You have to be trying to wind folk up?
If this team was capable of longer winning runs, our points total would be higher. So whilst you promote the notion that winning runs means nothing, you are WRONG. This ain't Motherwell we are talking about. Sustained winning runs in a team like Rangers or Celtic means an accumulative higher points total is achieved over the season. There is no if's, buts or maybes about that.
I wasn’t talking of sustained runs.
I know the advantages of this.
My point is twofold.
Firstly, five wins in a row means precious little when you’ve won only ten out of twenty.
Put it this way, a five/six-in-a-row winning sequence or five point clear in second place.
Not for the first time, some posters cite selected facts to make their point.
For example, you’ll probably remember only two away wins since last Jelember, we had won three games in a row since the war, we had beaten a top six team this season.
This one was brought up the week Hearts dropped out of the top six.
This brings me to point two.
Why does this happen?
Does the poster want Gerrard out but doesn’t want to actually say it?
Is the poster a lurker?
This is what I ask when I read op’s like this one.
I have no problem reading that we were rubbish on Saturday.
That we’re too inconsistent.
Etc. Etc.
I agree but I’d never call our team “dug meat” as one did yesterday.
I get infuriated though by, as I’ve posted, creative statistics, especially when, in isolation, they mean zilch and there is a bigger, more important stat just as readily available.