The irony there is that the same people would say Katic was poor against Livi (which is absolutely true) and we didn’t keep a clean sheet so that isn’t good enough. But we only conceded a goal against Livi because Arfield gave away a cheap penalty, so if that doesn’t happen and Livi don’t score does Katic get to walk off saying he did his job and it’s all hunky dory because we got a clean sheet, even though he blatantly didn’t play well? Because Goldson got lucky a few times last night and that seems to be more of less what some are doing here.
Gerrard is right, it’s nearly impossible to keep 4 CB’s happy, it’s even more difficult to do that when one of them is bulletproof and guaranteed a start. It’ll be hard to convince me that Katic isn’t being harshly treated, even more difficult when you’ve already seen the guy bombed out previously in favour of a bumbling loanee. Regular rotation of centre backs isn’t something that will work well (at the heart of all successful teams is a consistent and settled defence) so I’m sceptical about him getting much more game time too, in which case the end result will probably be the younger more promising defender (and the bigger financial asset) looking to get a move away.
That’s getting ahead of things, but it’s entirely possible. I’ve said since pre-season, consecutive poor games will see Katic dropped for a replacement and low and behold! Not being in the squad at all still leaves me puzzled too. But the bottom line is, having one undroppable defender who keeps his place even when his form is ropey to say the least, sends out the wrong message and goes against what the gaffer says. It wouldn’t be the first time he’s said one thing and done another though, he also said the guys who beat Celtic in December shouldn’t lose their place when they’re getting the results then proceeded to mix it up and work a half fit Davis and Defoe into the next line up.
And the “you can just tell some wanted us to get beat” shite is just that, shite, perpetuated by folk who don’t like the gaffer being questioned or challenged on his decisions (coincidentally they also tend to be posters who backed Worral as first pick). But I mean it’s a Rangers discussion forum, if it winds them up maybe this forum malarkey isn’t for them.