Can you not see how stupid it is to say a big gap was overturned before so it’s likely to happen again this year.
Those swings weren’t magical, there were factors that led to them.
All factors point to Rangers improving and Celtic going backwards.
It will happen one year where the balance of power shifts. But it will not be this year.
Your argument is it has happened before so it can happen again. In the same vein I will say Rangers won the league by over 20 points last year, it happened before so it will happen again this year, ”can you not see how stupid it is to disagree”?
Bizarre that you cant see that.
Celtic have the same coaching staff that failed horrifically last year.
They have added a manager of questionable ability with no experience of European, much less Scottish football.
They have lost about 10 first team squad players.
They have lost their best defender. They have lost their best attacking/midfield player, Elynoussi, they are expected to lose their 22goal forward. They are losing about 40 goals between those 2.
They have lost their Captain, their devious, controlling CEO.
They have the same terrible goalkeeping options as last year.
They have a worse defence currently than the bombscare of last year.
Their midfield squad is overall weaker.
Their forward options are weaker.
They have no structure to help them identify and secure decent replacements.
All this goes against your argument of why they will overturn a 25 point lead. Actual tangible, objective reasons and supporting evidence versus “a gap was overturned before in completely different circumstances and I am terrified it will happen again”.
There is no good, logical reason to suggest such an enormous gap will be overturned this season.
When that has happened before it has typically been a team who has endured a period of success and is beginning its decline with aging or less motivated players. This is not the scenario you see now. It’s in comparing apples with oranges. Most things have happened before, but there needs to be actual justifying evidence of why people think such an outcome will occur now.