Just to clarify, I'm not saying I've felt ripped off.
We know more than anyone about the power of our spending though, so I do think that this is a conversation that deserves a little more nuance than simply "we won, so it was worth it". There's always discussions on here around renewal time about price increases and 'what is fair', I don't see this as any different.
Directors have ploughed millions in which I'm sure we'll all be hugely grateful for, but they will also receive the equity in the club via shares along with that. So, for them, whilst more expensive, it is an investment.
We're fans and whilst we can take credit for sticking with the team through thick and thin, in this transaction, we're customers and the product received (a stream) was not proportionate to the cost. I actually consider myself lucky that my ticket is on the low end of the cost scale, but for those that don't see the issue, where do you draw the line? By the logic of team loyalty, should we all just transfer over whatever is left in the bank account each month?
Club 1872's shareholding is going to be significantly diluted by the fresh injections of funds by our more significant shareholders, does that seem right given the money that has been provided by fans in this particular instance?
In this one season, should we be considered less as customers and more as investors? You can see from all the more positive responses here that there is an ambiguity about that which has been taken advantage of.