UnionCruiser72
Well-Known Member
Yeah probably but as you said, a far better option than Herrera.Would have been better than buying Herrera for a million.
He wouldn't get in the side we have now though.
Yeah probably but as you said, a far better option than Herrera.Would have been better than buying Herrera for a million.
He wouldn't get in the side we have now though.
Ironically the win directly lead to the defeat.I think history will show Pedro to be an absolute turkey...Warburton will hardly be remembered as anything other than a false dawn/failure.
But I think if you consider one gave us arguably the greatest single victory over Celtic and one delivered the worst result at home against them....you'll be getting closer to reality.
Holt came in on a two week trial, same as Halliday.
If he wasn't Warburton's signing then who's was he ?
I think history will show Pedro to be an absolute turkey...Warburton will hardly be remembered as anything other than a false dawn/failure.
But I think if you consider one gave us arguably the greatest single victory over Celtic and one delivered the worst result at home against them....you'll be getting closer to reality.
Yeah but even Pedro got a couple right... Morelos, Candias. Dorrans and Cordoso could yet come good.
Unfortunately like Warburton got the big ones wrong.
Warburton's first transfer window was a success.
The next three were unmitigated disasters. No other way to describe them.
I suspect he will have done very well out of a few bizarre transfers made over the years.McPartland has alot to answer for.
Stubbornness was and is his downfall.Good post,some decent signings,but no plan b
Everyone signs duds. The key for us is that duds should be the least expensive not the most expensive in the squad.I don't understand how you can say "unlike Pedro".
The team just now has many players both signed simply due to the fact we have only had 1 transfer window without them.
Candieas, John, Morelos every bit as impressive as Fod, Tav, Windass, Holt im recent weeks. With Ryan Jack and Graeme Dorrans also gonba be big players when not injured.
Both signed several duds too
I suspect he will have done very well out of a few bizarre transfers made over the years.
Everyone signs duds. The key for us is that duds should be the least expensive not the most expensive in the squad.
To believe your never wrong or need to adapt isn’t confidence it’s arrogance! It’s not an endearing trait..... you can however get away with it as long as your winning! That there was the problem.....simply he didn’t keep on getting results with his plan A and plan A better arrogance.....and may I add.... he never will in a top level league!The truth is, Warburton had some great attributes as a manager.
We sang his praises in that first season, and it was only right because he was doing a great job.
Sadly he also has some glaring flaws, and as someone who so often talked about learning curves and self-improvement regarding the players, he seemed to lack the self-awareness to change his own career for the better and to learn from his mistakes.
I still wish him well.
Brilliant first transfer window then an awful second summer one.
Got less to spend than Pedro mind but Garner, Senderos, Barton and Krancjar never worked out at all.
A few of his signings were decent value (tav fod windass etc) but a few were equally shocking. He's also the man that made it acceptable to be a loser at Rangers. Claiming that getting beat by Aberdeen was no big disaster because they had European pedegree. Like getting f**king pumped in the qualifiers makes you a European powerhouse. If that was the height of his continental ambition then we were well rid of him.
what ? We actually only drew with them over 90 minutes and then 120 minutes, and you not followed us for much if that is your thinking. In reality it is probably the worst thing that could have happened as they wouldn't have sacked Delia.
One took his team to Parkhead and lost 5-1 and the other left with that shambles of a squad that also lost 5-1, a four goal defeat we have suffered many times to them.
Ironically the win directly lead to the defeat.
Best I’ve read in a long time.No manager is ever all good or all bad.
Warburton put an enormous smile on our faces with 5 months or so of football that is up there with any Rangers side for sheer enjoyment to watch.
He made some key signings like Wes, Tav and potentially Windass or even Halliday.
He also gave us a wonderful victory against Celtic - their defeat to a Rangers side which was a division below them at the time will forever stick in their throat. Their highly talked up side was played off the park in patches that day.
Shortly after that he unfortunately disappeared up his own arse and took Davie Weir with him and in the end he was in some kind of Groundhog Day of learning but never actually demonstrating any change in behaviour, selection or approach. He gave us a Scottish Cup Final debacle as well.
Every manager and player is part of the fabric of this club - for better or worse.
I think things would be massively different if we hadn't won that semi final. We lost the final anyway, Celtc sacked their useless manager, got in a good one, backed him and so far have been beaten once domestically since then. We probably would've been closer to them in the league, there wouldn't have been as much pressure on the board to replace Warburton and we wouldn't have subsequently ended up with a complete diddy in Caixinha.Maybe it would be better sitting now not having that victory?
Beyond daft, if you want to put the whole thing in context Warburton showed he could beat Celtic and got very little investment. Pedro got murdered and as a result got big investment and still got murdered the next season......see if you can work out the difference.
Brilliant first transfer window then an awful second summer one.
Got less to spend than Pedro mind but Garner, Senderos, Barton and Krancjar never worked out at all.
Plus, he could manage the younger players, but had no idea to handle the experienced pros.What really got me was he totally changed his targets in the second season. From signing young talented footballers who seemed to have lost their way a bit he went and got a load of old, over the hill footballers who had made their money.
Granted he probably felt the first 11 needed some experienced heads but he way then way out of his comfort zone and bad luck then dictated that they were all, except Hill, bad and expensive decisions.
He contradicted himself, and it went against him.
He constantly said that he wouldn't bring in a player who would upset the dressing room by being on big wages , and not be in the mould of the character of a Rangers player.Then he signed Joey Barton, and we all know what happened there.
Not detracting from the OP which makes some good points. As others have also mentioned, there were other signings which were not so good.
I still shake my head regarding Sendros, and what he must have made out of us.
Yes, and it demonstrates how cutthroat the football business is.Good God, it pains me every time I'm reminded of Pedro, not so with Warburton, that's more of a disappointing ache.
Still smart at how he and Davie left us and tried to turn on us.
Arrogance is certainly a trait in the FS industry. Worked in it for about 14 years now and it’s full of arrogant dicks.Stubbornness was and is his downfall.
Is that a trait he learned in the FS industry?
He had great ideas, but even stevie wonder could see that we needed two things. A plan B and defensive organisation.
One of the saddest things for me was when I realised the 'warburton is magic' song disappeared. Sign that it was done.
He obviously didn't have the football intelligence to succeed.
The way he departed, really pissed me off at the time. And other than the publicity of it all, he did what I did when I left my last job. Realised it wasn't working and worked an exit that suited me.
The difference between first good summer transfer window and the bad SPL transfer window was about balls.
When Warburton got here.The club was on it's knees on the park.He was a coup for us to get him here from Brentford.That gave him the ability to do things his way.. to buy young hungry players to develop and change the style of football.
by the SPL window. He was struggling with the pressure in Glasgow,the cup final defeat and the demands of winning 55 in our first season..so he caved in and instead of buying the young players that suit his style. He bought in .. Barton (33) Hill(37) Niko(31) Gilks(34) Garner(28) Senderous(31). He didn't have the balls to go in that season to do it his way and go in with the youngsters/hidden gems.He accepted common wisdom of us only being able to win the league by having lots of older heads and "know how" to win every week and experience.That worked for Walter..but Warburton isn't Walter.That's not what Warburton was good at. There was less development in his 2nd season because there was far less to be developed.
Warburton's few younger signings that season.. Windass/Rossiter/Hyndman/toral/bates were actually better than the older ones.If he'd stuck with that the whole way through. He might of kept his job for a bit longer and we'd be in an even more promising position right now.
For every success story under Warburton (Tavernier, Foderingham, Windass-ish) there’s been a Kiernan, a Crooks and a Joey Barton (it looked like a disaster waiting to happen, and it was).
Some good, some not so good.
In short, a mixed bag and far from a vindication of his attributes as a manager.
Pedro could be due similar reappraisal in the not too distant future.
Peña, Herrera and Cardoso look like massive wastes of resources, but Morelos could net us a fortune, while Dorrans, John and Candeias all look like good additions, the latter especially so.
We’ll have a better perspective on Murty’s (and Allen’s) ability to spot a player by the end of the season, but it certainly feels like we’re doing smarter business now than at any time in the last 2 or 3 years.
Would have been better than buying Herrera for a million.
He wouldn't get in the side we have now though.
I think things would be massively different if we hadn't won that semi final. We lost the final anyway, Celtc sacked their useless manager, got in a good one, backed him and so far have been beaten once domestically since then. We probably would've been closer to them in the league, there wouldn't have been as much pressure on the board to replace Warburton and we wouldn't have subsequently ended up with a complete diddy in Caixinha.
I think that'll do for me on this thread. It's impossible to have a proper conversation with you because you're possibly the most condescending poster in The Bear Pit.
Yes, and it demonstrates how cutthroat the football business is.
Our loyalty as supporters is one where we can be criticised by those at club, ignored by those at the club and fleeced even mugged by those at the club, but we see the club as an entity that is bigger than mere persons working for it, and thus our loyalty and commitment is toward the club at an abstract level.
However, for men like Warburton, it is a job, a way of earning a living to keep and maintain his family, and that as a career, football clubs are just staging posts, even ones that you might even have affection for.
Clearly, Warburton probably saw that he never commanded full support from Dave King, the signs were there, and clearly, Warburton had decided to take the initiative.
Is that such a surprise?
That is usually what employees do in my experience when they feel that their position is flaky.
The point about the semi-final win over the Filth is an interesting one.
In hindsight, there is a strong case that had we lost, the useless Norwegian may have kept his job, and King (remember his comment about us being back) might have been panicked into releasing more money to Warburton.
But this assumes that the Filth Board were happy with Delia and that the semifinal on its own caused them to lose all confidence in him, which I doubt.
Further, that Warburton was starved of sufficient funds to make the next step up.
Rossiter, Barton and the pre-injury Kranjcar were all seen as excellent additions, and optimism was high that we had improved the squad sufficiently to bridge the gap by many on here.
In this, we underestimated just how bad Delia really was, and probably gave too much credence to Warburton and his squad which in a reality not helped by our usual bad luck, actually saw us well short of a better managed and better funded Celtc squad.
The problem has always been losing an entire international squad of players and having to bring the squad back up to that level whilst fighting our way up through some of the poorest leagues in Europe.
A hugely difficult task where mistakes were inevitably made against a backdrop of outside hostility and hate, whilst inside Ibrox a parcel of rogues were busy looting and despoiling the very fabric of the club.
I actually think today's Rangers is nothing short of a small miracle when all things are considered.
I hope we haven't lost those supporters GG.A huge miracle sir. I often stand in Ibrox and look round at the heaving stands and think to myself.... amazing.... simply amazing.
I still fear we have lost a generation of supporters but Rangers is clearly still is an amazing anchor that holds us all firm.
With regard to the semi victory.... have you heard the story about John Gilligan being over exuberantly celebrating infront of Dermot Diddly Dee? It was supposedly that moment where he decided he would push the boat out in his selection of a new manager. I'm not sure how accurate that story is.... it was probably over romanticised by some poetothy that was in the filth directors box that day.
Everyone signs duds. The key for us is that duds should be the least expensive not the most expensive in the squad.