It's seems like we can't voice our opinions on here nowadays unless it's praising the team. Granted some posts are just f##king mental but that can encourage debate and is the whole point in fans forums. If we all sat around blindly praising the team and singing Kumbaya then the forum would be a poorer place for it. It may seem I'm contradicting myself but the negativity should be kept to the forums and not brought into the stadium.
I think if people want to voice what is sometimes quite extreme negativity and nonsense then they need to be able to take whatever comes with that.
You've got people characterising our 55th title as "only won 1 trophy out of 12".
LOL as if the same people wouldn't be on here with a whole different angle of attack had we won 8 out of 12 but not a league title.
Surely to f*ck this guy is not counting the 3 Europa League campaigns as failed attempts to get a trophy? If so then that's just mental.
Point is if Gerrard wins 55 he gets "only won 1 trophy out of 9". If Gerrard wins 3 league cups and 3 scottish cups he gets "only won the diddy cups, we wanted the big one and now the tims have 10 in a row". That's the kind of stuff you'd expect from BBC or Clyde One's resident ex-tim player trolls.
Remember when the narrative was we couldn't do it in front of fans?
That went away after we burst the Ange-ball, didn't it? Funny that.
For me, fan rage is really impotent unless it is rage designed to bring about change.
So anger at the shambles of Wharburton, Murty, Pedro, Murty is pretty damn justified.
That anger was designed to bring about change at the club. Fundamental change.
So unless people are willing to outright come and demand that Gerrard be sacked then it's just a waste of time.
Being really, really angry won't get Helander fit again and won't bring Hagi out of quarantine. Being mad won't make Gerrard change the formation or the approach to games. It won't make Lundstram play better or turn Simpson into a world-class defender (probably will actually have a negative impact).