Ponientebear
Well-Known Member
At a not too difficult guess, McLennan and McCluskey.2 particularl people on that board (1 male 1 female) allegedly putting barriers up against everything we suggest.
At a not too difficult guess, McLennan and McCluskey.2 particularl people on that board (1 male 1 female) allegedly putting barriers up against everything we suggest.
Corrupt to the core.
How did it ever come this this, that a 20% minority community have 100% control of the SFA, SPFL, mhedia, courts, local government and Scottish Government
?
Agreed mate, I've removed itOut of order there
Every club who is due to host the filth twice next season before the split will be threatened with boycott by their hordes.
The difference is they will actually do it.
whichever way the filth want it.....
so not likely to be in our favour
They can't even keep up with their own demented fables. There's only one club doing the scurrying.
SPFL= Sucking Peter Fucking Lawell.SPFL = Supporting Peter F**king Lawell
I hope you haven’t offended him as he will skweem and skweem the house downApologies. I'd meant to reply to the post above yours, but clicked on yours by mistake!
Corrupt to the core.
How did it ever come this this, that a 20% minority community have 100% control of the SFA, SPFL, mhedia, courts, local government and Scottish Government
?
A good manipulator always gets someone else to do their bidding and there are more than enough willing candidates in this country for the job.Celtic are instrumental in everything that’s going on but you’re right that the actual physical dirty stuff is being done by proxy.
They can lie all they want. No one dares question themThey can't even keep up with their own demented fables. There's only one club doing the scurrying.
It all stands and falls on their lie. The scum don't need a title in order that money is distributed to member clubs. It's just not true.
They have had many years previously to this knowing Scottish football was being used for the sole advantage of one club, they, like most associated with football in this country fear for their jobs if they don’t comply.Unfortunately those that would are now furloughed
Not for issues that involve all clubsWhere did this 75percent rule come from.
I always thought (in the top league anyway) it was 11/1 required?
How the fvck can our our statement not be competent when we have a club rep on the SPFL board? Why are we seeking assistance with the drafting of our resolution? Do we not have lawyers who are aware of the SPFL rules?
Yes we are dealing with corrupt scummy cvnts but we do not appear to be too smart in our handling of this.
Don’t be naive these rats change or interpret the rules to suitHow the fvck can our our statement not be competent when we have a club rep on the SPFL board? Why are we seeking assistance with the drafting of our resolution? Do we not have lawyers who are aware of the SPFL rules?
Yes we are dealing with corrupt scummy cvnts but we do not appear to be too smart in our handling of this.
And by the way, David graham has done more for our PR in a positive manner than Jim Traynor had done in 8 years.
The man clearly knows the dark arts of the media better than we first thought. And that’s with working in Northern Ireland politics where it’s as murky and dark as you can get.
he’s not for being bullied that’s for sure.
Exactly as I mentioned that little cosy relationship must be readdressed, especially now they have so blatantly outed themselves, at a later date.Our biggest problem is we meekly accepted the bastards ruling that there was no conflict of interest in having a scum stooge Murdoch MacLennan on the SPFL board. We should have taken this further. He is on the payroll on the beasts owners ffs.
Not for issues that involve all clubs
Calling Rangers liarsThe response
The SPFL Board received a requisition from Rangers, supported by two other clubs, that the Board must issue a further resolution to members. This resolution sought to compel the SPFL to lend money to all 42 Clubs.
The Board took legal advice from a leading QC on the proposed resolution. By law, the members of a private company can require their Board to circulate a resolution, unless such resolution would be ineffective if passed.
The clear and unequivocal legal advice received by the SPFL is that the resolution received from Rangers is ineffective in terms of company law. As a result, the Board determined this morning that it cannot be circulated to members.
We have seen a statement from Rangers that they “sought comment from the SPFL Executive on several occasions yesterday, to ensure [their] resolution was deemed competent”. For the avoidance of doubt, only at 10.18pm yesterday did the SPFL’s lawyer receive an email from Rangers seeking advice on the content of their resolution, which was put before the SPFL Board first thing this morning.
Rangers have expressed a desire to submit a further resolution. The SPFL’s lawyers will work with Rangers, as they will with any other member club, who wishes to put forward a resolution. The offer to help clubs with the drafting of their resolutions was made during the divisional conference calls on Wednesday. Rangers chose to proceed without seeking that help, with the result that their resolution was ineffective.
A spokesman said: “These are extremely difficult times for the people of Scotland and for every club in the land.
“The SPFL Board has worked hard to propose a clear way of quickly delivering much-needed fee payments to the 30 clubs in the Ladbrokes Championship, League 1 and League 2.
“The alternative is further weeks, and possibly months, of uncertainty and financial hardship for dozens of clubs which are desperately looking for a way to survive.”
BBC Scotland reporting 'clubs arguing' but only mentioned Rangers. Aye Big Bad Rangers.
[/
sorry forgot having an opinion that didn’t include slagging the board or players was unwise.You never fail do you, it’s about time something was do and if most sensible people can see that they will be happy, so troll off somewhere else you crank.
They don't a flying fuck about the financial hardship clubs face.The response
The SPFL Board received a requisition from Rangers, supported by two other clubs, that the Board must issue a further resolution to members. This resolution sought to compel the SPFL to lend money to all 42 Clubs.
The Board took legal advice from a leading QC on the proposed resolution. By law, the members of a private company can require their Board to circulate a resolution, unless such resolution would be ineffective if passed.
The clear and unequivocal legal advice received by the SPFL is that the resolution received from Rangers is ineffective in terms of company law. As a result, the Board determined this morning that it cannot be circulated to members.
We have seen a statement from Rangers that they “sought comment from the SPFL Executive on several occasions yesterday, to ensure [their] resolution was deemed competent”. For the avoidance of doubt, only at 10.18pm yesterday did the SPFL’s lawyer receive an email from Rangers seeking advice on the content of their resolution, which was put before the SPFL Board first thing this morning.
Rangers have expressed a desire to submit a further resolution. The SPFL’s lawyers will work with Rangers, as they will with any other member club, who wishes to put forward a resolution. The offer to help clubs with the drafting of their resolutions was made during the divisional conference calls on Wednesday. Rangers chose to proceed without seeking that help, with the result that their resolution was ineffective.
A spokesman said: “These are extremely difficult times for the people of Scotland and for every club in the land.
“The SPFL Board has worked hard to propose a clear way of quickly delivering much-needed fee payments to the 30 clubs in the Ladbrokes Championship, League 1 and League 2.
“The alternative is further weeks, and possibly months, of uncertainty and financial hardship for dozens of clubs which are desperately looking for a way to survive.”
Calling Rangers liars
Anyone need any more convincing we need to do absolutely EVERYTHING POSSIBLE to get out of this league ?
If they are point blank refusing to put forward our resolution, and if we’re convinced we’re in the right then I think we may be heading for court.
We laugh at Colombia, Venezuela, Egypt, Irán, North Korea. Spain, Italy and Greece?This parochial shithole of Scotland absolutely disgusts me.
I wish we could GTF out of it.
We've never had a better opportunity since 2012, might as well roll the diceAt this rate I’d take simply not existing at all. It’s not worth it. I can’t stand being a Rangers fan under these circumstances. It’s blatant corruption on and off the pitch, and it’s constant. If we vanish, celtic will be stuck here alone, they will fade into nothing and everyone knows it. Let’s see how they manage then.
And by the way, David graham has done more for our PR in a positive manner than Jim Traynor had done in 8 years.
The man clearly knows the dark arts of the media better than we first thought. And that’s with working in Northern Ireland politics where it’s as murky and dark as you can get.
he’s not for being bullied that’s for sure.
If you have good lawyers you take them all the way to court.Don’t be naive these rats change or interpret the rules to suit