Aberdeen get to hear and see VAR transcripts.

Bear all

Bear all

Well-Known Member
Below is part of a statement released by Aberdeen about their disallowed goal against Livingston,why where we not given access.The other night the commentator on Sky confirmed yet again he could hear the VAR team deliberating,yet there was none in the game at the Piggery when Johnston used his hand deliberately in the box why aren’t we asking why Aberdeen whee given access and we were denied.


However, that position is no longer tenable following a meeting earlier this week with the Scottish FA, where the club was provided an opportunity to see and hear the transcripts relating to Saturday’s disallowed goal in the Scottish Premiership match versus Livingston.
 
We all fingers know why, mentally challenged bastards running the show. Sitting with a niece just now who is one of them she's arguing with me Scales just did handle the ball but it was never in the box. Even under slow motion and with me pausing it she's still arguing the point.
 
Bear all said:
Below is part of a statement released by Aberdeen about their disallowed goal against Livingston,why where we not given access.The other night the commentator on Sky confirmed yet again he could hear the VAR team deliberating,yet there was none in the game at the Piggery when Johnston used his hand deliberately in the box why aren’t we asking why Aberdeen whee given access and we were denied.


However, that position is no longer tenable following a meeting earlier this week with the Scottish FA, where the club was provided an opportunity to see and hear the transcripts relating to Saturday’s disallowed goal in the Scottish Premiership match versus Livingston.
Click to expand...
We were given access to the audio.

The club said they’d heard it and wanted it made public.
 
Bluenose1979 said:
We were given access to the audio.

The club said they’d heard it and wanted it made public.
Click to expand...
yip , and that was blanked and our club seem to have gone along with it, that its contents never been "leaked" to fan or friendly media from within the club may suggest there was no smoking gun
 
Bear all said:
Didn’t know that there obviously wasn’t any discussion about how they came to the offside on the audio because it didn’t happen till well after the incident.
Click to expand...

All of I've seen of the Sima " offside " has been a dodgy graphic drawn by etch-a-sketch.
 
Bear all said:
So what we would get would be no discussion by VAR of how they came to their decision of offside .
Click to expand...
Offside had nothing to do with the original decision.

Collum decided there was nothing to see. That was the VAR decision.

The offside was a retrospective thing looked at/found later as an “wouldn’t have counted anyway” arse-covering. It was never revealed who asked for that to be released later in the game.

Hence all the shit at the time when the club didn’t want Collum doing our games anymore and wanted the audio published.

Instead, refs circled wagons and the media put the boot into Rangers over the Collum demand.
 
Bluenose1979 said:
Offside had nothing to do with the original decision.

Collum decided there was nothing to see. That was the VAR decision.

The offside was a retrospective thing looked at/found later as an “wouldn’t have counted anyway” arse-covering. It was never revealed who asked for that to be released later in the game.

Hence all the shit at the time when the club didn’t want Collum doing our games anymore and wanted the audio published.

Instead, refs circled wagons and the media put the boot into Rangers over the Collum demand.
Click to expand...
Correct the penalty should have been awarded then Johnston (sent off 2nd yellow), the whole protocol of VAR was broken,there was no communication of any Offside decision being debated at any time in the match.
 
Didn’t they say the protocol is that audio would be available (to clubs or public?) something like 12 weeks after the game…?

We should not forget this.
 
Bear all said:
Correct the penalty should have been awarded then Johnston (sent off 2nd yellow), the whole protocol of VAR was broken,there was no communication of any Offside decision being debated at any time in the match.
Click to expand...
They would've checked the offside, given offside, cancelled the penalty and the 2nd yellow card, the argument is, that should've been the process
 
brand69 said:
They should have had a penalty today. Scales hand ball.
Click to expand...
I saw a clip which has been highlighted where a bheast defender on a yellow puts in another stonewaller yellow card tackle and it was ignored.

Id assume Aberdeen / Peter Leven will demand further context on that decision as i can see no other reason for not giving another yellow other than the colour of strip he was wearing.
 
Aberdeen, more than any other club, are VERY happy to talk utter rubbish about Rangers gaining an advantage via corrupt refs. Well, this is the result. Referees TERRIFIED to give a decision against Celtic. You can see it play out in every game they play now.
 
Not sure if this is what you’re saying but I am sure Crocker made quite a few references towards the VAR audio during that old firm game.
 
Funny how the scales hand ball they had some the strangest angles for replays, yet at the other end for Aberdeen's penalty claim they managed to dig out some sort of Aerial camera that showed much more of what was going on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Latest posts

Back
Top