Cracking finish that. The VAR delay probably stopped him getting booked as well.
VAR. VAR. Penalty!! . LOL
Cheers, must have been clear and obvious to the VAR team when they seen the replay.Clear and obvious error is the exact wording FIFA use in their VAR guide.
Like, very much like.Got a wee soft spot for Ajax for some reason....
Cheers, must have been clear and obvious to the VAR team when they seen the replay.
To be honest I thought it should have stood until I seen the replay as well, frustrating for fans at the game...
Game over
If it takes over 3 minutes to make a decision then it isnt a clear and obvious error in the first place.Cheers, must have been clear and obvious to the VAR team when they seen the replay.
To be honest I thought it should have stood until I seen the replay as well, frustrating for fans at the game...
Similar to the compliance officer then!It’s not the intended purpose. It’s being used inconsistently. That’s a massive issue. It’s not a level playing field if referees pick and choose when they can use it.
Not a fan of Madrid at all. Thought Ajax were excellent but lacked the killer touch a few times. Would love them to get through but can’t see it nowExcellent game of football enjoyed it, Ajax gave it everything their effort was superb and so one was some of their 1 touch stuff... draw would have been the right result but winning away from home when the opposition play well is the sign of a top class side. Dont see the 2nd game being as good but if the Dutch get a goal never know.
It’s not the ref who calls for the use VAR. They have a team of officials somewhere in the stadium watching monitors of every angle available to them who recommend the ref take a look at it. The ref has the choice to listen to them or ignore themIt’s not the intended purpose. It’s being used inconsistently. That’s a massive issue. It’s not a level playing field if referees pick and choose when they can use it.
Having seen it back many times, I am still a bit torn. On first inspection, it seems incredibly harsh. By the absolute letter of the law, it is probably just about right but still appears harsh.Bit
And it looks like it was given for interfering with the keeper, not offside.
Shite decision
The player standing in front of the keeper ( actually making contact and impeding him ) is clearly offsideAbsolutely nothing wrong with that goal. Terrible terrible decision.
Come on Ajax. Intae them
It’s not the ref who calls for the use VAR. They have a team of officials somewhere in the stadium watching monitors of every angle available to them who recommend the ref take a look at it. The ref has the choice to listen to them or ignore them
Watching it on the highlights again and, although I hate to say it, it was right to rule it out.Having seen it back many times, I am still a bit torn. On first inspection, it seems incredibly harsh. By the absolute letter of the law, it is probably just about right but still appears harsh.
I know, a close decision and ultimately right but as an Ajax fan you would be going away agrieved (despite it actually being correct). Real didn’t appeal either, which made it harder to take but just about right. Hopefully they eventually refine VAR to eventually make it smoother.Watching it on the highlights again and, although I hate to say it, it was right to rule it out.
He's offside and he is interfering with the keeper.