That'll depend on the charges and penalty. Wouldn't it?What do you want to appeal?
They did, but they didn’t jeopardize the sporting bubble.No chance of that happening. Fast track isn't an option and those would require a scheduled hearing.
He will be available tomorrow, and should play imo. My feeling is he will also be available for Saturday and again should play. We have done our own internal disciplinary procedure, it's not up to us to do the SFA's job for them.
Completely disagree with thise asking for appeals. They fucked up and deserve to be punished. I think we should be accepting a ban for the players if/when they arrive.
Ffs do we call celtic or any other players the covid 3, the covid 13, the covid 8? Please do not use that scum papers headline to label these individuals like they were the first footballers involved with a covid scandal where label sticks!
I appreciate on here that is the way it was meant but you know what they are like and they would like nothing more than to make that label stick and follow these players around, well whilst they play in a rangers jersey anyway!You're reading too much into it mate. It's just a way of shortening it instead of writing out their names individually.
They won’t be going down this route as it’s not possible.Are we allowed to appeal and free him up for the game tomorrow? Cheers.
21stmentally challengeds on the 13th?
Yeah, which is why it’s went quiet. That and the SFA officials %^*& up two weekends ago.Gone very quiet. Surely the Dubai issue would be raised in counter if they tried to deal with our guys first.
It's not the same though St Mirren as a club didn't follow the correct protocols set by the SFA that players should follow and they had an outbreak as a result. They had games cancelled and were fined as a result.They did, but they didn’t jeopardize the sporting bubble.
St Mirren players were car pooling and breaking social distancing protocols in the training ground and canteen etc. The players did not receive individual bans, so how can our players be banned for effectively the same breach of rules?
I’m not condoning what they did but the footballing rules applied to their governmental rule break must be consistent.
Mostly correct mate but our guys will not be dealt with under a Fast Track Tribunal. They will be dealt with by a Disciplinary Tribunal. Fast Track is primarily for on-field offences and includes the offer of accepting a ban or submitting an Appeal. Disciplinary Tribunal has no advance punishment and the Principal Hearing to discuss the case and award a sanction is generally two weeks after citing.refgate is the biggy.
You need to be cited and then a fast track meeting is scheduled. Paterson is available 100% tomorrow.
Is Dubai even on the table for review?How many days since Dubai?
You’re right. We should and we will.Completely disagree with thise asking for appeals. They fucked up and deserve to be punished. I think we should be accepting a ban for the players if/when they arrive.
Simple, the club has followed every protocol to the letter and has punished the players internally. Why should the club be punished again especially when other clubs, one in particular have done worse and faced no sanctions at all, even when they've admitted breaches.What do you want to appeal?
No they said it wouldn't be investigated - same should apply hereIs Dubai even on the table for review?
The fast tracking of this case isn’t happening when the Dubai fiasco still hasn't been addressed or the linesman who officiated at the Hibs game when he should have been isolating.What do you want to appeal?
Any punishments, why should they be punished, Aberdeen got suspended punishment, Celtic got nothing for Dubai! I’d be really disappointed if any of them received a banWhat do you want to appeal?
It won't be dealt with via Fast Track, that's for on-field stuff. See post #61 mate.The fast tracking of this case when the Dubai fiasco still hasn't been addressed or the linesman who officiated at the Hibs game when he should have been isolating.
Be funny if he plays v the Tims and scores the goal that wins the leagueNo chance of that happening. Fast track isn't an option and those would require a scheduled hearing.
He will be available tomorrow, and should play imo. My feeling is he will also be available for Saturday and again should play. We have done our own internal disciplinary procedure, it's not up to us to do the SFA's job for them.
Completely disagree with thise asking for appeals. They fucked up and deserve to be punished. I think we should be accepting a ban for the players if/when they arrive.
bollox - it'll be x,y or z one of the Covid 5 from now on.You're reading too much into it mate. It's just a way of shortening it instead of writing out their names individually.
The fact that the maximum ban handed out with a Rangers player , is half what we received .What do you want to appeal?
Whips out hand sanitizer , starts dishing it out to all players in the celebration .Be funny if he plays v the Tims and scores the goal that wins the league
Ffs do we call celtic or any other players the covid 3, the covid 13, the covid 8? Please do not use that scum papers headline to label these individuals like they were the first footballers involved with a covid scandal where label sticks!
You can have a guy go half way around Europe , then go into training for days with no mention . And receive less than half what players going to a party receive .We should kick up a fuss and ask why our players are being punished before the Dubai lot...
mentally challengeds on the 13th?
They are criminals, they broke covid rules and were fined as a result.He'll play tomorrow and no reason he shouldnt.
Lets not call them the Covid 5, theyre not criminals and we shouldnt indulge fake news/views.
I'm really surprised there has been no movement on this from the SFA and would love to think it's because we are questioning them behind the scenes on their reticence to punish anyone involved with Dubaigate.
Calm down. Embarrassing shite.They are criminals, they broke covid rules and were fined as a result.
The Motherwell incident was a SPFL decision not the SFA.The SFA have made a rip roaring erse of all the Covid Breaches this season.
From Boli and the Aberdeen 8 getting such a lenient punishment, to throwing the book at Jones & Edmundson.
We then had the fiasco of Motherwell being awarded points for other team's Covid breaches, only to have them taken away again and they're now right in the relegation crapper.
Then the main event, the Dubai 49 which I believe will prevent the SFA from really hammering our players because they've been dragging their heels over investigating what went on in the UAE.
Our boys might get a more lenient suspension because of this because the SFA already made a rod for their own back with the retrospective reds for Alfie and Roofe while letting others off.
They couldn't hammer our players and let 49 players and staff away with flagrent breaches. However, it is the SFA we're talking about.
The fact not one of those cu*ta went to on a jolly came back with covid and not one of the cu*ts were banned.What do you want to appeal?
Sorry to disappoint but they are not criminals unless they went to court for not paying their fines!!!They are criminals, they broke covid rules and were fined as a result.
You seem the type that grassed the neighbours up for going two walks a dayThey are criminals, they broke covid rules and were fined as a result.
No.Have the player's been served notice by the SFA ?
On the grounds there’s other examples in Scottish football of players breaching the rules without being banned