blueballs
Well-Known Member
In these days where clubs seek all and every opportunity to better themselves - and in doing so detriment rivals - hence we now see "off the ball" coaches, analysts, nutritionists, psychologists, feckin naturists if it might work......why is it some of us still miss the bigger picture on how Septic as a club, from players to media teams, manager to boardroom totally wipe the floor with us when it comes to influencing teams, authorities and referees to suit their end. What is it that we dont get, cause the truth is they do it well.
For every "Fredo let's the team down" "shagger deserves his red" "stop being paranoid" "play well and we dont need referees" blindingly obvious comment I read, it frustrates the f*%k outof me that we miss the wood for the trees here.
None of these comments are wrong. Neither is it wrong to say Broadfoot didn't deserve red today, he did. But why is it that when we are missing our top striker for 3 matches, they're captain - guilty of challenges every bit as bad as anything Morelos has EVER done - hits last minute winners when he shouldn't be on the park? Its cause, as a tactic, they fester an atmosphere so toxic its almost impossible to conclude, with a sound mind, we are held to the same standard. Its pish easy to punish us, it's so difficult it's not worth while to do likewise to them
It's no coincidence every foul they surround a referee baying for blood. Or their manager calls for English refs cause we beat them. Or their club release statements questioning decisions and get a summit while we get 5 match bans. Or we miss players following trail by TV when.........you get the picture.
So, it's far too simplistic and naive to say he deserves this, refs not to blame for that, play well in the game and dont worry. Cause as much as each individual point may be right, and I'm no arguing that, the sum of all the parts it's that whilst we maintain the Rangers 'dignified silence' mantra and seek to explain and excuse discretions as our fault, they snarl growl and pressure referees, media, authorities and CO's as much a tactic as their match formations or lineup.......hence they have lowest bookings, suspensions, citations and hence whilst two exact same challenges in a match sees them benefit with such unexplainable different referee actions (or explainable when you see Ajer et al in Maddens face) that Brown scores the winner when he should be sitting in the stand.
Clear and simple. They reap the benefits whilst we blame our own for being petulant. It's the bigger picture we miss
For every "Fredo let's the team down" "shagger deserves his red" "stop being paranoid" "play well and we dont need referees" blindingly obvious comment I read, it frustrates the f*%k outof me that we miss the wood for the trees here.
None of these comments are wrong. Neither is it wrong to say Broadfoot didn't deserve red today, he did. But why is it that when we are missing our top striker for 3 matches, they're captain - guilty of challenges every bit as bad as anything Morelos has EVER done - hits last minute winners when he shouldn't be on the park? Its cause, as a tactic, they fester an atmosphere so toxic its almost impossible to conclude, with a sound mind, we are held to the same standard. Its pish easy to punish us, it's so difficult it's not worth while to do likewise to them
It's no coincidence every foul they surround a referee baying for blood. Or their manager calls for English refs cause we beat them. Or their club release statements questioning decisions and get a summit while we get 5 match bans. Or we miss players following trail by TV when.........you get the picture.
So, it's far too simplistic and naive to say he deserves this, refs not to blame for that, play well in the game and dont worry. Cause as much as each individual point may be right, and I'm no arguing that, the sum of all the parts it's that whilst we maintain the Rangers 'dignified silence' mantra and seek to explain and excuse discretions as our fault, they snarl growl and pressure referees, media, authorities and CO's as much a tactic as their match formations or lineup.......hence they have lowest bookings, suspensions, citations and hence whilst two exact same challenges in a match sees them benefit with such unexplainable different referee actions (or explainable when you see Ajer et al in Maddens face) that Brown scores the winner when he should be sitting in the stand.
Clear and simple. They reap the benefits whilst we blame our own for being petulant. It's the bigger picture we miss
Last edited: