More chance of them admitting they ran a Peado ring than giving us a title .
No it won’t if they try and award it we go to court plain and simple.I'm not sure where this idea about us conceding the title has came from. We'll not be asked to concede it. If the season doesn't finish the outcome of the 19/20 season will be out of our hands.
I reckon it would just be us and Hearts. Other clubs would probably be satisfied with the prize money as it stands as opposed to not getting any money at all if the season was null and voided.It’d be the authorities we’d be chasing.
Of course, would you be surprised if it transpired that there was only one club against any decision to award the league to them.
Quite uncool to quite your own lost but I'm doing it anyway.The debate needs to be turned completely on its head.
So most reasonable people would say we are expected to beat St Johnstone at home. Which would give them a 10 point lead and therefore from their perspective that is enough to be handed the title.
So to turn it on its head they must logically agree a 10 point lead would be enough would be enough to see Rangers crowned champions.
Now the reason they are shouting about getting the league is because they believe they have an unassailable lead.
So it would be a reasonable assumption to believe they a one goal lead isn't enough to be described as unassailable. Probably a two goal lead is not unassailable either. I'll say a three goal lead doesn't fit the criteria either.
Ok let's say goal difference isn't enough surely a reasonable person would say that with eight matches to go. So is it like point? Eh probably not that could be overturned yeah? Two points? Nah let's rule that out that's only one match yeah.
This leads us onto the crux of it. The question that they will never be able to answer is.
If the roles were reversed at which point would Rangers be awarded the title between one goal and ten points ahead?
What is the criteria used?