Deleted Account
Well-Known Member
Utter nonsense.
The memorial would have made Rangers money.
I'm assuming you're replying to the wrong post.
Utter nonsense.
The memorial would have made Rangers money.
They did, several months ago. Scott Steedman.
He also paid 30 grand to have the shite club deck staircase banners installed, when they'd already been agreed at a higher standard, similar to the commonwealth graphics, at a slightly higher cost.
The guy was an utter utter fuckwit.
A warning to everyone, the FF spelling police are always on patrol.Edited now,I didn’t have my glasses on,apologies.
A warning to everyone, the FF spelling police are always on patrol.
If I recall correctly from a previous thread, the proposed statue as part of the memorial was going to consist of JG posed in such a way that he was hi-fiving people, and that punters could have hi-fived the statue for photos and stuff. Apparently it looked rank rotten and certainly wasn't in keeping with a respectful memorial, so we pulled the plug. I'm sure others will correct me if I've got this wrong.
Rank fucking amateur
someone should be punted
And that's before we start on his use of commas.
Or starting sentences with 'and.'
Or discussing punctuation within or without single quotation marks.
Or using sentences as paragraphs.
There’s a reason we recently appointed a new head of commercial...
But who employed the fuckwit in the first place?.
And why?. Cronyism?. Jobs for the boys?.
Rangers deserves better than that!.
Is that the one who follows the bheasts on social media?.
WE NEED TO WAKE UP!.
It's beyond beliefSo we pulled out, don't get a memorial and pay for it anyway? What the hell's going on at Ibrox.
There's certainly something strange about this company.Am i reading this correct that they are only worth 200 quid and have been from the day they set up a company full of yahoo's
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/10639827/filing-history
Why sign the contract if you're not happy with the design?What's wrong with pulling the plug on a design that's absolutely shite and not fit for purpose? I don't see the problem here..
There's certainly something strange about this company.
Agreed mate.Even if it’s the case, it should have been picked up on by our board before even appointing them let alone signing off on them to do work for us
Ridiculous situation to end up in
Surely references of previous work should have been checked.Agreed mate.
just setup and no accounts and no previous work or website.My shares in Rangers are worth more that the whole company. Something fishyThere's certainly something strange about this company.
Why sign the contract if you're not happy with the design?
I wouldn't sign shit until I was happy with the design. To each his own though.Wasn't the design presented after the contract was signed? Isn't that the usual way..?
Wasn't the design presented after the contract was signed? Isn't that the usual way..?
just setup and no accounts and no previous work or website.My shares in Rangers are worth more that the whole company. Something fishy
Sign a contract for the work then come up with a series of designs for the project. Sounds quite plausible to me. Then the best one's picked for the go ahead..Seriously.
Sign the contract and we'll show you the design.
Do you really think someone would agree to that.
Precisely, we are still a shambles in some of our business.We need to stop agreeing to contracts, that bind us up in legalities in others favour
If you had cost the company you worked for £1m you wouldn't have a job.
So who lost their job ?He doesnt any more
Scott SteadmanSo who lost their job ?
No idea who he is,Is he the one who signed the contract for over a 100yrs ?Scott Steadman
So who lost their job ?