Unfortunately for us we blew our 10 th title and in wee dicks last season the players never played for him there's 2 titles he was giftedI quite literally couldn't stand the sight of him back in the day but larsson was an outstanding scoring talent.
Anybody trying to dispute that fact just makes themselves sound stupid tbh.
The manky mob were gifted his signature for a pittance at a time where they so badly needed a player with the X factor to nick them a title. Unfortunately for us larson turned out to be that player.
Curiously enough I honestly believed pre Christmas we'd finally managed to repeat the trick with Morelos. Like larsson did for the mentally challengeds he looked a talisman for us , head and shoulders above his teammates looking every inch as though he'd come of age in Scottish football.
Rangers luck that all looks a distant memory now.
That’s tarriars for you. I expect nothing less of them. If they had a similar thread in Laudrup there’d be far less honesty I can assure you.
He scored against us 15 times in 30 games.
Larsson was excellent, lets not beat about the bush, just because he played for our arch rivals the OP is trying to re-write history.
I would have loved Larsson to have joined us from Feyenoord and what a player he would have been for us.
Can’t believe this thread is still going, brass neck.
Unfortunately for us we blew our 10 th title and in wee dicks last season the players never played for him there's 2 titles he was gifted
His career, post Celtic, would appear to render your suggestion of "overblown hype" as very silly indeed.He stunk the place out, not just in the 2002 scf but in other games against us apart from the 6-2 game he never did anything against us to merit his overblown hype, always seemed to struggle against us, unless my memory is on the slide.
Ffs.Decent but 1 in 2 not exactly phenomenal for the best striker ever (apparently).
Larsson was an outstanding player for them.
The thing I respected the most about him was that he never played to the Timmy gallery like a Di Canio or Broon for example.
He just got on with the job and let his ability do the talking.
None of this, look at me I’m a big plastic terrier mentality.
Just before htI honestly don't remember a chopped off goal, but that's not to say it didn't happen.
I do remember leaving the pub thinking we'd been mugged.
He was utterly sensational and anyone who says otherwise is in denial.
He was as good for them add Laudrup was for us. He went on to play at Barcelona ffs. He's a player that we'd have been drooling over if he had played for us.Larsson was a one man team at Celtic.
He was that good and that important to them.
Anyone who thinks he was overhyped is at it.
You miss the point. The craziness on this thread would have had Larsson winning the Ballon d'Or every season. He was never anywhere near that status. In fact, if its just reduced to a matter of goals Larsson scored, then Boyd being top SPL goalscorer 4 times or 5 times, better than Larsson, says he's a superior striker. Is this the ridiculous argument being played out ?