You only need to see who wrote that,supporter with a typewriter.Would he say the same about us next season?
We would but who’d support the idea?They shouldn't be, if the shoe was on the other foot we would be saying exactly the same thing
Our co-efficient is in the gutter. Once we build it back up we won't have to navigate so many rounds.They shouldn't, if you win the league you should get an automatic place.
Well this isn't the system, as numerous leagues get more than 1 team in, including 4 leagues which take up half the automatic slots.So if you’re the champions of, say, San Marino you should get an automatic place in the group stage?
I’m sure you wouldn’t argue that. Therefore, there has to be a cut off point.
How about - the top x number of national champions get in automatically, whilst the remaining number of national champions have anything from one to four qualifying ties to negotiate. And how about we determine what nations’ champions get the automatic spots by having a co-efficient system for the national leagues.
Well hey presto, this is exactly the system we have now. And Scotland does not have a divine right to always be one of the nations whose champions waltz straight in to the group stage. We have such a lowly co-efficient due to the poor performance of our clubs, including ourselves.
If Celtic don’t qualify for the group stage then they can save their tears - if you don’t make it you don’t deserve to be there. Same with us with the Europa League.
You either win or lose in sport. If another team are better than you and knock you out then too bad.
Get a grip.Exactly. The obsession with Celtic on here is unreal.
Well this isn't the system, as numerous leagues get more than 1 team in, including 4 leagues which take up half the automatic slots.
I agree that coefficient is the best way to do it, but having the system 'rigged' in favour of the top 4/5 leagues in Europe's is not a fair system IMO
The shoe will never be on the other foot though.
We'll never see clearly Rangers supporting jounalists given licence to write articles which wouldn't look out of place in a club magazine
I'd welcome a ban on discussing Celtic or at least keeping it contained to a single thread which I can avoid going in. Every second comment is about them now its sickening. As for keeping an eye on what our enemies are up to - Is your sense of victimhood that strong that you now equate SPL winner to Celtic? What's good for the league winner is good for us, potential champions in waiting.Get a grip.
This isn’t obsession.
This is simply watching what the enemies are rip to.
What is today’s throwaway comment will become a policy debate soon enough.
Then a proposal.
However you keep fiddling away.
The reason we have to play 4 qualifiers is because the co-efficient is in the gutter. People like Cameron couldn't have cared less about this when they booted us down to division 3. They will just have to suck it up."Celtic shouldn't have to play European qualifiers"
He doesn't actually say that though, does he?
"Not for a moment am I suggesting Celtic ought to be parachuted straight to the group stages, and I'm not even suggesting they go straight into the play off"
Not sure what people are trying to achieve here. I agree with him, too many qualifiers for Rangers in europa, too many qualifiers for them in the CL. When we are there I will feel the exact same way.
So if you’re the champions of, say, San Marino you should get an automatic place in the group stage?
I’m sure you wouldn’t argue that. Therefore, there has to be a cut off point.
How about - the top x number of national champions get in automatically, whilst the remaining number of national champions have anything from one to four qualifying ties to negotiate. And how about we determine what nations’ champions get the automatic spots by having a co-efficient system for the national leagues.
Well hey presto, this is exactly the system we have now. And Scotland does not have a divine right to always be one of the nations whose champions waltz straight in to the group stage. We have such a lowly co-efficient due to the poor performance of our clubs, including ourselves.
If Celtic don’t qualify for the group stage then they can save their tears - if you don’t make it you don’t deserve to be there. Same with us with the Europa League.
You either win or lose in sport. If another team are better than you and knock you out then too bad.
Celtic are scum, that's all I can add.
Based on a victory over a team who's ground holds just over 600 and looks like a Scottish Junior teams venue?
Celtic have proved season after season they are no where near CL standard. They get rag dolled by the big boys time and time again.
I know its tough guys but FFS keep it real.
Moronic brain dead mentally challenged media.
Ridiculous assertion.I'd welcome a ban on discussing Celtic or at least keeping it contained to a single thread which I can avoid going in. Every second comment is about them now its sickening. As for keeping an eye on what our enemies are up to - Is your sense of victimhood that strong that you now equate SPL winner to Celtic? What's good for the league winner is good for us, potential champions in waiting.
The shoe will never be on the other foot though.
We'll never see clearly Rangers supporting jounalists given licence to write articles which wouldn't look out of place in a club magazine
No league champions should have to play 3 play off games, one yes if your not in the top leagues but 3 is a joke
They shouldn't, if you win the league you should get an automatic place.
No, it’s the Champions league not the fourth place league, I can remember we got knocked out a few years ago and an English team went into the group stages never having won the league infact it was their debut in European footballIf they don’t win them all UEFA have been proven right mate. No ?
There is still something inherently wrong about a ‘Champions’ league where a fourth placed team gets an automated place because of the country they come from.
UEFA want the same clubs in it year on year. Driven solely by greed.
No, it’s the Champions league not the fourth place league, I can remember we got knocked out a few years ago and an English team went into the group stages never having won the league infact it was their debut in European football
It’s driven by the kind of clubs the mass audience wants to see. The number of places is based on performance by country. It’s not automatic that England and Spain say, have four but the money in those leagues makes it harder for other countries to compete. Italy lost its fourth CL place. But for Juventus, their coefficient would be much lower.There is still something inherently wrong about a ‘Champions’ league where a fourth placed team gets an automated place because of the country they come from.
UEFA want the same clubs in it year on year. Driven solely by greed.
It’s wrong the way it is at the moment as it will soon be impossible for teams from outside the big 5 tv countriesI just think it’s all about money these days TT.
And their only way to get that money is to have good quality competitive matches. That will rarely involve that lot.
It’s wrong the way it is at the moment as it will soon be impossible for teams from outside the big 5 tv countries