Just what I have been reading on here today.Never heard of this before or what papers it was advertised in
Would hazard a guess that it was either The Catholic Herald, The Tablet or the C***** View.Never heard of this before or what papers it was advertised in
Never thought of it that way so where did they recruit these volunteers stinks of Liewell again.Never heard of that. Never saw an advert. Was it in the Catholic Observer?
Hardly common knowledge.
Common knowledge mate
No you’re not.Hopefully I'm not the only one reading this and thinking WTF?
I have no idea what the OP is talking aboutOkay, what media outlets common knowledged it.
Would hazard a guess that it was either The Catholic Herald, The Tablet or the C***** View.
Never heard of that. Never saw an advert. Was it in the Catholic Observer?
Hardly common knowledge.
I have no idea what the OP is talking about
The Compliance officer has 100 volunteers who review the incidents he decides need looked into and they determine if any action is required as far as I can see,I have just found out about this today and was wondering was it common knowledge.I have no idea what the OP is talking about
Me either....
In that case, it must be 'common knowledge' that the vast majority of people at present, seem to know absolutely nothing about ......... which by definition, means it can't be 'common knowledge' at all.Common knowledge mate
We don't have any problems with Catholics in our team - it seems more like fans of other teams do.It's 2019 - we have many Catholic players and fans - leave this kind of chat back in the early 80s lads.
First I've heard of it, zero transparency as usual from the SFAThe people who review the incidents
The Compliance officer has 100 volunteers who review the incidents he decides need looked into and they determine if any action is required as far as I can see,I have just found out about this today and was wondering was it common knowledge.
And how can you come to an agreement with 100 peoples input? Unless they have a voting button, after they review the evidence. This is a typical sfa cluster %^*&.For clarification
Jimmy Ping interviewed Vincent Lunny the original CO in 2014 at BBC Scotland HQ
First I’d seen interview today. Was posted on here this morning
Lunny said 100 volunteers replied to SFA newspaper advert allegedly
All 100 were taken from lawyers. Judges. Etc to be on panels reviewing citations from SFA re incidents referred to CO
First I’d heard of this. I thought it was ex referees who reviewed the footage to assess the dodgy challenges
How the f.uck can these 100 volunteers have the expertise to make calls on football challenges
The whole CO is a sham and the club cannot accept this to continue
Action has to be taken and our manager must be sitting there and looking at Scottish football and thinking it’s exactly what the English commentators make it out to be a cesspit and full of amateurs
It's 2019 - we have many Catholic players and fans - leave this kind of chat back in the early 80s lads.
Am interview with Vincent lunny that's posted on another thread revealed that the panel who reviewed incidents was made up from 100 non paid volunteers after advertisements were placed in printed media.
Just the messenger mate I never heard of the advertising before . seems like a great idea how to hand pick the mindset neededWhich printed media and how has this guff never been picked by all factions of Rangers support on the internet from the off? Because there's a lot of sharp eyes out there on our side.
If you want to give me a one inch column on page 72 of the rhebel or evening tims after the contacts pages, feel free to do so.
But our Catholics are not Scottish Catholics that hate all things Rangers.It's 2019 - we have many Catholic players and fans - leave this kind of chat back in the early 80s lads.
They all said that volunteers were vetted by THREE officials. Who picked them and what were their criteria?
Just the messenger mate I never heard of the advertising before . seems like a great idea how to hand pick the mindset needed