The games in which we've been on the end of mistaken decisions, haven't cost us points either...
The argument could actually be, they HAVE been on the end of a game changing decision that cost them points - the Hearts game at Tynecastle
They also haven't been on the end of a mistaken decision that has gifted them points...
So not sure what your point is really... you want referees to make more mistakes and them to be on the end of them?
The first “game changing” decision was to incorrectly award celtic a penalty early doors.
13 minutes in V Hearts at 0-0, game changing, game defining call it what you want. That goes in what happens afterwards probably didn’t happen as the play doesn’t follow the same pattern.
The decision to send off Yang was the correct decision. Even Brendan Rodgers knows the rules, a couple of weeks earlier at St Mirren Park Rodgers, agreed with the sending off, explaining why it is a red card:
“The guy’s not meaning to do it, but of course if you’re taking a stud in the eye, it’s dangerous play. It was clearly a red card.”
Nick Walsh cost Hibs points v them. At 1-1 with Hibs all over them he books Boyle for diving when there was clear contact, more than what he gave celtic for at Tynecastle earlier in the season. He awarded celtic 2 penalties, that night the first after 10 minutes, making history for the first penalty given in Scottish football for a clash of heads.
Nick Walsh is partial to awarding celtic penalties, particularly early settlers too. He has refereed 4 celtic games and awarded them 4 penalties, he also instructed a review for another when on VAR.
I don’t know why a panel can view both the Celtic penalty given at Tynecastle earlier in the season and Hibs denied v celtic at Easter Road both by the same ref and say both decision on almost identical incidents are correct, you can’t have different outcomes for the same thing.