cheema bear
Well-Known Member
Bit weird paying out compensation for an entity that didn’t have anything to do with you...
They’re paying out cause he was a direct employee of them
Torbett worked for separate entity F.C.
Bit weird paying out compensation for an entity that didn’t have anything to do with you...
They look worse than ever now imo, and I'd imagine a pile on from the press.Surely the mhedia aren't that daft, or crass?
Imagaine if Saville was still alive, and the abuse was proven. I don't think the papers would say "yes, he commited this, but the good fellow has paid £100,000 each to child A, B and C..."
Who sorted the youth team's kit? He could be another linkThey couldn't deny the kitman was a Celtic employee. I still don't see them ditching their "separate entity" stance on their other beasts.
TheThe Daily Mail are running a two page spread.
Who sorted the youth team's kit? He could be another link
My info is the victims have been told to prepare themselves for court and all talk of compo/gagging orders is news to those close to it and that’s of 5 mins ago.
The
Daily mail mails comments section has been getting bombarded by me, I just slip in on any subject finance all sports, News items, etc,dont know if it helps, but i am sure one or two after seeing this " CELTICS DEMISE WILL COME FROM THE MOUTHS OF CHILDREN"" nothing else just that, i am sure it must pique someones interest, i cant do a lot but thats my wee war any thing we can do to get this out there,
Bit weird paying out compensation for an entity that didn’t have anything to do with you...
So how does that case, we're compensation has been paid. Help with the other victims, does it set precedent, can other victims point to it as proof, or are we still at where we were. Celtic claiming Seperate Entity and denial of the truth.
100 thousand pounds no wonder they settled this one, his solicitor should get fired what a disgrace for a life ruined, that's just unbelievable in this day and age.
Celtic have compensated this player because he played for Celtic FC and McCafferty was an employee of Celtic FC.
But don't be surprised if they still go down the separate entity route with Celtic Boys Club. They'll continue to try and wriggle their way out of this.
I genuinely hope this is the breakthrough the victims have been waiting for, but anyone expecting Celtic to come out with their hands in the air offering an unreserved apology for the misery caused and the lives they've ruined may be in for a disappointment.
Bit weird paying out compensation for an entity that didn’t have anything to do with you...
But, but, but I thought they were ‘separate entities’? Why would you pay compensation for somebody else’s crimes?
Aye right ya shower of beasts.
That's an admission of guilt, so there's nothing to stop an enquiry any more
They still haven't said sorry and owned up to it all.
Yes bud but it's fighting the good fight, for justice for the victims. McCafferty was an Celtic employee that is factual, he commited his heinous depravity on his victims regardless of whom they played or trained with. Celtic are liable regardless, he was their employee, therefore they are responsible for him whilst he was carrying out his employment, training young footballers under their and his auspices.McCafferty was an employee so there are still so many others subject to their separate entity claim mate.
Still a long way to go & a big fight to fight.
Yes bud but it's fighting the good fight, for justice for the victims. McCafferty was an Celtic employee that is factual, he commited his heinous depravity on his victims regardless of whom they played or trained with. Celtic are liable regardless, he was their employee, therefore they are responsible for him whilst he was carrying out his employment, training young footballers under their auspices.
If £100k is the precedent set them these pricks are going to get off lightly.
The predictions of them being fucked by this are wide of the mark by the looks of it.
And more importantly it's a paltry sum to the victims for a life ruined.
If they are volunteering payouts they will be much less than figures set by the courts. A bit like early settlers to the Americas swapping beads and mirrors for land. They'll target the weak and fallen first for minimum cost.
Are you implying it was?
No, I never thought you were implying other, I'm just pushing my thinking that as McCafferty was a Celtic employee, they are liable if he was carrying out his duties under that employment. But at the same time abused victims also, regardless to the status of the victims, ie Seperate Entity or notAbsolutely agree Jwee. Sorry if I implied otherwise.
All I’m saying is that these victims of Cairney & Torbett etc still need our relentless support too.
You know what that club is like.
BS and c_s, if I understand the story in the Mail right, the compensation is to an ex-employee (the victim) for sexual abuse by another ex-employee (McCafferty). Even Celtic knew that the 'separate entity' bullshit wouldn't work in this case.
But McCafferty was also a Celtic Boys Club coach so, that begs the question, 'If they're admitting liability to sexual assault by McCafferty on a Celtic FC player, how can they distance themselves from sexual assaults by the same perpetrator on boys in Celtic Boys Club?'
As you say Mexi, if nothing else, it makes a full, independent enquiry an absolute imperative, now.
I'm sure their lawyers will have considered all the implications of paying out this compensation, but it's down to the representatives of the Celtic Boys Club victims (who were assaulted not only by McCafferty but also by Torbett, Cairney, Cullen and Strachan) to make their respective cases as strong as possible.
But it doesn't stop there. The remit of an independent inquiry must also include full, criminal investigation of all those who covered up the abuse;
* Former directors, managers, coaches and players of Celtic FC and Celtic Boys Club,
* Politicians of all parties (from local Councillors to MSPs and MPs),
* Police officers of every level of seniority,
* Clergy,
* Journalists (news and sports).
Reports of sexual assaults on young boys are emerging all the time - in Scotland, England (with possible links to Barry Bennell), on the European mainland and in the US. I doubt if the full extent of these crimes will ever be known, but with what we do know already, this could be the worst example of organised child sexual abuse in the history of world sport.
NOBODY should be exempt either from scrutiny or from any resulting criminal and civil consequences.
Does the London Stock Exchange need to be notified that they are paying compo for crimes committed within the company.
No idea about corporate law, just asking .
If £100k is the precedent set them these pricks are going to get off lightly.
The predictions of them being fucked by this are wide of the mark by the looks of it.
And more importantly it's a paltry sum to the victims for a life ruined.
CELTIC PAY DAMAGES TO ABUSED EX-PLAYERCould you copy and paste the text, I can't access this for some reason?
Potential tampering with possible witnesses?Getting a little story through that Celtic's solicitors have sent out letters (and these are apparently in existence, as in provable) advising victims not to contact the authorities. More to come on it tomorrow when the full story is explained to me but it looks like a bit of a story brewing over it all.
I checked online and couldn't find it .
They will continue to name every other club that had a whiff of scandal, deny deflect and try whataboutery,there is a part of me saying hell mend you, you allowed celtic a free hand, your mouths were closed your eyes were shut all you could hear was big bad Rangers, in my eyes i couldnt give an Airborne copulation about any Club that thought it would be a good idea to put the Boot in to us , while handing the whole of Scottish football to the Bheasts, to do so as they wish,my dearest wish is to see Parkhead looking like Cathkin NowJust so happens the front page of the daily record today is about abuse at Motherwell - well done hollocom!!
They as a club have systematically stamped all over thr victims feelings, with their deflection and denial. The player in question was always going to be payed out. I'd say this would reinforce the victims resolve even more now, that payment and admission of guilt will be a slap in the face again for them.Let’s agree that keeping it out of court and paying an affordable amount of undisclosed compo is exactly what Lawwell and the Beasts want.
In fact I’d imagine this is what they’ve been trying to do behind the scenes since it first reared its many heads.
If they reach agreement with all the victims, they can then issue a public apology and their lackeys in the media will be at pains to stress how noble Celtic are to have righted the wrongs of previous Yahoo administrations.
In terms of satisfying the victims it may suffice, but they’ll have avoided the worst ravages of what is surely one of the biggest if not the biggest scandals in British sporting history.
BobbyShearer said:
Bit weird paying out compensation for an entity that didn’t have anything to do with you...
Im pretty sure no cleaner at GCC got 100k, weird post.scum to pay victims 100.000 for lives ruined and glasgow city council to pay part time cleaners the same going back ten years under equal pay.
in other news SNP prob up alex salmond bank account with more tax payers money up to £512,250
They as a club have systematically stamped all over thr victims feelings, with their deflection and denial. The player in question was always going to be payed out. I'd say this would reinforce the victims resolve even more now, that payment and admission of guilt will be a slap in the face again for them.