james kirk can this clown be charged for slander

For almost 2 years, this mongtard has ranted on about “...Dave King is skint ...”

and now the basis of his current rant is about how the Cat Funt Ashley has forced Dave King to “....pay up in full...”

Just wishing things were so doesn’t make them real. It’s clearly wrong to mock those with serious mental health issues, but.....

Three Names claimed to have insider knowledge yet didn't know we paid Ashley to rip up the deal.

They know nothing about what is happening at the club. Starve them off the oxygen they crave and the hits their feeble blogs get and they'll disappear.
 
Why or why even give this wife beating,fantasist,mentally ill covert narcissist the time of day on here?o_O

He literally makes mad Phil look sane!
 
Honestly can't be Fxxxxx reading any of that, I've lost count of the amount of yahoo looney tunes out there who have dedicated themselves to spewing poison about us, they really are a breed apart, a pathetic diseased mob utterly obsessed beyond belief! No-one outside Scotland would seriously believe you if you tried to explain to them the behaviour and antics of these moon howling c@nts!
 
I don't have a clue about what any of that means. But he can't be charged with slander, as slander is not a thing in Scotland. Also, its not a thing in criminal law anywhere else.
 
He was having a rant at his fellow morons in arms the Scottish Football Monitor the other day because someone from that site caught him out posting comments from himself under different names on his blogs . He is mentally unstable the absolute nonsense that he claims to be in exile because of threats on his life from Loyalists in Stranraer says everything .


Have you a link?

Always suspected that half the "posters" on the comments side were him

I thought one called "the mensch "was him to but he recently accused someone on here of outing him
 
When the tims don’t want to be associated with this crackpot, it says a lot.

This loon ball took a law firms letter template off the internet, wrote a letter to himself, pretended he was being sued, and asked for donations.

He’s mentally ill
 
Why or why even give this wife beating,fantasist,mentally ill covert narcissist the time of day on here?o_O

He literally makes mad Phil look sane!

He has labelled our Chairman a "career criminal"... C*nt should be trailed over the coals for such an allegation!!
 
He craves attention ,getting mentioned on here only feeds his ego. Like mad Phil he’s desperate for Rangers to openly rebuke him. In his sick world that would be a victory. I don’t doubt they both lurk on here too. Best ignored.
 
3 names, the clumpany and john james are all the same guy. Nobody here should be reading his crap blogs. They are fantasy for Rangers haters and a plea to click on donate. Blogging is a tough business. One Rangers hating blog doesn't keep the lights on. 3 however, just about generates enough income to keep the wolf away from the door.
I wouldn't be so sure.
Phantom managed to rip them for 2 grand in just one day.
 
Have you a link?

Always suspected that half the "posters" on the comments side were him

I thought one called "the mensch "was him to but he recently accused someone on here of outing him

They are all him, with one or two roped in to pay for his'exclusives'.

It is all Rangers Porn. Give the readers something to read and keep it going, make others feel embarrassed that haven't contributed by giving bullshit numbers at the end of a transaction.

Yahoos don't fall for it, they have too many to support now giving them porn but the Sheep and Hearts fans lap it up, they fill their forums with 'the inside word'. Some are too embarrassed now to say where they heard their 'inside info' and don't mention now as they realise he'll just type what they want to hear.

Money back? Not on your Nelly.

Laughing my fucking balls off.
 
That's quite disturbing. The guy obviously has serious mental health issues that are not being addressed.

He's demented, delusional and needs help; although I think the pwick is way beyond help.
 
Christmas dinner suggestion (it's not imaginary)
That looks magic

hash1.jpg
 
I don't have a clue about what any of that means. But he can't be charged with slander, as slander is not a thing in Scotland. Also, its not a thing in criminal law anywhere else.
Defamation on the internet
It is possible for an Internet Service Provider (ISP) to be liable for the content of sites which it hosts.

This was first seen in the UK in a legal action brought by Mr Godfrey against Demon, the ISP
Common defences to libel and slander
  • That the alleged wrong-doer was not the publisher of the statement;
  • That the statement did not refer to the alleged victim;
  • That the statement's meaning was not defamatory;
  • That the statement was true;
  • That the statement was for comment on a matter of public interest;
  • In an action for slander under English law, that the statement caused no loss to the alleged victim; or
  • In a defamation action under Scots law, that the statement was made in the heat of an argument.
 
Back
Top