Statement: James Keatings | Scottish FA | News
www.scottishfa.co.uk
There now will be another which is a good thing but sets a precedent.
SFA back-tracking on Keatings' appeal
- Thread starter baselbear
- Start date
www.scottishfa.co.uk
There now will be another which is a good thing but sets a precedent.
nybear
Well-Known Member
just heard it, cowan and co patting them selves on the back.Statement: James Keatings | Scottish FA | News
There now will be another which is a good thing but sets a precedent.
sack the sfa
markkerrsbackpass
Well-Known Member
This is good news all round.
That system can simply not continue in it's current form.
That system can simply not continue in it's current form.
Thechemist
Well-Known Member
Wonder how many other times the correct process hasn’t been followed? Absolute joke of an organisation
WestEndGer18
Active Member
Not fit for purpose.
albertz is god
Well-Known Member
what a shambles. run by a shower of shite.
Have they %^*&. It’s working perfectly for them.
BobbyShearer55-65
Well-Known Member
Tribunal 'cannot be deemed competant' and the ruling 'cannot be deemed valid'.
Only telling us what we already know about these halfwits.
Only telling us what we already know about these halfwits.
Truckerman
Well-Known Member
They are making it up as they go along
yosser hughes
Well-Known Member
the whole lot need to be removed ,they have shown consistently they are not up to implicating the system in any manner of fairness or transparency ,from top to bottom they need purged,,
Valley Bluenose
RTV? Completed it mate!
So, they claim a panel member didn’t consider ‘ALL’ the evidence? That’s just lies. It’s not up to the panel to find their own evidence, they make their judgement based upon the evidence the SFA supplies them with. Their claim just doesn’t stack up at all.
In fairness to the player, it was never a second yellow/red card.
In fairness to the player, it was never a second yellow/red card.
Last edited:
The Golden God
Well-Known Member
They've thrown someone on the panel under the bus, that's even if the panel exists.
If it does, are they saying the panel member didn't even bother to look at the evidence?
If it does, are they saying the panel member didn't even bother to look at the evidence?
Smkz23
Well-Known Member
I suspect they’ve used that as an excuse due to the outcry and this person was leaving anyway so has taken one for the team.
“Specifically, one of the panel members“
Patsy found.
Patsy found.
The Goalie
Well-Known Member
Was one of the panel members Stevie Wonder?
The Golden God
Well-Known Member
If all the clubs band together here they could completely end this disciplinary nonsense from the sfa.
The Goalie
Well-Known Member
What about previous decisions made by this panel member?
JeffreySpaulding
Well-Known Member
Ridiculous decision in the first place but this sounds a made up reason as they knew they messed up.
Hope it is rejected again for a laugh.
Hope it is rejected again for a laugh.
thats the biggest issue, no clarity, no responsibility, just wing it.
I’m sure I heard that two of the three on the panel were “non football people”. What is that all about?
monkey magic
Well-Known Member
Making it up as they go along as usual.
GEEEDUBYA
Well-Known Member
Presumably found to be unfit i.e. fair and objective.
JMTrangers
Well-Known Member
It couldn't be more obvious that they're aware of the uproar and how outrageous the decision was and are now trying to cover their tracks.
Commentator
Well-Known Member
"Although everyone knew we phukked this up, we're still trying to get away with that whilst simultaneously admitting that we did phuk it up"
Bluenose25
Well-Known Member
At least the Inverness player has a chance now to play in the final. SFA are a joke.
Embra Bear
Well-Known Member
It was a clearly incorrect decision originally and not to overturn it but I wonder if all this fuss would have been made by the media if it was Alfie on the wrong end of that. 
Yes, and another was Ray Charles............
Wufty Bear
Well-Known Member
have lost all credibility. that's a fact, feckin roasters,
The Gooner
Well-Known Member
Embarrassing stuff from the amateur mob.
Community chest
Well-Known Member
Not fit for purpose
Div1872
Well-Known Member
Highlights how much of a shambles the process is
It was clearly never a yellow card offence and obvious an error by the ref
Not admitting the ref made a mistake was utterly pathetic and sums up the SFA
Keatings at least gets to play in the cup final which is the correct decision at last
It was clearly never a yellow card offence and obvious an error by the ref
Not admitting the ref made a mistake was utterly pathetic and sums up the SFA
Keatings at least gets to play in the cup final which is the correct decision at last
Blueranger45
Well-Known Member
so because the decision was against us, it's looked at again?
the decision was wrong and the player does deserve to play in the final but there wouldn't be as much outrage if it was one of our players that was sent off for a dive that wasn't one, infact there would probably be laughter from certain media sources
we've already had that before remember, Aluko years back when it was never a dive which got upheld. Alfie's had one when the keeper connected with him, the keeper got injured and we didn't get a penalty for it
the decision was wrong and the player does deserve to play in the final but there wouldn't be as much outrage if it was one of our players that was sent off for a dive that wasn't one, infact there would probably be laughter from certain media sources
we've already had that before remember, Aluko years back when it was never a dive which got upheld. Alfie's had one when the keeper connected with him, the keeper got injured and we didn't get a penalty for it
I haven't had much dealing with lawyers in my life - but, lawyers seem to generate work for lawyers............
The game was so much simpler before lawyers got involved..................
