Corkie
Well-Known Member
I checked online and couldn't find it .Is it available online? I am not in the UK
I checked online and couldn't find it .Is it available online? I am not in the UK
Ok, thanks.
Hopefully someone will be able to take a photo of the paper or something.
I couldn't find it on the Mail's website, but I was able to read it here - https://www.pressreader.com/uk/scottish-daily-mail/textview
It's an admission of guilt .something they have denied publicly for years ..They knew OK and this proves itOnly £100,000?....surely needs to be way more than that?.
Could you copy and paste the text, I can't access this for some reason?
Tommy Sheridan’s reply has been forwarded to a certain journalist.
100 thousand pounds no wonder they settled this one, his solicitor should get fired what a disgrace for a life ruined, that's just unbelievable in this day and age.Only £100,000?....surely needs to be way more than that?.
This case would appear the victim was a first team player, or at least a full time professional and as such directly employed by the club as was McCafferty, they will continue with the separate entity defence in regards CBC players, they may have also managed to keep the identity secret which may be at the victims request.So how does that case, we're compensation has been paid. Help with the other victims, does it set precedent, can other victims point to it as proof, or are we still at where we were. Celtic claiming Seperate Entity and denial of the truth.
Floodgates are open...So how does that case, we're compensation has been paid. Help with the other victims, does it set precedent, can other victims point to it as proof, or are we still at where we were. Celtic claiming Seperate Entity and denial of the truth.
Stephen McGowan in the Daily Mail who has previously ignored mentioning anything about the child abuse scandal writes about it today under the heading off "It's time for Celtic to forget about the cost to their bank balance and the club's reputation and focus fully on JUSTICE FOR ALL"
Just about fell out of my chair when I read that, then looked at the front page and that's the main story too with two further pages inside with more details of the scandal.
The Daily Mail has hardly mentioned this story before but the cat is well and truly out of the bag now.
Stephen McGowan in the Daily Mail who has previously ignored mentioning anything about the child abuse scandal writes about it today under the heading off "It's time for Celtic to forget about the cost to their bank balance and the club's reputation and focus fully on JUSTICE FOR ALL"
Just about fell out of my chair when I read that, then looked at the front page and that's the main story too with two further pages inside with more details of the scandal.
The Daily Mail has hardly mentioned this story before but the cat is well and truly out of the bag now.
I agree. If they are in control of the narrative, it will undoubtedly be to minimize damage to reputation and finances. An independent inquiry is essential to get everything out there and hopefully bury them.Can't deny that does look like a shift, buster. I'm still wary of those bastards and their placemen manoeuvering to control how this plays out. That includes the appearance of a story hinting at £100k compensation which I'm sure the pederast protectors would be delighted with.
100 thousand pounds no wonder they settled this one, his solicitor should get fired what a disgrace for a life ruined, that's just unbelievable in this day and age.
While the exact sum to be paid has not been revealed, legal sources said based on previous payouts south of the Border it could be upwards of £100,000.[/QUOTE]
Bit weird paying out compensation for an entity that didn’t have anything to do with you...
Problem now is if this route ‘works’ for them. Will end up receiving ‘praise’ from the more compliant (Scottish) mhedia and might torpedo any chance of a proper, full and far-reaching, independent inquiry as to the whole series of events.
Surely by doing so they’re accepting the separate entity ruse is the load of old tosh we always knew it was?
Let’s see how the resolve of other victims stands up now that the biscuit tin is open.
It wasn’t about the money remember.
Surely by doing so they’re accepting the separate entity ruse is the load of old tosh we always knew it was?
Let’s see how the resolve of other victims stands up now that the biscuit tin is open.
It wasn’t about the money remember.
Are you implying it was?Surely by doing so they’re accepting the separate entity ruse is the load of old tosh we always knew it was?
Let’s see how the resolve of other victims stands up now that the biscuit tin is open.
It wasn’t about the money remember.
Surely the mhedia aren't that daft, or crass?
Imagaine if Saville was still alive, and the abuse was proven. I don't think the papers would say "yes, he commited this, but the good fellow has paid £100,000 each to child A, B and C..."