"When you lose 6 players who play in the front positions you have to sign some, they can't all play at the same time, they can't all play, if they play in the same position, that's obvious"
I really just can't get on board with that
No one is asking them to play at the same time, nothing like, he does need subs but with the limited budget he is sort of hinting at, it's just a matter of life most of that has to go into the first team as often as possible.
He thinks Matondo has played his way back in to the team OK - PSV at home aside has Matondo really been that good?
Was 20 minutes against Livvy and a game against Morton so much more "form" to justify his selection this season ahead of his signings he has made in the summer? That seems incredibly farfetched and at ends with a lot of his other selections where form seems to be very selective
And if he was picked on the premise of good form, why wasn't he taken out on Sunday given he wasn't good v PSV away
Surely last season over the likes of Kent who was going out the door was the time to let Matondo loose to see if we actually needed to sign to account for Matondo?
If Matondo was for instance a player he knew would feature this season, why wasn't he in our initial European squad and why did we need another winger?
If a team has given us a reasonable offer for Matondo in the window does anyone even think he would be here? He went from out the European squad and not featuring in a game Scott Wright did to starting a game in Europe within the space of 3 weeks, the Matondo experience at the moment is incredibly odd
You can't argue about Roofe playing v Celtic, OK, that's great but before that he had only played about 70 minutes of football against Killie, Morton and Ross County, again is that really form alone to merit such a start
I just can't get into what he is thinking and trying to justify and I know you apparently shouldn't over listen to these things will be said, but they are his words to justify things I am fascinated by, and to me, he is just talking p*sh