ChildOfGoth
Well-Known Member
No wonder , CG is -2 in goals this season in Europe someone has to cover thatHe spends more time marking our centre halfs than he does marking the opposition.
No wonder , CG is -2 in goals this season in Europe someone has to cover thatHe spends more time marking our centre halfs than he does marking the opposition.
If you don't score any goals but score one against yourself that's negative.You're right that you're struggling.
You've had to lie about me defending Lundstram.
Read your last line, that'll tell you what you need to know.
He hasn't scored a single league goal, therefore his league goal tally is ZERO.
It's not Minus One because negative goals isn't a thing.
Lundstram has given the ball away dozens of times in the last 3 years of which at least 10 have resulted in us losing goals and points.Lundstram couldn’t score in a brothel, he has 11 goals in 145 games for us, and a career 25 in 437 games.
If I am defending him, feel free to point it out. I believe my opening contribution to the thread, in a post that you've quoted is that his time is up.If you don't score any goals but score one against yourself that's negative.
It means you would lose one nil hardly fúcking positive is it.
If you're not defending Lundstram you're doing a good impression of someone that would be.
Christ. He’s scored more goals against Rangers, than for Rangers this season. That better?If I am defending him, feel free to point it out. I believe my opening contribution to the thread, in a post that you've quoted is that his time is up.
Feel free to carry on with that delusion though.
What I am doing is stating the fact that you don't get negative goals in football.
Let's take this away from Lundstram, Rangers and even the league we play in.
Please show me anywhere, anything other than this thread, where negative goals is a stat.
Anything at all that takes a players goals scored and subtracts own goals to give his total.
He's scored twice for Rangers this season.Christ. He’s scored more goals against Rangers, than for Rangers this season. That better?
Nit picking over a completely valid point for %^*& knows what reason.
Really like that wee McCowan. He was everywhere when we played them at Dens. Anyone know if he prefers us or them?Looking forward - we need more dynamic players who contribute from midfield. Remarkable that Lundstram, a decent player in my opinion, is in negative goals in the league. He’s Scored 1 OG and not scored a league goal all season. By comparison, Luke McCowan at Dundee has 9. Negative goals for a Rangers central midfielder is not going to cut it.
Those were in the Scottish cup, hence the OP’s title - “Lundstram negative league goals in the league” He said it twice for some reasonHe's scored twice for Rangers this season.
Accusing me of nit picking, on a thread that excludes Lundstams goals and invented a "stat" in order to have a dig is something else by the way.
Fair enough mate.Those were in the Scottish cup, hence the OP’s title - “Lundstram negative league goals in the league” He said it twice for some reason
Regardless I’m not going to get into a back and forth over John Lundstram with you. The guy has irritated me enough and is likely not to be a Rangers player for much longer, so not worth arguing with a fellow bear over.
Fair play. I only made the point to illustrate in our bread and butter league games he hasn’t scored 1 goal. The main jist of the post was in the first 2 words ‘Looking forward’. When we’re looking to replace our midfielders we need to sign players who are more more composed and offer more in the final third.Fair enough mate.
I don't really want to argue over him either, I just instantly question the motives of these kind of things when we set a cut off to make your point fit.
We all agree he's not good enough and needs to be gone, which he will be soon enough.
Exactly
Diomande has more since Jan including missing some games
Looking forward - we need more dynamic players who contribute from midfield. Remarkable that Lundstram, a decent player in my opinion, is in negative goals in the league. He’s Scored 1 OG and not scored a league goal all season. By comparison, Luke McCowan at Dundee has 9. Negative goals for a Rangers central midfielder is not going to cut it.
That’s true, but Celtic have struggled this year and McGregor has been criticised by their support. Completely take your point about goals around the team.Tbh mate, John Lundstram has scored 2 goals in all competitions this season for Rangers, which is exactly the same as Callum McGregor has for celtic.
Those stats are fairly average for deep central midfielders, so I do find it strange why you want to highlight this.
You use Luke McCowan as an example, but he's an attacking midfielder, more in the Matt O'Riley or Todd Cantwell mould.
The fact that O'Riley has 15 goals, McCowan 9 and Cantwell 6, is a far more concerning issue than our holding midfielder on 2 goals.
Since Sima's injury, the only 2 players who've scored goals consistently are Dessers and Tavernier.
There are plenty of attacking midfielders and wide forwards whose lack of goals and creativity should be getting questioned before John Lundstram's.
That’s true, but Celtic have struggled this year and McGregor has been criticised by their support. Completely take your point about goals around the team.
I wouldn't be throwing Diomande into the mix as a positive comparison mate.
His performances in his 2 old firm games have been woeful.
He hasn't laid a glove on their midfield and has regularly given up cheap possession, often in dangerous areas.
You're right that you're struggling.
You've had to lie about me defending Lundstram.
Read your last line, that'll tell you what you need to know.
He hasn't scored a single league goal, therefore his league goal tally is ZERO.
It's not Minus One because negative goals isn't a thing.