replying. Your minds are made up, I get that. But you're doing yourself a disservice if you are claiming this team is no better than last year's. It's patently obvious to anyone watching that we are better. Not good enough yet, but better.
Sorry I don't want to take this thread in another direction, but to answer your question I consider big games to be against the filth, the sheep, Hivs, European games and late stages of cups. We have lost everyone I just mentioned. Suggesting that if we got beat against St Johnstone it would be considered a big game does nothing to help that argument.
Your main point seemed to be about making progress and of that I am not disputing. But you cannot dispute my "big games" point which is plain to see.
Progress in comparison to where we were when Pedro took over, but nowhere near where we should be at this stage.
And in what way are they better?
I watched Warburton's team and saw no signs of life, so I gave up on him even before last season started. I saw similar in McCoist and PLG - no chink of light at all. But this is different. Yes it may be two steps forward, one back, but there are steps forward. Let's do ourselves a favour and be honest about that.
I'm guessing nobody bothered to watch yesterday back before replying. Your minds are made up, I get that. But you're doing yourself a disservice if you are claiming this team is no better than last year's. It's patently obvious to anyone watching that we are better. Not good enough yet, but better.
There were more signs of life in PLG's team - Europe, for example. And if Sebo sticks away last minute chance, we beat Celtic 2-1.
There's no tangible progress from Pedro. What signs vs. Celtic did you see? That was Pedro's 3rd game against them.
Progress has been minimal considering the amount that has been spent in the summer.
Might be wrong here but being slightly less shite than this time last year was probably not the overall objective.
The OP wants us to re-watch the game to see how much we "bossed" the 1st half of a game we ended up losing?? Give me f*cking peace! We were horrendous and if there is an improvement on last season then it is only a slight improvement. We needed a big improvement and for the money given to him we should have got it.
This reminds me of a few years ago whilst working down in Portsmouth.My mate and I went to a game against Man U and got talking to the local fans.They were telling us about their centre forward and one remark was "He's certainly improved since last season when he was shite-this season he is only crap"I'm guessing nobody bothered to watch yesterday back before replying. Your minds are made up, I get that. But you're doing yourself a disservice if you are claiming this team is no better than last year's. It's patently obvious to anyone watching that we are better. Not good enough yet, but better.
Honestly, we were a match for them for most of the first half and between their first and second. Not enough I agree, but I'm not saying we are there yet, only that we are better than we were and that we should acknowledge that.
I reckon the overall objective was to tighten the gap and show progress. At this point, we have no idea if the first will happen, but the second has begun.
People keep forgetting the gap off the pitch has never been bigger.
One Celtic player cost nearly as much as our first 11 FFS. Not to mention wages.
We cannot compare any Rangers managers tenure in the Premier League to PC's. It is not the same.
Half of FF cannot accept Pedro or any new Rangers manager WILL lose games. It's not 1998 anymore and never will be.
I agree that there has been progress and we should have been out of sight by half time.
However we weren't and once Motherwell went ahead we never looked like winning.
I've supported Pedro and still do at the moment, but if we slip any further behind Aberdeen and the mentally challengeds by the beginning of December I'm afraid I don't see any way back for him.
He has a relatively easy run of games coming up.
He must make the most of it.
Hibs isn't a big game but St. Johnstone and Partick Thistle are? Aye OK. Mental gymnastics. None of which puts us back in the Europe Cup, League Cup or changes the fact we are trailing Aberdeen.
It's all relative though. We are possibly slightly better. To be only slightly better after having the budget handed to him in the summer us absolutely criminal though.I'm guessing nobody bothered to watch yesterday back before replying. Your minds are made up, I get that. But you're doing yourself a disservice if you are claiming this team is no better than last year's. It's patently obvious to anyone watching that we are better. Not good enough yet, but better.
Why is Hibs a bigger game than St Johnstone? Thistle was a cup game, not the opposition that made it big.
some on here have us top of the If's &'s & but's league
unlucky, ref's , injuries, more time, more money
havnt read all replies but FFS
Yes this team can play a bit, but its normally in 15 min spells followed by 10 mins of dross.
Until you get 90 mins or close to it from the team our inconsistent results will continue
While I agree we have generally improved we certainly didn't boss the game yesterday. Not from where I was standing.
Despite having a stinking first half we went in at the break and, again, came out worse. I think everyone could see what was happening and why we tried to play motherwell at hoofball was baffling.
Watch the highlights of the first half. We completed bossed it and should have had two or three. Watch the St Johnstone game - completely bossed it.
The second half was sickening yesterday but we should have been out of sight. By all means have a go for results and failure to win 3 games in a row. But don't just make stuff up to make it all seem worse.
I watched Warburton's team and saw no signs of life, so I gave up on him even before last season started. I saw similar in McCoist and PLG - no chink of light at all. But this is different. Yes it may be two steps forward, one back, but there are steps forward. Let's do ourselves a favour and be honest about that.
People need to get real and realise that we have no divine right to win football matches,no one likes to see Rangers lose but we are on a journeyYip let’s say progress is dominating a match not scoring and getting beat 2-0. Please come to f*ck this is The Glasgow Rangers we are talking about, winning is everything and losing is worse than anything in this world, if your happy and content with what your watching, us dominating and then losing I don’t think we are the club for you.
We need to regain our rightful place at the top of Scottish football and I’m sorry to burst people’s bubble but a team managed by Pedro ain’t going to do that
Football matches aren’t won on how much u spend,we are still left with the debris of the breadmans reignThere has been progress but not the level you'd expect given the money spent.
That is where a lot of these arguments collapse I'm afraid; the sheer poverty of opponent we're facing.
We lost to Motherwell, a team made up of free transfers from the Vanarama Conference and other footballing back waters.
"Just shows how much further we have to go" is just not an acceptable excuse for that.
I think you'll find they invariably are, especially when the trophies are being handed out.Football matches aren’t won on how much u spend,we are still left with the debris of the breadmans reign
We had the better of the first half. I wouldn't say we bossed it.
I don’t for one minute think that we have a divine right to win but surely we should be expecting more than not winning a big game any time in the last 8 months a number people seem happy to accept mediocrity and put it down to being on a journey the point I am trying to make is we need to start showing that we are Rangers and putting fear into teams again not rolling over and getting our bellies tickled every time the going gets toughPeople need to get real and realise that we have no divine right to win football matches,no one likes to see Rangers lose but we are on a journey
Watch the highlights of the first half. We completed bossed it and should have had two or three. Watch the St Johnstone game - completely bossed it.
The second half was sickening yesterday but we should have been out of sight. By all means have a go for results and failure to win 3 games in a row. But don't just make stuff up to make it all seem worse.
I watched Warburton's team and saw no signs of life, so I gave up on him even before last season started. I saw similar in McCoist and PLG - no chink of light at all. But this is different. Yes it may be two steps forward, one back, but there are steps forward. Let's do ourselves a favour and be honest about that.