Yip we will also be furloughing the staff
Nothing has been announced about staff being furloughed but not all furloughed workers are losing 20% of wages
Been struggling for opportunities to take a snipe at our players recently? Really squeezing this one in.
Have they furloughed the other staff.?Correct, in which I think is wrong.
Furthough the staff who will lose 20% of their pay yet the players will still get their 15k plus salary a week eventually.
I would prefer they took a 30% cut.
Eases the financial burden on the club,with little or no money coming in ,it’s a sensible action to take.
I know as much as everyone whos saying that its a great idea. Im giving my opinion as to what we know thus far.We have no idea of the inner workings or decision making from the club or footballing staff. How do you know if it's poor or not at this stage?
Cost isn’t the issue, it’s the cash flow.I would prefer they took a 30% cut.
Have they furloughed the other staff.?
no, this is much better for the club’s cash flow. Trust the Board there are plenty of Accountants and Financial experts on it
To be fair it’s not brilliant is it? They’re not actually giving anything up, just collecting some of their dough a little later than usual.
As someone else said, if they furlough the staff with no actual cuts I’d be quite disappointed with that.
Shite patter
Where are you hearing this ?
Where is it being reported?
Surely a 30% cut would be better than owing management money down the line?no, this is much better for the club’s cash flow. Trust the Board there are plenty of Accountants and Financial experts on it
for coming forward without needing to be asked to take cuts. It was the right way to go about itFor what?
There’s nothing to stop Rangers putting staff on furlough and paying the 20% shortfall.Correct, in which I think is wrong.
Furthough the staff who will lose 20% of their pay yet the players will still get their 15k plus salary a week eventually.
Just maybe the money they save from the higher earners will ensure the other staff don’t need to be furloughedTo be fair it’s not brilliant is it? They’re not actually giving anything up, just collecting some of their dough a little later than usual.
As someone else said, if they furlough the staff with no actual cuts I’d be quite disappointed with that.
for coming forward without needing to be asked to take cuts. It was the right way to go about it
Eases the burden for the next 3months,season ticket money will be available after this period.How does it ease the financial burden?
At some point down the line the players will get what they are owed even though there will be next to no cash flow prior to this.
We have no idea how this decision came to be, how much the players/management were involved in the offers or decision making, whether they refused something more 'gracious' or not and we don't know what happens if circumstances change.
Put simply, we know very little. So why use it as an opportunity to have a go at the players?
Maybe!Correct, in which I think is wrong.
Furthough the staff who will lose 20% of their pay yet the players will still get their 15k plus salary a week eventually.
Rooney hit this square on the head when he asked if bankers , fund managers actors and other major earners are being hounded like football players, yes players get well paid but not the only people who do, a top footballer will be on 40 or 50% tax off their money right away.Correct, in which I think is wrong.
Furthough the staff who will lose 20% of their pay yet the players will still get their 15k plus salary a week eventually.
Cost isn’t the issue, it’s the cash flow.
Just maybe the money they save from the higher earners will ensure the other staff don’t need to be furloughed
Then they shouldnt accept the full 100% deferral further down the line.Cost isn’t the issue, it’s the cash flow.
Some are wealthy some are notWe know they’ve agreed to collect some of their money a few months later. That’s about as much as we need to know. I mean you’d imagine the idea of small but temporary cuts was discussed because that really would benefit the club much more, and well we can fill in the blanks.
I’m not having a massive go, they have contracts and they’re entitled to the money, I just won’t be massively singing their praises or kowtowing to them for agreeing to collect some of their cash a little later than usual during a crisis, given they’re all very wealthy individuals.
Just maybe the money they save from the higher earners will ensure the other staff don’t need to be furloughed
Just maybe the money they save from the higher earners will ensure the other staff don’t need to be furloughed
And so they should. Are you unhappy with this or something?But they are not taking cuts , what they are entitled to they will get at a later date.
That’s not what I call taking cuts .
It’s true. They’re doing nothing and still getting paid. A 20or 30% wage cut would have been a great gesture. That’s all it is a loan they are still going to get there wagesBeen struggling for opportunities to take a snipe at our players recently? Really squeezing this one in.