Gio#56
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
No because it’s not Alfie MorelosNever seen that before
Wrong dateMcCoist bang on the money
That wasn’t from the midweek game mate.This was just their last game FFS
No it wasn't, their midweek game was at the piggery.This was just their last game FFS
Last season HB but it’s clear as day an agenda against our player and club.This was just their last game FFS
That wasn’t from the midweek game mate.
It is worse. He stops, turn round and clearly stamps.Not the last game but that has to be shown as on a par (worse IMO) with Alfie.
Makes you think our lawyer could tie them up in knots, think we only get a written response on reasons for the ban if we appeal it. If I've got that right Could it be worth the appeal to see what they've said?Last season HB but it’s clear as day an agenda against our player and club.
Scum were at home midweek.This was just their last game FFS
Not to make light of the situation but how can that be their last game when there’s fans in?
We have to appeal against this. We have rolled over far to many times. We must call them out.
Need to get the basics right when showing facts.It doesn't really matter when it took place, it totally highlights the difference between them and us regarding retrospective punishment.
Where are the “brings it on himself“ throbbers who would still miss the point if it smacked them across the face like a wet fishThese are the incidents Rangers should be using to defend Morelos.
You simply can’t have one rule for Rangers, and other rules for the rest of the league.
What the media are failing to question is not are the incidents red cards but why only some? Let's scratch beneath the surface, immediately the difference is one is a Rangers player and if people are brave enough they might scratch further down and find it's personal with Morelos.
Ha, did not even notice. Stupid nephew said it was last week and me being more stupid believed him. But the difference between them and us regarding compliance officer still standsScum were at home midweek.
And the crowd probably suggests otherwise too
Defo looks last season, regardless of when it was though, these are the inconsistencies that need addressing the compliance clown, legal firm or whatever they are called now, cannot just single out one individual in one particular team even if he makes it easy for them or not, but then go on to ignore and not even consider, review, look at or even comment on identical incidents or worse by other teamsI think it’s from last season at Hamilton.
100%Ha, did not even notice. Stupid nephew said it was last week and me being more stupid believed him. But the difference between them and us regarding compliance officer still stands
Brown against St Johnstone
I totally agree and yes I get the whole Alfie doesn’t help himself blah blah ! But the point is , it’s double standards. Yiu can’t demand one player gets a red on retrospective but others get away with same if not worse. And it doesn’t matter which season. It’s the process. Scum protecting scum as far as I am concerned. And if there’s any millwall fans reading this good luck with porteous. He’s shite. And he wouldn’t give it the hard man shite off the pitch either.Makes you think our lawyer could tie them up in knots, think we only get a written response on reasons for the ban if we appeal it. If I've got that right Could it be worth the appeal to see what they've said?