ChildOfGoth
Well-Known Member
I feel playing that back three and sticking with it was the most costly organisational problem we had tonight as it then was compounded by losing JL in MF and a vulnerable pairing in there against a functional Union team .
I’m genuinely shocked that that setup went the distance
I thought we felt we could have head to heads through the team but clearly he felt he couldn’t risk Goldson and Sands facing up to there two forwards .
Lundstram then was reduced to a basic defensive role which was an utter waste too . Neutralised his value in many ways .
Big strategic errors tonight imo let alone the individuals making regular personal mess-ups on top .
Ryan Jack looked to me like he was well under the required game level sharpness and to then have to face an opposition who had numerical advantages and were fired up compounded his exposure to being paired with just Kamara centrally
Not good at all
I’m genuinely shocked that that setup went the distance
I thought we felt we could have head to heads through the team but clearly he felt he couldn’t risk Goldson and Sands facing up to there two forwards .
Lundstram then was reduced to a basic defensive role which was an utter waste too . Neutralised his value in many ways .
Big strategic errors tonight imo let alone the individuals making regular personal mess-ups on top .
Ryan Jack looked to me like he was well under the required game level sharpness and to then have to face an opposition who had numerical advantages and were fired up compounded his exposure to being paired with just Kamara centrally
Not good at all
Last edited: