Grigo Yossarian
Well-Known Member
That could be weeks theoretically.
My patience will be sorely tested if we say nothing for that long!
True. Mine too. Just trying to coach myself into being patient
That could be weeks theoretically.
My patience will be sorely tested if we say nothing for that long!
Surely we must be preparing something concrete through lawyers whatever this time before hitting them with all guns blazing?Maybe I'm impatient or lack strategic thinking, but does anyone else feel disappointed not to wake up to a Rangers statement this morning?
I honestly think the club need to see how Dundee vote first.Surely we must be preparing something concrete through lawyers whatever this time before hitting them with all guns blazing?
As someone said earlier if Dundee vote/voted NO the whole thing is blown out the water as that defeats their proposal that they are trying to force through thus leaving the SPFL commitee with no other decision but resigningI honestly think the club need to see how Dundee vote first.
Mafia style levels of corruption at work here , tbh I’m pretty close to being done with it all .Exactly Gazza.
Hearts was voted as an abstention because it was after 5pm, yet Dundee wasn’t ?
There’s only one reason for that. Dundee abstaining would have meant no 75% in the Championship.
A quite new depth in scottish football today.
I just had a look at a Dundee forum as that wanker Jackson has said Dundee is one of the clubs who have the required insurance someone posted if Dundee voted yes would it void that insurance policy interesting.As someone said earlier if Dundee vote/voted NO the whole thing is blown out the water as that defeats their proposal that they are trying to force through thus leaving the SPFL commitee with no other decision but resigning
Mafia style levels of corruption at work here , tbh I’m pretty close to being done with it all .
Is that a commonly held view mate , or with 42 posts is this guy seen as their equivalent of a timposter .We've a real opportunity.
Here's a post on a Hearts forum which shows the appetite (and understanding) exists on their end, too:
I’d imagine since yesterday evening board members will have been talking through what the next step is and David Graham will be working on a statement and making sure we have all our ducks in a row.their was no pint in throwing our statement after statement yesterday as it would have been lost in a sea on statements.we put out our original statement then when the spfl statement came out rangers then armed our support by supplying the time line to our support via pod casts,rangers bloggers and this site.Maybe I'm impatient or lack strategic thinking, but does anyone else feel disappointed not to wake up to a Rangers statement this morning?
Exactly Gazza.
Hearts was voted as an abstention because it was after 5pm, yet Dundee wasn’t ?
There’s only one reason for that. Dundee abstaining would have meant no 75% in the Championship.
A quite new depth in scottish football today.
Is that a commonly held view mate , or with 42 posts is this guy seen as their equivalent of a timposter .
Someone might correct me but my impression was that Hearts voted against but weren’t included in the count. The relevant figures were released by the SPFL shortly after 5.
They did vote against Deedle but the issue to the press, which a media friend sent to me, showed 10 for and 1 against for the top league. The point was made that Hearts hadn’t submitted by 5pm.
So Dundee isn’t in that category then ? ( And that’s ignoring what many of us think that Dundee submitted a NO ).
Why the inconsistency ?
We know why mate , they aren’t just bending the rules they are breaking them . How can we play in a competition next season when they have a financial , officiating , and administrational advantage like this , it no longer becomes a competition , exactly the way these low life’s want it .They did vote against Deedle but the issue to the press, which a media friend sent to me, showed 10 for and 1 against for the top league. The point was made that Hearts hadn’t submitted by 5pm.
So Dundee isn’t in that category then ? ( And that’s ignoring what many of us think that Dundee submitted a NO ).
Why the inconsistency ?
Someone might correct me but my impression was that Hearts voted against but weren’t included in the count. The relevant figures were released by the SPFL shortly after 5.
Violence.It’s an unfair league. The other members know it but they pander for sone reason to Celtic. I’ve no idea get this would be the case. We being bigger crowds and through our journey through the leagues have made many of them stronger yet for some reason they still are fearful of lawwell or mentally challenged retribution.
Tell me why.
I hope a member of the board is reading this forum
lose us the title to them in a whimper and no battle
DO NOT EXPECT US FANS TO BATTLE FOR THE CLUB IF YOU DO NOT BATTLE FOR YOUR SUPPORT , WHO HAVE FOLLOWED AND BATTLED THROUGH ENOUGH THIS DECADE TO BRING THE CLUB BACK
The club have been branded as liars, had their resolution laughed off, and have a representative on the SPFL board who is being treated like an irrelevance. And now they watch on as the governing body just keep making the rules up as they go along, publishing partial results to blatantly put pressure on a club who had abstained prior to their stated deadline.
It could be days before this charade ends with titles declared, it could be weeks. But surely Rangers have now been pushed over the edge and won't wait before hitting back.
Publish the correspondence timeline with them on our counter resolution and accuse the SPFL of lying.
Publish the evidence of the Chairman's conflict of interest due to close links with Dermot Desmond. And also his previously published hatred of Rangers and accuse him of bias.
Publish the links between the SPFL lawyer and Celtic, as well as evidence of his allegiances to them and hatred of our club.
State we are taking legal advice on making public the discussions in 2012 with the governing bodies that ended in the 5 way agreement as further evidence of bias against the club.
Call for a vote of no confidence in Doncaster after the setting of a vote deadline contrary to the rules of the organisation, causing undue haste and stress on club representatives.
State we are considering all future options in minimising any involvement in any contractual agreements of the SPFL.
State that any titles awarded without being won on the pitch will never be recognised by the club as official honours.
State that the club will oppose any league reconstruction proposals that have been artificially proposed to buy votes.
State an emergency board meeting will be held involving Club 1872 to discuss sporting and legal options open to us.
Let's Go!
Maybe I'm impatient or lack strategic thinking, but does anyone else feel disappointed not to wake up to a Rangers statement this morning?
The club have been branded as liars, had their resolution laughed off, and have a representative on the SPFL board who is being treated like an irrelevance. And now they watch on as the governing body just keep making the rules up as they go along, publishing partial results to blatantly put pressure on a club who had abstained prior to their stated deadline.
It could be days before this charade ends with titles declared, it could be weeks. But surely Rangers have now been pushed over the edge and won't wait before hitting back.
Publish the correspondence timeline with them on our counter resolution and accuse the SPFL of lying.
Publish the evidence of the Chairman's conflict of interest due to close links with Dermot Desmond. And also his previously published hatred of Rangers and accuse him of bias.
Publish the links between the SPFL lawyer and Celtic, as well as evidence of his allegiances to them and hatred of our club.
State we are taking legal advice on making public the discussions in 2012 with the governing bodies that ended in the 5 way agreement as further evidence of bias against the club.
Call for a vote of no confidence in Doncaster after the setting of a vote deadline contrary to the rules of the organisation, causing undue haste and stress on club representatives.
State we are considering all future options in minimising any involvement in any contractual agreements of the SPFL.
State that any titles awarded without being won on the pitch will never be recognised by the club as official honours.
State that the club will oppose any league reconstruction proposals that have been artificially proposed to buy votes.
State an emergency board meeting will be held involving Club 1872 to discuss sporting and legal options open to us.
Let's Go!
There you go mate - Rangers must have been listening.
Are you happy now?
Sometimes it’s all about timing.
We will not roll over on this one, we are up for a battle now I hope.