Rangers ready to swoop for St Mirren’s Vaclav Hladky and complete Ianis Hagi deal

Anyway I think you're being very harsh on McGregor.

Even at his prime during Walter's second spell he never came for crosses much and his distribution has never been brilliant.

But for me he makes up for that in just about every other department.
His distribution and command of his area being bad 10 years ago doesn't really excuse it being bad now, I'm not sure what you're getting at with that.

He's a good shot stopper but in 2020 goalkeepers are expected to be more than that, all of the top ones are. He is incapable and approaching 40, there is a massive blindspot in our support with McGregor due to nostalgia
 
Pretty unhappy at the prospect of this, we should be signing a new number 1 rather than someone to sit on the bench

I think they have McCrorie lined up as a hopeful replacement in goal. So that would allow him to get more first team football on loan again in the SPFL or down south.
 
Pretty unhappy at the prospect of this, we should be signing a new number 1 rather than someone to sit on the bench

How much would a new number 1 to start ahead of mcgregor cost? Then there would be the wage mcgregor is being paid to effectively be a back up?

GK is one of the last positions we need to look at presently imo
 
How much would a new number 1 to start ahead of mcgregor cost? Then there would be the wage mcgregor is being paid to effectively be a back up?

GK is one of the last positions we need to look at presently imo
We're going to have to face that cost within a year regardless, I'd rather have the strongest possible team on the pitch
 
How much would a new number 1 to start ahead of mcgregor cost? Then there would be the wage mcgregor is being paid to effectively be a back up?

GK is one of the last positions we need to look at presently imo
exactly, i'm sure Gerrard agrees and knows that in the GK department we are alright. it wasn't GK errors that lost us the league (not to my knowledge, been a long season).
 
His distribution and command of his area being bad 10 years ago doesn't really excuse it being bad now, I'm not sure what you're getting at with that.

He's a good shot stopper but in 2020 goalkeepers are expected to be more than that, all of the top ones are. He is incapable and approaching 40, there is a massive blindspot in our support with McGregor due to nostalgia

Calling McGregor incapable is just stupidity and the calibre of GK you're after cost tens of millions.

We aren't singing a goalkeeper in his mid to late 20s who's a top class shot stopper, can ping a ball 30 yards like a midfielder and comes and snatches crosses through the air.

We aren't in that market anymore.
 
exactly, i'm sure Gerrard agrees and knows that in the GK department we are alright. it wasn't GK errors that lost us the league (not to my knowledge, been a long season).
There were definitely as many errors at GK as there was everywhere else across the pitch post January and you can't write it off as bad form as easily at that age.
 
His distribution and command of his area being bad 10 years ago doesn't really excuse it being bad now, I'm not sure what you're getting at with that.

He's a good shot stopper but in 2020 goalkeepers are expected to be more than that, all of the top ones are. He is incapable and approaching 40, there is a massive blindspot in our support with McGregor due to nostalgia
Wes could play out from the back but couldn't stop any shot from range bottom left or right. i know which one i'd rather, each to their own opinions however i expect more people to quote you on your comments and say that it just isn't a priority.

if we have a £10m budget for the summer, £4m on Hagi, that leaves £6m. Would you rather 2 x £3m signings for up front and defence, or £3m on a keeper? i know what Gerrard would rather.
 
Calling McGregor incapable is just stupidity and calibre of GK you're after cost tens of millions.

We aren't singing a goalkeeper in his mid to late 20s who's a top class shot stopper, can ping a ball 30 yards like a midfielder and comes and snatches crosses through the air.

We aren't in that market anymore.
I'm saying he is incapable of playing in the style that would benefit the team the most, I'm not calling him useless.

Something simple that happens every game at least once: Goldson/Helander/whoever open their bodies up to let McGregor run out and deal with a loose ball entering the penalty area, he doesn't leave his line so the CB has to knock it out for a throw/corner. This happens every week, go back and watch if you don't believe me.

We could and should upgrade
 
it's all about our priorities i suppose. can we get someone in that pulls off some of the saves mcgregor does? we will have a tighter wage bill than last year, why strengthen one of the strongest areas of the pitch when we have other priorities? both full back positions need strong competition, midfield needs adding to and we need quality up front. Hladky is well rated

I agree. I for one feel we need a strong, commanding CB.
 
I'm saying he is incapable of playing in the style that would benefit the team the most, I'm not calling him useless.

Something simple that happens every game at least once: Goldson/Helander/whoever open their bodies up to let McGregor run out and deal with a loose ball entering the penalty area, he doesn't leave his line so the CB has to knock it out for a throw/corner. This happens every week, go back and watch if you don't believe me.

We could and should upgrade
You dont half talk some amount of shet
 
Maybe Robby McCrorie is the long term replacement but he needs a full season on loan. We address that situation next summer after a season loan.

I'd say there are priority areas before Allan McGregor. Right back, midfield for example.

I can see where you are coming from RE: McGregor. For the style we look to play his inability to deal with crosses and distribution is a problem. He also began to show his age at times last season and whilst Tavernier, Katić or Goldson were being blamed, McGregor was making errors too. He's still got qualities though.

Can't really remember Hladky tbh. He'll barely feature if signed.
Why does he need a season on loan, if he's good enough he's old enough. Im getting fed up not giving youths a chance
 
Good, young Robbie needs first team football so a loan is better for him than sitting on the bench.

McGregor could still break his leg at any point, so a capable and experienced back up to him is an absolute necessity. Hladky has always impressed me when I’ve seen him.
 
How much have you seen of Robbie?
A fair bit, I watched the entirety of every game he played at Livi.

Again, decent shot stopper(which some have interpreted as an insult for some reason) and pretty subpar at everything else, should we go from McGregor to McCrorie, we are essentially going sideways.
 
"Buying a player then selling him straight on would potentially fall foul of FIFA."

I might be wrong, but is that not what Frankfurt done with Jovic? Had him on loan from Benfica, he tore the league up, they bout him for his option of around £7M then sold him to Madrid for £50M+?
 
Pretty unhappy at the prospect of this, we should be signing a new number 1 rather than someone to sit on the bench
We have a number 1 and my thinking is we have his replacement too. We need back up while his replacement gains experience on loan.
 
We're going to have to face that cost within a year regardless, I'd rather have the strongest possible team on the pitch

When we do face that cost, we likely won't be paying mcgregor aswell though

I'll ask again, how much would it cost to replace mcgregor with a better keeper both in fee and wages?

Money that could be better spent improving the rest of the starting 11 imo
 
Would be a sensible bit of business! We don’t need to spend fortunes on a backup goalkeeper.
 
We have a number 1 and my thinking is we have his replacement too. We need back up while his replacement gains experience on loan.
Not a fan of the idea but If McCrorie is definitely the future, he should be given that jersey now.

There will be no noticeable downgrade
 
Maybe Robby McCrorie is the long term replacement but he needs a full season on loan. We address that situation next summer after a season loan.

I'd say there are priority areas before Allan McGregor. Right back, midfield for example.

I can see where you are coming from RE: McGregor. For the style we look to play his inability to deal with crosses and distribution is a problem. He also began to show his age at times last season and whilst Tavernier, Katić or Goldson were being blamed, McGregor was making errors too. He's still got qualities though.

Can't really remember Hladky tbh. He'll barely feature if signed.


I don't think anyone would disagree that Tav is comfortably the best right back in the league.

I think replacing him will be well down Gerrard's list of priorities mate.
Unless of course the club receive an acceptable offer for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jeb
I don't think anyone would disagree that Tav is comfortably the best right back in the league.

I think replacing him will be well down Gerrard's list of priorities mate.
Unless of course the club receive an acceptable offer for him.

Take the captaincy off him then. It's too much weight on his shoulders. Also needs to rein it in with his comments, he's not the only one though.
 
Take the captaincy off him then. It's too much weight on his shoulders. Also needs to rein it in with his comments, he's not the only one though.


I agree with you that Tav isn't a natural captain, but I don't see one jumping out at me from within our squad, with the possible exception of Goldson.

The one thing I will say in Tav's favour is he never hides and tries to lead by example.
 
I agree with you that Tav isn't a natural captain, but I don't see one jumping out at me from within our squad, with the possible exception of Goldson.

The one thing I will say in Tav's favour is he never hides and tries to lead by example.
I agree, however I do think its a weight on his shoulders he could do without.

But as you say, there isn’t another in the squad.
 
I agree, however I do think its a weight on his shoulders he could do without.

But as you say, there isn’t another in the squad.


I agree with that.

There's no Greig or Butcher in this squad unfortunately.
 
Sensible low cost bridging option between McGregor and likely McCrorie. Firth will always be our low cost 3rd choice option.

Allows us to sign and prioritise spending in other areas.
 
i'm going to go against the grain here and say i'm not a massive fan of Mcgregor and i think this boy could be our main keeper. for me i think Mcgregor has not been at his best last season and i would be happy to see him replaced. i know its not going to be a popular opinion.
 
Sounds like an Alexander type signing.

That’s good enough for me.

McCrorie then needs a full top 6 loan or English Championship for a year.

Firth is there to grab the balls - nothing else, thankfully.
 
Its a no brainer imo to sign Vladky, maybe for 2 years.
10 clean sheets out of 30, we likely werent much better than that.
Knows the league and players, free, 29 is a decent age for expierence.
 
According to The Post.


Rangers are looking to sign a back-up to Allan McGregor, and a move for St Mirren’s Vaclav Hladky is likely this week.

With Wes Foderingham and Jak Alnwick both being freed by the club, the Light Blues are searching for cover for former Scotland internationalist McGregor.

Robby McCrorie will return from a loan stint with Livingston, but Steven Gerrard wants an experienced keeper for the domestic and European campaigns that lie ahead.

And while Saints boss Jim Goodwin has pledged to do everything he can to hold on to Hladky – whose contract with the Buddies is about to expire – the 29-year-old Czech is very much the obvious option.

His form – an impressive 10 clean sheets in 30 Premiership games in the 2019-20 campaign – coupled with his imminent availability, has drawn attention from both sides of the border.

Before the last transfer window, he himself spoke of interest from Rangers, while Celtic are also known to be admirers.

Sunderland and, somewhat more exotically, MLS side Houston Dynamo, are others who have been linked.

It is the possibility of the switch to Ibrox, though, which would be likely to hold most appeal.

As much as McGregor is very much the dominant No. 1, at 38 years old he is approaching the end of his playing career.

Wages would not be likely to present a problem, with Goodwin having been frank enough to admit there would not be much they could do about it if someone was to come in with a bigger or better offer.

Signing a player with proven ability in the Scottish top flight would also fit in with Rangers new recruitment strategy, with Aberdeen’s Lewis Ferguson and Livingston’s Lyndon Dykes other summer targets.

© Ross Parker/SNS Group
Ianis Hagi
Meanwhile, Lazio are not ready to give up on their hopes of landing Ianis Hagi.

Rangers have first option to buy the 21-year-old Romanian under the terms of the loan deal struck with parent club Genk in January.

They look set to try to exercise it too, with reports in Hagi’s homeland stating a £4-million fee has been agreed between the clubs.

However, Lazio – whose manager Simone Inzaghi and sporting director Igil Tare are big admirers of the midfielder – are not convinced all is lost.

So much so, in fact, that even if Rangers take up their option to buy the son of 124-cap Romanian legend, Gheorghe, they would not rule out trying to land him by offering an instant seven-figure profit on their purchase.

Buying a player then selling him straight on would potentially fall foul of FIFA.

But the coronavirus crisis is liable to lead to a huge shake up of the regulations concerning this summer’s transfer windows, with many countries in a very different place in terms of their domestic campaigns.

Lazio would have the alternative, too, of hanging fire until January and going back in then to Rangers with an offer.

Adrian Mutu, the Romania Under-21s coach, knows all about Hagi, and believes an eventual switch to the Italian capital would be beneficial for his development.

“I like Hagi Junior. At his age, it is normal to have ups and downs,” he said.

“He played some good games in Scotland, and I think that showed he is well on his way to growing.

“I think he could do very well with Lazio. Inzaghi likes to play with a lot of pace and strike from deep, and for me that is a style of football Hagi Junior could adapt to very well.”

Genk paid Vittorul Constanta £4m for Hagi when he was just 19.

However, while he has impressed as a player of genuine potential, he was unable to hold down a regular first team place with the Belgians so is being allowed to move on.

All of these "rumours" are straight off follow follow.
 
Back
Top